Introducing John Allison, Libertarian, Objectivist, a man for our times?
http://fee.org/freeman/curing-our-lea...
I've been calling him George Allison here and there by mistake. The former President of the BB&T Bank who had all of his 30,000 employees read Economics In One Lesson by Hazlitt and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand as a condition of employee training and ran the bank into perhaps the one success story of that industry using Randian principles. I'm off to order his books at present, There are two and I didn't spare the pennies using Amazon Prime for faster delivery - but here's a section of the interview which addresses the often argued place of subjective thought in an objective world.
“Objectivity” in this context simply means making logical decisions based on the facts of reality. Obviously, in many situations, we do not have all the facts, nor can we necessarily integrate all the factors that might impact the outcome. So there is a subjective (subconscious and nonmathematical) component based on past experiences that can be part of objective decision making.
However, the dictionary defines subjective as based on personal feelings, taste, and opinions. While there are some individuals who can be successful decision makers because their subconscious integrations are naturally logical, this type of mind is rare. Making decisions on personal, subjective whims often leads to disaster."
Mr. Allison is a former board member of Ayn Rand Institute and at present the President of the Cato Institutes and head of their Economics and Finance Area.
So far I'm impressed and wondering why i don't see his name suggested as a Candidate for much higher office and worthy of support by a wide range of anti-socialist thinkers and doers.
Question: Why are we not seeing people of this caliber instead of the dregs and leavings of the current two faced cesspool of failure? Are we that much in thralldom to the present system of despair with only the excrement of Rinos and Dinos from which to choose?
Professional Biography
https://en.wikipedia.or/wiki/John_A._Allison_IV
I've been calling him George Allison here and there by mistake. The former President of the BB&T Bank who had all of his 30,000 employees read Economics In One Lesson by Hazlitt and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand as a condition of employee training and ran the bank into perhaps the one success story of that industry using Randian principles. I'm off to order his books at present, There are two and I didn't spare the pennies using Amazon Prime for faster delivery - but here's a section of the interview which addresses the often argued place of subjective thought in an objective world.
“Objectivity” in this context simply means making logical decisions based on the facts of reality. Obviously, in many situations, we do not have all the facts, nor can we necessarily integrate all the factors that might impact the outcome. So there is a subjective (subconscious and nonmathematical) component based on past experiences that can be part of objective decision making.
However, the dictionary defines subjective as based on personal feelings, taste, and opinions. While there are some individuals who can be successful decision makers because their subconscious integrations are naturally logical, this type of mind is rare. Making decisions on personal, subjective whims often leads to disaster."
Mr. Allison is a former board member of Ayn Rand Institute and at present the President of the Cato Institutes and head of their Economics and Finance Area.
So far I'm impressed and wondering why i don't see his name suggested as a Candidate for much higher office and worthy of support by a wide range of anti-socialist thinkers and doers.
Question: Why are we not seeing people of this caliber instead of the dregs and leavings of the current two faced cesspool of failure? Are we that much in thralldom to the present system of despair with only the excrement of Rinos and Dinos from which to choose?
Professional Biography
https://en.wikipedia.or/wiki/John_A._Allison_IV
Not to say that some people are very much into Objectivist thinking- just not enough to make a difference to politics and the general culture.
Even my spellchecker has Objectivist lit up in red.
Carter lost by a landslide.
The far worse Obama? A freaking reelection!
The thought of the so obviously corrupt Broom Hillary following in the Presidebt's wake makes my stomach turn.
Now I'm thinking anyone would be way better than that lying snake..
Because a long-term viewpoint is required. There are very few people in the world who can take a thoughtful, over-arching approach to decision-making. And many of those are easily influenced by friends or distracted by technology. [SQUIRREL]
It is a rare person indeed who is grounded in reality to the point that their convictions determine their course of action.
Vote veteran someone that puts America before ANY party.
No double standards put DC politicians on Obamacare and SS.Thanks for your support and vote.Pass the word. mrpresident2016.com
But all of that aside, Allison has a problem separating subjective from subconscious and understanding that there's a big difference,particularly in relationship to objective decisions or analysis.
The subconscious is programmed by the conscious mind. If objective all the time, the subconscious cannot hold subjective thoughts.
Objectivity does not require omniscience. One only needs to rely only on facts as we know them at any point in time.
As for being limited only to finance and banking what else? In his business they had people that specialized in the various other forms of endeavor. Some of them probably knew the difference between a four leg and three leg pig!
Just like other banks, there is no interest to speak of on savings, but they do have interest free checking provided you have a certain amount in the form of a CD or Money Market, which is the same racket as other banks. They get to use your money while paying virtually nothing to you for the privilege. If Allison's banking practices are any different, I haven't detected them.
I said this before. Objectivists could never have founded the United States. That took smart charismatic leaders of principle who recognized that they could not ever get everything they wanted in any society of men.
How the hell did some one that bright get over looked is there a hidden dirt little secret. Who else had not onloy bought 30,000 of the text books Rand, Hazlitt etc.and not only taught the course but used it as a work improvement but a work requirement. What was IP again?
I'm thinking of funding a bunch of those toe bandages. No wonder the left outnumbers us.
So all that aside. To tell the truth I found the Mizes etc school even more convoluted and hard to fathom or credit than some others I've waded through and to less purpose. and found nothing to connect Allison's words and actions so if you lead me to water I will drink but I'm not going searching for another spring to no purpose, the water is just fine where I'm at....What was IP again?
I'm 20 books behind now and and another dozen on the way...However...
The question remains ...how the hell did we lose all the bright successful people who are obviously in our camp while the dregs and leavings end up running for office and it doesn't matter spit which one of them win?
My guess is too much narrow, myopic thinking that don't mind getting their teeth kicked in every two and four years as long as their precious dogma stays intact. Didn't cooperate and didn't graduate....but let the social promotions take the lead.
Am I being to rough after all I am just a simple soldier....that doesn't do dialectics.