Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 2 months ago
    Of course it passed.
    As I have been warning for 3 years here, the GOP are no better than the Dems. They follow the path they have followed for generations: increasing power to themselves in government and stealing it from the people.
    Lucky people! We get all the immigrants that the muslim in chief wants us to have.
    Welcome! Bomb strapped to your chest? No problem!

    This is what you should expect from anyone in the statist party, even when they claim to have been "influenced" by Ayn Rand's work.
    GOP. Nothing but lying looters.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 2 months ago
      I think that the Republican party is worse than the D's because they continuously fool us with the rhetoric and then just pull the rug from underneath us come time for the "vote". Bait and switch (at least the dippy D's stick to their rhetoric)!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
      Absolutely !! The two parties are the same. This is why even the GOP is against Trump. At least he tells us when the emperor has no clothes, and he has my vote.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 2 months ago
        Supporting Trump is still agreeing to be enslaved and manipulated. Trump is Donald Sidious.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
          its either him or Hillary. no one else can beat her with her immense liberal support
          At this point I would rather have Sanders Hillary. At least the whole thing will be over faster. I will give up on the United States until it crashes. I plan on shrugging in practice and will live out my life without getting engaged.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 2 months ago
    One can hope, but don't hold your breath.

    I heard Paul Ryan say that he is off to a good start as Speaker. I hope no one saw me laughing out loud while driving down the road. Ryan, as well as most elected officials are so out of touch with reality, I don't know if I should laugh or cry.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 2 months ago
      If I were an Olympian God, I would laugh ("What fools these mortals be"). But as a resident of the planet, I can only angrily cry.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 2 months ago
        "If I were an Olympian God,"
        the RNC and DNC would be toast, and the lawn of the White House would have a warning for all future party leaders burned into it that could not be obliterated or covered up.
        Not that those fool mortals would heed it.
        I still want one of those cool saucers from Independence Day.
        Power corrupts.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 2 months ago
          Back in the 70s we visited D,C. and toured the White House among other sights. A docent took a shine to my wife and gave her a White House ash tray. Pity I don't smoke or I'd be viciously grinding cigars into it several times a day. Symbolism is not reality, though, unless you're a liberal.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
      Cry. He sold us all out by increasing the deficit. The so called tax loopholes have been in the system for years now- extending them didnt increase the deficit. It was the OTHER increases in actual spending that did it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 2 months ago
      I would vote for crying. I had high hopes for Ryan when he put together his plans to whittle away the budget. Those hopes dwindled and died when he became Speaker over several better choices. Now it seems that he, too, has conscripted Boehner's lack of spine.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by fosterj717 10 years, 2 months ago
      Define "Good Start"! Does that mean continuing Boehner's giving Obama and D's everything they ask for hoping that people will like the R's more? This guy is as bad as Boehner, perhaps even worse!

      When will we get someone with intelligence and guts that will go to the mat to save this country?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 2 months ago
        Good start was not my words, it was Paul Ryan's. My definition of a good start is quit different from his. IMHO, you just summed up Ryan's definition very well.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ewv 10 years, 2 months ago
    The video of Sen. Sessions objecting is almost all on immigration, including a big emphasis on his protectionist opposition to legal foreign workers.

    Where is his concern for the rest? There is a lot in the omnibus bill that is objectionable besides funding Obama's illegal immigration policies and subsidizing illegal immigrants with "tax credits".

    One big item almost no one is mentioning is extending the controversial anti-private property rights Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) first authorized in 1965 in Lyndon's Johnson "Great Society" and which expired a few months ago. It was last re-authorized in 1990 and the latest re-authorization had been held up.

    Federal and state land is now about 40% of the land in the country and LWCF is used to fund eminent domain for expansion of the National Park Service and other Federal and state land agencies. The viro lobby has been pushing to make LWCF permanent, with no future authorizations required, as a step towards its agenda to turn it into an entitlement for government land acquisition of at least $1 billion per year. The viros want to bypass the annual Congressional appropriations process with a permanent entitlement in perpetuity, with no protection against eminent domain. Republicans in the House have been attempting to turn it into a primarily state subsidy and funding for maintenance while continuing annual appropriations, which would at least weaken it, even though the states have used it to fund eminent domain, too.

    As usual, "deals were made" and LWCF was extended in another "compromise" for four years with funding appropriated for the next year, including Federal acquisition by the National Park Service. The seizing of private property trapped in Federal areas was cynically described in hearings last summer as "in fill" to remove inholders and "edge fill' for expansions.

