Fabrication of data
This is an article from Tony Heller's "Real Science" blog. His historical research shows that meteorological data is being adjusted to match theory. The adjustments are not only to the current data, where readings are fabricated to create data for weather stations that are not reporting or that do not exist, but also to historical data, supposedly to correct for inaccuracies in readings of the past 130 years.
There is no scientific basis for corrections to historical data, because the work that was done in the past included discussions of methods for proper measurement and examination of the accuracy obtained.
There is no scientific basis for corrections to historical data, because the work that was done in the past included discussions of methods for proper measurement and examination of the accuracy obtained.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
There may be some win in that while part of the feds are shutdown, like be somewhat more pleasant for some - but it is usually short lived (1 week or so) and everyone just gets paid a bit later for being away from work (but "on standby").
Not what I would call a shutdown - but that is what the press proclaims it is. I would just call it extra paid vacation - and their way to a full pension after 20-years, and full healthcare.
Here is the IPCC's mandate:
"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to assess the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant for the understanding of human induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for mitigation and adaptation."
http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/
It's not about whether we cause climate change, but instead what should be done. The UN claims it's too late for thinking and nay-saying. We must act NOW! (Anyone in the way gets the "Alinsky" treatment.)