The Latest

Posted by straightlinelogic 12 years, 10 months ago to Politics
12 comments | Share | Flag

Fully comprehending the downsides of foregoing risk requires not just statistics, but imagination. How much wealth that could have funded private sector, cost effective breakthroughs in renewable energy (as opposed to government funded boondoggles), sustainable agricultural practices, cleaning up pollution, life-saving medical technologies and drugs, desalinizing ocean water, or plain old basic research, has instead gone down the big government and social safety net ratholes? How many would-be scientists, inventors, engineers, and entrepreneurs, contemplating a future of endless regulation, taxation, litigation, and competition against government succored crony capitalists, have decided the game is not worth the candle and pursued careers in the law, government, or investment banking instead? “Take care of me” has replaced “can do,” and we’ll never know what could have been done.

In Atlas Shrugged, John Galt euthanized a sclerotic world by convincing its productive giants to go on strike. Lacking such a dues ex machina to hasten its downfall; the U.S.‘s economic slide has been long and slow. Unless dramatic but unlikely remedies are administered, the prognosis is prolonged hardening of the arteries until the patient finally expires.


All Comments

  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    a re read? wow. thanks for reading it once. lol hopefully you'll enjoy our techno thriller out this fall which is a kind of fictionalized version of how this country has fallen apart.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ erudeen 12 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A lot info to take in. I am going to re-read it, to make sure I got it all. My thanks to your husband for writing it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by iroseland 12 years, 10 months ago
    every year the SOX audit becomes a bit more cumbersome to do that it was the year before. Every year the SOX auditors claim that things wont be changing after this. In the meantime useful projects are put on hold till the SOX mess is taken care of and the auditors are done having their hands held. SOX starves companies of financial capitol, and human capitol and that cuts the legs out from under the intellectual capitol.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 10 months ago
    I would take it farther, straight. Yes, increase in govt (through killing regulations and laws that affect and target entrepreneurs specifically.
    Increasing our level of technology is the only way to increase our real per capita wealth. So any policies that discourage the creation of new technologies are the ones that affect our wealth the most. Over the last decade:
    1.Sarbanes-Oxley passage
    2.Weakening of our Patent laws
    tech start-ups are built on three foundations:
    Intellectual capital, financial capital, human capital.
    SOX has starved companies of financial capital.
    Changes in patent laws have decreased intellectual capital. Changes in our accounting rules/regs such as expensing stock options, weakened attracting human capital.
    My husband's book details all of this. The point is not that americans are risk averse, they are operating where their risks will be fruitful.
    http://www.amazon.com/The-Decline-Fall-A...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo