Millennials and their work demands

Posted by $ blarman 8 years, 3 months ago to Business
78 comments | Share | Flag

I just want to shake these idiots (millennials). Do they understand that the typical cost of a new hire (including productivity costs, training costs, HR costs, etc.) is $10K even for a low-level position?

Further, I am not interested in someone working for me who tells me in the interview they are probably going to be gone in 1-2 years. They obviously do not understand that the very leadership roles they seek require insights into the company, its people, its competitors, its systems, and its customers - and those take years to acquire - not days.

I don't care how much you know about technology. I don't care how connected you are with your peers. I want to know what you are going to bring in the long term to my business that is going to justify me hiring you.
SOURCE URL: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-12/when-the-10-year-work-anniversary-is-a-personal-failure?cmpid=BBD011216_BIZ


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 3 months ago
    I am a Gen-Xer who appreciates the Millennial view. They want to move fast and break things. In 10 years they want to have 10 ten years of experience, not 2 years of experience repeated five time. That works for me b/c anything that can be systematized will be. Move fast and break things, Millennials! If they're not excited to stay here in a year, they should leave. If I'm not excited to have them, I should ask them to leave. Anything else isn't being fair.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 8 years, 3 months ago
      Doesn't that generate shallow knowledge? If you are moving fast and breaking things, do you have the time to know what you are breaking?

      Do you want to see a cardiologist who was a urologist last year because he wanted to have 10 different years of experience?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 8 years, 3 months ago
        Well said. And being in IT myself, the notion of breaking things to break things is absolutely stupid. It's what put Kmart out of business. But you don't break things in production just to see what happens.

        If the goal is knowledge, you can learn a lot about a process by doing two things: learning it, and asking questions about why it gets done that way. Now there are going to be times when the answer is "because we've always done it this way". That is a flag to warrant further investigation - but not an automatic sign of something in need of an "upgrade". You can get to the point (modern operating systems are the classic example) where you spend so much time in "upgrade" mode that you don't spend any time in "get things done" mode. There may be a better way of doing things, but that must be balanced against the cost of the change - and that cost includes not only hardware and software but re-training on new process: frequently the least quantifiable and most expensive part of the process.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 3 months ago
        "If you are moving fast and breaking things, do you have the time to know what you are breaking?"
        If your goal is consistency, you want structures and people that discourage change and breaking things. If your goal is innovation, you want lots of trial and error. In the modern economy, robots are doing tasks that require consistency and the value is generated by innovation, so much so that the word "innovation" is almost becoming a cliche.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 8 years, 3 months ago
          I'm not talking about consistency, I'm talking about tasks that involve more than shallow understanding. Many fields take more than a few months to understand the depths. Coming in and using trial and error to try the same thing someone tried a couple of years ago because you don't know the history is not innovation, it's ignorance.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 3 months ago
            Yes. The hardest part is coming up with new hypotheses to test. Even when it feels like "shotgunning", just going through every possible thing we can think of, we're actually using knowledge--- not just blind trial and error.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by edweaver 8 years, 3 months ago
        I haven't seen many of them moving that fast with the exception of the keys on their phone. :) I'm sure there are exceptions but have you ever been in a hurry to get somewhere and have to stop at a store to get a few things on the way. Checking out is painstakingly slow in most cases, even if you say that you are running late and in a hurry.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo