I gave you five points instead Merry Christmas!

Agreed BUT the sequence is...

Cease Enabling
Take Control
Make Changes

The point behind the under vote be it No Confidence or None of the Above is to force a change and the only way to do that is a real two party system and honest elections.

That's not going to come from the extreme left democrats and such but might come from the right wing of the left IF some current Republicans form their own separate party affiliation and make a firm stand of being Constitutionalist not just in word but in deed.

Which brings us back to destroying their credibility with the under vote... For the top two spots that's left. Coupled with never voting for one of those two leftist parties at any level in any election.etc etc. A lot more can be done within the local district and oh yes IF the legal vote buying scheme is stopped.

Lots of if's but the rest of the methods get an F for failure. Failing yourself primarily

True it's more like taking

How awful are these angels you are imagining?

My how time flys and how little people are willing to spend 125 years counting TR to today and no demonstrated willingness other than talk from anyone in government and damn little outside of government to spend eight much less 16 reversing....Sad. Soon we'll be the ITYSSSS Ityssssies means I told you so secular socialism sucks- assuming we are allowed to say such things.

As many as you care to imagine.

It was not complimentary nor were my comments on his opponent. Neither were acceptable. What we did was vote for none of the above and then spread the idea that a no confidence vote by not voting destroys credibility. That is slowly working. The goal is raise the 30-35 percent non participation in presidential elections to 50% plus and the off year from 50% to 70%. Which; means the winner has to be a plurality and not a majority even with winner take all. So assume best conditions for a candidate is less than 50% minus the independent voters assume at best a 40 percent turnout of the party faithful Rino and Dino or a 21 percent needed to win.

After that it's self explanatory. No landslides, no mandates. The goal is to destroy the present system and return to open elections with real choice. If it destroys the nation? That's happening anyway. Best part is our little group has no contact with each other once the guidelines were agreed to but judging from the articles, comments, and headlines and the percentage movements it's working.

One prime area is military people. One question then open discussion. "What would it take for you to uphold your oath of office?"

A second target area is called - enablers or toilet flushers.

Exactly. One of his trump cards is the ability to jump in either direction and thus leave the impression that he supports those directions. He's astute and is making sure he doesn't repeat the mistakes of others. Doesn't mean he isn't capable or using either direction. Or that he won't. Power unused is impotent There must always be an enemy and always be a demonstration.

Certainly - Exactly why the Cycle of Repression works. Especially when operated by a government. It's had 50 years of practice and finally found it's niche since Carlos Marighella and others formulated that strategy. Come to think of it the cycle some times circle of repression is mostly used by governments these days. That should get old Carlos rolling over in his grave.