    These omnibus bills, usually lame duck at the end of the session, are always dangerous and are not restricted to funding. There are often attempts to slip through controversial new land acquisition programs that could not be passed in the regular session. A huge omnibus bill containing all kinds of controversial pressure group bills that could not previously pass on their own are lumped together so that each Congressman has an incentive to vote for it for his own political purposes without regard to the rest. Some are not coming back and have no accountability to voters at all. A lot of innocent Americans have been shafted by this process.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 2 months ago
      He's only got a certain amount of time and this is an issue which is resonating with voters right now - and probably with those in his home state. If he goes off on a bunch of tangents instead of sticking to one point, he loses people.

      I don't disagree with you: there are a lot of things in the bill to be concerned about. Unfortunately, death by a thousand cuts doesn't apply to politicians trying to get a bill killed. :(
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 2 months ago
    Yesterday on the radio Rush said Obama called Paul Ryan to state: "Thanks for making government work."
    I keep wondering what RINO Ryan said when he puckered up to respond.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 2 months ago
      How about "happy to do it" I needed that fence around my house; masser.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ allosaur 10 years, 2 months ago
        I'm sure RINO Ryan was pleased as punch.
        (A punch called Kool-Aid).
        I'm also sure RINO Ryan was high-fiving other RINOs and even some Dems over his wonderful subservient leadership achievement.
        Now what was it GOP candidates were promising the voters?
        Aw, what the heck! That hurdle lies behind them now.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 2 months ago
          allosaur,
          I don't understand why people are so concerned about the election cycle since there is quite obviously absolutely zero difference between any of the parties. They all know one direction and that is down hill and they are accelerating the farther down they get so when they hit bottom the entire country simply crashes and explodes. it will be one of the best light shows you can imagine and should happen on the 4th of July.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 2 months ago
    In my present state of disability, the worse I could do is beat the crap out of a pillow. As Sessions spoke, I found it difficult to control my anger. I thought that I couldn't possibly get more upset than with the Yale students petitioning against the 1st Amendment. To my surprise, I found that I could.I knew in the back of my mind that we had a one party system, but up until now, I refused to admit it to myself. Well, I cannot deny it any longer. It is even worse than the shameless one party systems found under totalitarian regimes in that it pretends to give you a choice. I guess I'm moving to the "dark side" because that's the only side left. It's hell to get old, because I can remember when this country hadn't fallen over the cliff into the abyss of totalitarianism.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by bsmith51 10 years, 2 months ago
    Following the Goldwater loss in 1964 and the takeover of the Dems in 1968 by the Alinsky radicals, government looting became a full time profession. The Republicans had no answer to the Dems promise of free stuff for votes before a population not interested in ethics, history or morality, so they compromised. The cancer will only be cured when the patient is dead.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by term2 10 years, 2 months ago
      I think the government has decided the national debt will never be repaid, so its best just to spend the wealth contained in the US dollar and let it crash.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 2 months ago
    I watched the entire 9.12 minutes of the talk and was waiting to see if the camera would pan the chamber so we could see the number of other representative (?) sitting and listening. What I suspect is that there might have been 10 if that many. The only thing he accomplished was to get his say. And as we have seen it was passed so all could go home for the holidays. If we were to be lucky maybe they will not return.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 10 years, 2 months ago
    It will not fail.

    Republicans will not regain their party until enough of them stop looking for handouts, man-up and just support the success of a free market.

    I don't get the tax breaks for states without local sales tax. So what? Seems to me all the states without sales tax are the least socialist. Is the implication that these states unfairly benefit from putting their tax burden on property tax receiving a break in federal taxes?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 2 months ago
      The premise is incorrect. The states with out income tax are the least socialist as income tax is primarily a control measure of the government over citizens philosophy. The states with property tax likewise as it turns property ownership into rental property.

      Sales Tax on the other hand is the least socialist as the buying decision, thus the tax contributed to the government is a citizen decision to the extent they can afford to buy anything.

      I would translate the wording this way.

      A reward of a tax break is given to states who have chosen a fascist income tax over an independent choice consumption tax UNLESS the state has all of those taxes in which case they do not need a reward.

      As for the Republicans they have earned a higher standard of regaining credibility. We know the left is dirty and there is no hope there. We know some Republicans, about fourty is it have shown signs of being unhappy with the RINO majority.

      The answer is for the Republicans in office to re-register under a different name. which would attract citizens who are likewise unhappy. 40 is not a bad start. It would show some integrity and a lack of fear a presentlly hanging over the GOP as if it were a city dump burn. My personal preference would be Constitutional Republicans and then pushing for some changes in exchange for their votes. Blocking unlimited direct contributions to candidates. Limiting the currently allowed contributtions to PACS to be spent in the donor own geo-political area per his/her voters ballot and pamphlet.. Changing the format of bills submitted with a cover page that cites the names gives a intent statement that matches the name, cites a constitutional authority, and a cost and source of funding. My top three.

      However if they continue same old same old same old I have no interest in left wing sell outs.

      But as for that tax break as stated I would not trust it too far. Anything worth doing is worth at least a literate heading. my take is 'suspicious.'
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo