Votes for sale! Free Speech for sale!
Free Speech IS for sale and the final auction is currently in progress. Cui Bono or follow the money started in 1819.
First Step - Corporations Are People
The 1819 Supreme Court Decision in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. Dartmouth College had been granted a corporate charter by King George III awarding land and the right toadminister the college. In 1819 the trustees deposed the college president.
The New Hampshire legislature passed legislation taking away the college's King George charter, putting the State of New Hampshire in charge making it a State college.
The Supreme Court ruled while all political ties had been severed with King George III as a goverenment, the charter still constituted a contract with King George, the person.
The Supreme Court held this contract fell under the Contracts Clause of the US Constitution which forbids laws overturning contracts among persons, and held it applied to corporations as well. Dartmouth College remained private and under control of trustees.
Rights of contract and property now applied to corporations." (and did not limit the type nor the purpose.)
Second Step - Corporations as Citizens
The First Clause of the 14th Amendments you will recall set forth the privileges, immunities of citizens, banned depriving life, liberty, or property without due process and banned denying any person equal protection of the laws.
Corporations then challenge the powers of the State Governments under 14th Amendment.
The corporations held the 14th separated the properties of group entities from individual properties of their members for purposes of protecting investors from claim s against the corporation and also held the properties of the group with the properties of the members. Since corporations were persons they had the same constitutional protections as persons had"...(in effect wanting to have it both ways.)
"...in 1886 the railroads brought" suit to the Supreme Court in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. In Santa Clara County. Using a tax exemptio that allowed people paying mortgages on their property to deduct the amount of their mortgages from their taxes.
The precedent of corporate as a citizen with full rights of Citizenship came out of this case. Not from any anything written in favor or against by any of the justices. The precedent came from an remark made by Chief Justice Waite that was taken down by a clerk and appeared in the head notes for the case.
'The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids any state to deny any person with in it's jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations. We are of the opinion it does not.' The Chief Justice at that time was former Railroad attorney.
Third Step.."Corporations as Persons and as Citizens gain wider advantages.
3A 1889 the court overtly granted due process Amendment to corporations;
3B 1893 it was Fifth amendment protections of double jeopardy;
3C 1906 Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable search and seizure.
Fourth Step - Corporations Gain the Right to interfere in balloting.
3D 1978 the right to make contributions to ballot initiative campaigns."
Fifth Step - Money As Free Speech
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice
Though a corporation could not go to the polls and vote, as a 'person' it has the right of free speech since it's shareholders have the right of free speech.
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm
Sixth Step "Money Is Free Speech applies to Corporations."
Since eople have a right to as much speech as they want and since money is speech, corporations including LLC's and non profits have the right to spend as much money as they want on elections with only one limit. The 5 to 4 vote by a conservative court."
Seventh Step - The left came out against that decision as it supported corporate support to anyone from anyone. is corporate power of purchasing votes. Since the left enjoys a large group of support from billionaires an millionaires one has to wonder why. The answer is they are using the anti-corporate method to gain the direct method currently denied by the court.
"Any individual should be able, under free speech, to contribute to any campaign in any part of the nation." Or as I put it some months ago. "I have the right without explanation to take away your rights without exception."
http://endcitizensunited.org/about-us/ as an organization is now reversing the steps again to get rid of the need for 'bagmen" and allow direct access to candiates and issues in any part of the nation.
That is the current goal and last step.
Which means anyone especially the big money billionaire can interfere in your local precinct, district, town, county or State and buy all the candidates, officials, and heavily influence balloting anywhere they want they need no geo-political ties to interfere in your elections.
How much can you afford to contribute in the purchase of free speech if George Soros decides to target your local election?
Which should give you a clue as to who is behind all this. Like Same Sex it's George, http://moveon.org, ACLU and the secular progressives who saw a good deal and acted on it. But not to your benefit.
I got all of the above direct from Yoda's writings....George Lakoff. They are very open about it and believe you and I can do nothing to stop them.
Votes For Sale will be followed by Government for Sale - A Progressive Production coming soon to a precinct near your doorstep.
PS there is something that can be done ....Couch Potatoes need not apply.
The same method used to get Same Sex passed. Get it into the courts,Use a friendly bought and paid for judge. Bingo!
