All Comments

  • Posted by j_IR1776wg 12 years, 2 months ago
    If you take a heart attack and die in the park, do your survivors get a summons for prolonged horizontalism? And do they have to to produce the corpse in court as evidence? :-)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Abaco 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What? You're more docile than I am. I probably would have been arrested for laughing really loud... I even read this story with a huge grin on my face. "Sorry sir. Not allowed to law down in the park." Probably didn't help that the perp was a family man who was actually spending time with his children. Lucky he wasn't tazed for that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 12 years, 2 months ago
    That's what you get when you try to write a law for everything. Commonsense goes out the window.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would assume they have vagrancy laws. Just encourage the homeless to move on when it becomes problematic. This is a dumb ordinance.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would complain too-however, I would not whine. I would publicize that to the hilt. there's lots of bad ordinances that are passed in order to deal with the homeless population. I guess if you never want to have to see a homeless person in that town, you also can't have picnics in public parks
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 2 months ago
    passing more ordinances and more rules means that decent, law abiding people are doing things illegal. I am not saying the homeless person who called is outside this category. Maybe it should be a no-camping kind of rule. This is probably a symptom of the broader economic conditions problem
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    If these folks disagree with the law then they should have stated what options there are. Why was this ordinance passed in the first place? How do we change it to avoid unintended consequences? They were just whining.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 12 years, 2 months ago in reply to this comment.
    who can't put out a picnic blanket in the park??? you have been urban indoctrinated I think. In flyover, parks are supposed to utilized. That's why they have benches and lawns. and it used to be-a park officer was nowhere to be seen unless it was garbage pick up day. by the time I have grandkids, maybe they won't know what a "picnic" is?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by richrobinson 12 years, 2 months ago
    I think these folks over reacted. If an officer told me that I would say okay and move on. She said it ruined their day. I think worse things happened to people that day. Get over it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LionelHutz 12 years, 2 months ago
    Clearly the homeless guy has gotten busted over this in the past and is set on ruining everyone else's day over this issue in an effort to get the law changed.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo