It's metaphoric and political rah rah something like the Seahawks fans saying kill the umpire when they lose a game....Really! Violent? Perish forbid. Besides it's not murder and that is illegal and immoral. Would you accept - "Rebuke them all let Galt sort them out?"
Your eight year old may have a tad bit more mental ability than some of the teachers in the schools these days. (Some exceptions you know who you are.)
A little violent aren't we Michael? Remember what Asimov said in the Foundation series" Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, since all else has already failed". While we may end up there someday, I would hope we are all collectively smarter than they are...
Liberals have a metaphysical view of economics. They consider that fundamental economic principals are inventions rather than discoveries and as such can be modified, adjusted or ignored at whim. The reality is that economics follows basic and fundamental laws that are as real and as inescapable as the laws of gravity or thermodynamics. This is an uncomfortable reality and liberals hate uncomfortable reality. For example, the ultimate result of establishing a minimum wage is the decline in the value of the dollar. This decline is intentional because paying debts with future dollars that have declined in value is the equivalent of getting a discount. There are many ways to reduce the value of currency and minimum wage is just one of them. Printing dollars with nothing behind them is another.
I understand that, which is funny in a sick way that she even bothers to try to coax the middle class into voting for her by promising security...there is nothing less secure then a Democrap in the WH, closely followed by the Republicraps..
Herb, I think it is because by masking it in mystery and doubletalk, then they believe only THEY have the answers to save us all from the last gangs ill planned spending spree. Then they start their own spree so the next guy has something to blather about. It's only money..
Why is this even an issue? I could teach the folly to an eight year old using Monopoly money and Monopoly properties. If you spend more than you take in, of anything, you will eventually run out. I never understood why that was so @##@! hard to understand.
The one epic fail in this whole argument: the notion that Hillary Clinton actually keeps her word! This is pure political pandering to the center. She has no intention of keeping such a promise.
Hillary people must have missed her speeches about 'tax enhancements.' All the embellished enhancements aside what they want is government control of people as opposed to citizens controlling government. The cannon fodder and baby factory folk in fly over country solemnly look up as she passed overhead and think "What an amazing azz hole."
Bernie Sanders Democrats do want a liberal "revolution" and tax increases. Hillary Clinton Democrats do not want a liberal revolution or tax increases. The article imples Clinton Democrats actually want increased spending so a no-tax pledge is a mistake for them.
The article correctly identifies the Democratic problem of expecting taxes on a small group of people to fund programs for large groups of people.
Not to mention the BBC. Seven million that's normal for them it's their version of donate more or we'll shut down. that's one over one thousandth of Soros or Lewis and one ten thousandth give or take of Gates. Just for starters......but first they are talking about sequestering retirement accounts...poor little rich kids playing see how stupid people really are they why sure otherwise why would they be socialists?
I'm not so sure. There's the IRAs, 401Ks, other savings, land to be seized and sold to the Chinese, debt to be charged to future generations. Both Dems and Repubs are pretty creative when it comes to wealth confiscation.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
the new line is K*ll them all let Galt sort them out. Metaphorically and politically of course.
The article correctly identifies the Democratic problem of expecting taxes on a small group of people to fund programs for large groups of people.