The antidote is any number of citizens rights violated especially due process based on no valid geo-political connection. Those who MAY not vote MAY not contribute which if applied does not violate any free speech as all ballots are level by level inclusive of every registered voters interests. All the way from top to bottom
It also addresses the issue of buying politicians
First Step - Corporations Are People
The 1819 Supreme Court Decision in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward. Dartmouth College had been granted a corporate charter by King George III awarding land and the right toadminister the college. In 1819 the trustees deposed the college president.
The New Hampshire legislature passed legislation taking away the college's King George charter, putting the State of New Hampshire in charge making it a State college.
The Supreme Court ruled while all political ties had been severed with King George III as a goverenment, the charter still constituted a contract with King George, the person.
The Supreme Court held this contract fell under the Contracts Clause of the US Constitution which forbids laws overturning contracts among persons, and held it applied to corporations as well. Dartmouth College remained private and under control of trustees.
Rights of contract and property now applied to corporations." (and did not limit the type nor the purpose.)
Second Step - Corporations as Citizens
The First Clause of the 14th Amendments you will recall set forth the privileges, immunities of citizens, banned depriving life, liberty, or property without due process and banned denying any person equal protection of the laws.
Corporations then challenge the powers of the State Governments under 14th Amendment.
The corporations held the 14th separated the properties of group entities from individual properties of their members for purposes of protecting investors from claim s against the corporation and also held the properties of the group with the properties of the members. Since corporations were persons they had the same constitutional protections as persons had"...(in effect wanting to have it both ways.)
"...in 1886 the railroads brought" suit to the Supreme Court in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. In Santa Clara County. Using a tax exemptio that allowed people paying mortgages on their property to deduct the amount of their mortgages from their taxes.
The precedent of corporate as a citizen with full rights of Citizenship came out of this case. Not from any anything written in favor or against by any of the justices. The precedent came from an remark made by Chief Justice Waite that was taken down by a clerk and appeared in the head notes for the case.
'The court does not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids any state to deny any person with in it's jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws, applies to these corporations. We are of the opinion it does not.' The Chief Justice at that time was former Railroad attorney.
Third Step.."Corporations as Persons and as Citizens gain wider advantages.
3A 1889 the court overtly granted due process Amendment to corporations;
3B 1893 it was Fifth amendment protections of double jeopardy;
3C 1906 Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable search and seizure.
Fourth Step - Corporations Gain the Right to interfere in balloting.
3D 1978 the right to make contributions to ballot initiative campaigns."
Fifth Step - Money As Free Speech
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice
Though a corporation could not go to the polls and vote, as a 'person' it has the right of free speech since it's shareholders have the right of free speech.
(https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm
Sixth Step "Money Is Free Speech applies to Corporations."
Since eople have a right to as much speech as they want and since money is speech, corporations including LLC's and non profits have the right to spend as much money as they want on elections with only one limit. The 5 to 4 vote by a conservative court."
Seventh Step - The left came out against that decision as it supported corporate support to anyone from anyone. is corporate power of purchasing votes. Since the left enjoys a large group of support from billionaires an millionaires one has to wonder why. The answer is they are using the anti-corporate method to gain the direct method currently denied by the court.
"Any individual should be able, under free speech, to contribute to any campaign in any part of the nation." Or as I put it some months ago. "I have the right without explanation to take away your rights without exception."
http://endcitizensunited.org/about-us/ as an organization is now reversing the steps again to get rid of the need for 'bagmen" and allow direct access to candiates and issues in any part of the nation.
That is the current goal and last step.
Which means anyone especially the big money billionaire can interfere in your local precinct, district, town, county or State and buy all the candidates, officials, and heavily influence balloting anywhere they want they need no geo-political ties to interfere in your elections.
How much can you afford to contribute in the purchase of free speech if George Soros decides to target your local election?
Which should give you a clue as to who is behind all this. Like Same Sex it's George, http://moveon.org, ACLU and the secular progressives who saw a good deal and acted on it. But not to your benefit.
I got all of the above direct from Yoda's writings....George Lakoff. They are very open about it and believe you and I can do nothing to stop them.
Votes For Sale will be followed by Government for Sale - A Progressive Production coming soon to a precinct near your doorstep.
PS there is something that can be done ....Couch Potatoes need not apply.
The same method used to get Same Sex passed. Get it into the courts,Use a friendly bought and paid for judge. Bingo!
The antidote is any number of citizens rights violated especially due process based on no valid geo-political connection. Those who MAY not vote MAY not contribute which if applied does not violate any free speech as all ballots are level by level inclusive of every registered voters interests. All the way from top to bottom
It also addresses the issue of buying politicians
