Just when you think it can't get more stupid: “Hillary wonders: Why is a State Department employee using personal e-mail?”
An email using hillary's private non secured email server has this gem ....
Why is a State Department Employee using private email for official business.
THIS is NOT evidence of presidential material.
Why is a State Department Employee using private email for official business.
THIS is NOT evidence of presidential material.
Even if the FBI is successful at building a solid case for criminal disregard for protection of national secrets, it's doubtful the AG, Loretta Lynch, will issue an indictment against Hillary. The backstory will undoubtedly leak, but it will be easily played as just another "right wing conspiracy."
The real backfire on the Clintons is building, and it revolves around Bill's "bimbo eruptions," and Hillary's role in the brutal suppression of those women's testimony. What some of the media pundits don't yet get is that the younger voters didn't live through the sex scandals of Bill Clinton that happened over 20 years ago, and they've been much more sensitized to women's rights and sexual abuse. As the old information is rehashed and disclosed, that will have a bigger impact with younger voters than the confusing email fiasco.
did not have such a high standard. -- j
.
.
She, just like state dept. are nothing but perverted criminals.
The fact it's actually true just reinforces your point; definitely not evidence of presidential material.
Woman's got fashion sense. Should work out fine.
How many have the balls to say I cannot do that Madam Secretary it violated my oath of office and leave me knowingly committing a crime. If you do it it leaves me in the same hard spot. If you handed me a piece of paper I had never seen before I could honestly state to it's condition at the time.
Most would rather break the law than uphold if there jobs are threatened not to mention future promotions. So let's put young office wonk in front of a Judge and Jury.
"Did there ever come a time when you were asked to alter a classified document?"
"Yes."
"And did you?"
"Yes but I was following orders."
That's called a Nuremberg Defense and it is not a defense but an open admission of guilt and acknowledgement of having committed a criminal act - with a plea for clemency usually attached.
Hillary has no such defense not even the Nuremberg version. UNLESS she was given a a similar order and that would mean Obama. As the Senior Officer in the State Department She answered only to the President.
But no Judge has asked the aide or Hillary that question. The FBI may have asked and asked others.
The original Nuremberg Defense went something like this. ' I vast chust following orders Mein Herr. I had no choice.' People who tried that defense ended up on a gallows for war crimes.the were called National Socialists.
A fair connection.
Some how the excuse of following policy and regulations is so fricking bogus from the individual who sets policy and regulations.
What does she say to that employee. Upside is YOU may get away with it. Downside is YOU get caught.
...all that stuff.