U.S. sailors humiliated because of, well, what?

Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 3 months ago to Government
84 comments | Share | Flag

our nation is behaving so stupidly with respect to Iran
that this is nearly impossible to believe. . and what
could have caused two simultaneous boat failures --
Iran's fledgling EMP program, or a staged event
to prove how the president is doing things right,
according to the Iranians, And The Congress Is All Wrong??? -- j
.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And these idiots had to have had a cell phone in their bunch, no good mellinneal ever leaves home without it...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exactly! The smelly part of the fish. If they are that incompetent, we need a new Navy. But overall, performance benchmarked against our current government, meaning it was probably ok, and they will all get Navy Achievement medals for not pissing the Iranians off.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Exactly, Michael. There is a small group of very tough military trained for those situations and the other 99.99% have no idea what to do except the rudimentary "name rank serial number". We even had 4 members of the crew on an SSBN supposedly trained to place the explosives in small tubes in the missile tubes to light off the rocket motors and make a very bright spot in the ocean if the boat was disabled and in danger of capture. Never met anyone who would confess to it though, but the little tubes were there and no one had a better explanation of what they were for.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Unfortunately, they excercise complete control over their victims, er, members. You get an incompetent idiot who will get you killed, and you have 2 choices: die, or get hung out to dry for telling them they are an idiot. Glad I retired in 1996, the stupidity factor was rising even then with officers who graduated party schools being able to tell 15 year chiefs "we are doing this my way". Several times I had to risk my career to protect my guys from stupid ideas like going topside in a submarine in heavy seas to deploy a towed array, when it was patently dangerous. You pay a price for such obstanince, but it is the right thing to do. With the sheeple we produce today, these results are not surprising. What is surprising is no one can explain with even a small shred of credibility, just how the hell they got where they were. That is the really smelly part of this mess.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed, and just like their other adventures with military, they will let them hang from the yardarm or worse, just to cover their nasty a@@es.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree completely, and apologize for the "we" nature
    of my comment;;; I am just over the mistakes and apologies
    like this which occur as a direct result of mis-managed
    military actions. . I seriously suspect that this was a ploy
    to prove that Iran is nice to us because of the diplomatic
    actions attending the "Iran Deal." . it's disgusting. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well Said, Chief! . and I fear that we will never know
    the truth about this incident. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years, 3 months ago
    Subversive politics, failed black swan events or just iran/islam showing it's slimy pagan bicameral barbarian head.
    I hate to see it expressed as "Our Nation", America or The United States. I'd rather put the blame right where it is...A corrupt, callus, ignorant government...otherwise known as a Kakistocracy...there's my favorite word again!...sorry.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Neumann, Alfred T.
    Gremlin, Frederick T III
    Snoman, Frazier, T.
    Louis, Louie, NMI
    Thang, Wilder T.

    and we had the dog tags to prove it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The military is the biggest collective in existence. If it was any other way it wouldn't be the military. There are certain things that are allowed and encouraged if captured The rule is hold out for 24 hours or longer. Gives the home team time to change comunications codes and operating instrutions and battle plans to be changed depending on how much you know. It's a given everyone with zero exceptions can be broken. That's why some of our units go through training inludiing SERE Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape. One technique which was a killer in efficiency could be stopped by slapping your hand either one on the table. The weak sisters now are up in arms meaning the ones attached they are too weak for real weapons called these days water boarding. In POW camps we went through a modified regime of sleep deprivation and other fun stuff liked being chained to tree growing in the middle of the Peoples Pool. May have been Florida but it was also winter. Our leadership in camp got people out by digging a tunnel from the two holder pit another was a diversion where some went over the wire and made the tree line. My job was to feign stealing a vehicle and busting out through the outer perimeter gates. How realistic? By the time we got to those activities I was in for a mandatory shrink visit. He ended up tied up and gagged for real..I had his car keys - a pickup - and when the main effort occured I drove out the gate to a rally point. the reward was 24 hours of sleep with showers etc. and then back inside. The shrink that I had gone round the bend. That was one of the first SERE exercises put to gether by real live POWs. Thing is even or more especially nside we became a whole. Last night about 4AM was a formation for hea count. Instead we were lined behind bags of our real clothes the lights went on tables of food and then the flag went up. No one moves but one guy muttereed. Another fucking commie trick. No one moved a muscle. They had to convince us the training was over. The big diversion was capturing some inside the fence guards and that was answered by mock machine gunning everyone. including the guards. Good soldiers are never wasted on POW camps they are expendable. Trouble was I forgot where I parked the pick up.

    Anyone could quit at any time. No problem. Next stop back to Bragg and reassignment to the 82nd . A fate worse than hillary getting elected.

    We lost five percent or a bit more of our unit. They were never allowed back.

    All to buy 24 hours. But you did it for your fellow soldiers not for God, Country, Americans, or the flag. We did for our equals.

    Only comment at the end. Why didyou wait until after Vienam to give the training?

    Answer. Didn't know what to train. But the planning started in the middle of that conflict.

    We built a better unit. and made ourselves into better soldiers and human beings. Our unit was different in that respect. Much different.

    i would rather doubt those sailors had any idea what they had gotten into. No one tells a snipe or deck hand nuttin from nuttin' They are in a word...expendable.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by scojohnson 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's because it happened to me... there were about 10 of us, just back from Rwanda and we had a night to kill in Frankfurt, Germany while the C-5 was getting a landing gear strut changed.

    Nothing serious happened... but after a few hours of German beer in the red light district, probably being a little louder than we should have been walking by the downtown train station.. and you should have seen the look on the unarmed German police officers faces that stopped to question us at 2 am in the morning with their little billy club things when 3 of the guys were OSI agents and had concealed firearms in shoulder holsters on them. It was classic.

    Then we loaded up a HumVee with a bunch of cases of German beer to smuggle into the C-5 cargo bay the next morning.

    That was back in the early 90s... the Germans were still pretty much our little lapdog.

    Rwanda was horrible... 90% AIDS infection rate, so you didn't want a local to even touch you, so for fun we mounted-up and went safari hunting. Peacekeeping can be incredibly boring.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Esceptico 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I did not know about the cultural aspect. My experience with the French for 40 years, though, is they are very polite --- even in Paris.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    More than opinion as long as it's withing the ROE etc. that's exactly how you put people if not face down but on the knees after a while makes it hard to move or move fast....easier to handcuff and control. the whole idea is control the situation using if you are police LEAST amount of force necessary. that includes whatever until the cuffs and zipties go on. then the least needed lowers. The most ridiculous statement you hear from someone is "don't touch me take your hands off me." Sure sign the doer is two slices short of a loaf. The neat thing is if they keep yammering on theyare digging their own grave. Invariably even with warnings given they will let something slip out of bravado. Recorders are a wonderful thing. Most good arrests involve a fair amount of stupidity. What I don't know about is facing a full size mob without a pepper fogger or triple chasers or inciters trained for it but the biggest mob I stopped was one infantry battalion but that's another story.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He can't pardon where there is no conviction. I wouldn't put the cart before the horse and unless she cops a plea deal, that trial isn't going to be over by the time the elections come around.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There's a bit of a cultural disconnect here. If we were on the outs with the Brits or Canadians, a "Sorry 'bout that, old bean," would be appropriate, as we share a common vision of courtesy. The French would demand an abject apology, which of course, we would refuse, respecting each others' rudeness. The Middle Eastern view is that to offer a gratuitous apology is either a) an insult, since it's meaningless, or b) a sign of obsequious weakness. I suspect the Iranians will view it as the latter. A statement of the intrusion being an act of incompetence, and offering respect for the professionalism of their military strikes the proper balance to promote a better relationship.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Esceptico 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Another possibility is they did not drift into Iranian waters by accident and this was some sort of intended intrusion for reasons we do not know. In any event, we did violate their national waters with an armed vessel — not a sport fisher — and for that I do think we owe them a “Gee, I’m sorry we did that.” This nothing more than basic civility one would extend to your next door neighbor if you went into their back yard.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If I was in command of a military area, and a non-ally showed up unannounced in an armed vessel, I would definitely detain the vessel and crew. I might not put them on their knees "perp style," like the Iranians did, but I would definitely keep them under armed guard until we got a good explanation, and direction as to whether or not we should detain or release them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    50 50 the military will look for a scapegoat who is a. not from a trade school and b. who has no rabbi. and c. what level they are trying to protect. A good chunk of the military is in 100% CYA mode to keep some upper levels from destroying their careers while expecting the lower ranks to lie, cheat, steal, and take the blame. Did all of the crew have a complete SOFA/ROE briefing? Really? Witnesses or just some piece of paper with a coerced signature? This same group of careerists will NOT uphold their oath of office. There is a reason we combat soldiers called them REMFs.

    Rear Echelon Mother Feathers.

    Which doesn't mean all are bad. But the public trusts the politicians who trust the REMFs in one big ass kissing CYA framework and that is one reason public has lost it's country and why combat soldiers wonder why? And wonder if they are worth the effort. The reminder is we never swore allegiance to citizens or country or Presidents. Only to the Constitution.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was wondering the same and had 1 more question that maybe you can answer.

    If the tables were turned and an Iranian boat drifted into US water, would the US military have responded similarly? Any idea?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    As a retired officer, the answer is simple. There are no hostilities ongoing, declared or otherwise, between the U.S. and Iran, so starting combat in this situation is a court martial offense. The Gulf is particularly contentious with the Iranians and Saudis at loggerheads, and the Iranians know we're a Saudi ally, so the least they might suspect an armed U.S. warship would be doing in their territorial waters is spying. Iran is nervous about the potential for war, so I would say their troops handled the situation well, as did ours. I would say the petty officer who issued a spontaneous apology should at least be given a verbal reprimand.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't think an apology is in order, but a statement of fact: we navigated poorly, and wound up in the wrong location; we understand the natural concern of Iranian military, seeing military craft crossing into their waters unannounced, and would have taken similar action, detaining the ships and crew until the situation was clarified to everyone's satisfaction. The Iranian military acted professionally, and we appreciate their prompt return of our crew. No apology needed, since no hostile intent caused the event.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 3 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rules of engagement. Status of Forces agreement. and law of mass. Frigates out vote small boats. AKA Law of relative proportions. All sail boat sailors know it as why sail does NOT have right of way. The educated sail boat sailors know they are 8th sometimes ninth ont he list for priorities of right of way. These guys were out tonnaged and out gunned and hampered by whatever rules were in force. Then there is the question of the mission statement. Another bag of worms and snakes at times.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo