All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's called 'raiding' One strong and one week primary candidate in the opposite side. A solid sure thing candidate on our side. A bunch re-register in time to vote in the sap. Then when its too late switch back. the trick is if you are oging to play act the other side you have to have a strong stomach an/or a good sense of humor.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago
    remember Rush's operation chaos which involved Rs voting
    in a primary to influence the D results? . I did that once,
    as an individual. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wouldn't it be kewl for a bunch of sitting hither and yon to actually start something control who was the next Prez and VP. Or at least block the beast.

    I was thinking about polls and so forth.. Slip the word around ourside to just say Carly and Bobby or she can run on her own with no help from us.....Why? Because I don't like you. right in some pollsters face.....or why? Nobodies business but that's the way it's going down. Be a lot of stained BVDs when that poll came out.....Not saying Jack about anything then laughing in their face.

    One of those if i told you I would have to execute you laughs....Just turn your back on them slam the door and try for broken nose.

    Between the usual fifty fifty split ...we would hold the keys to the kingdom. They are too doo doo dumb to give it up to the other side so their big advantage doesn't mean squat. Really it's like one third, one third, one third and half of theirs don't vote so let's see 1/6th to 1/6th and we get to pick the winner. LMAO.

    Assuming 50 50 of those who vote how many votes do you really need to win...somewhere between one and two. 55 to 45 split you would need to bring in 11 in percentage terms of those who really vote.

    Now tell the truth would you vote for Hillary or Carly given that scenario? Add in VP Bobby it would be real street theater...Just got to pare him away from that VAT crap....wouldn't be hard if her got to ride herd on something better.


    Ah it's almost two am I've been up 22 hours and it's time to dream the impossible dreams and then make them....schnooooooooorrrrrrreeee tomorrows sunshine.....
    Reply | Permalink  
    • johnpe1 replied 8 years, 5 months ago
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Can't be helped if vote write in on the ballot and if you are in a winner take all state....you might want to check that out first.....my state doesn't even keep track of the totals for write in's third parties etc. just dumps all the votes in the winner take all column
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Sure that's exactly what I have in mind with the Carly and Bobby ploy what I'm really considering is how to maximize and grow the number of votes against the worst choice since their are only going to be two worst choices available in any case. if that doesn't work I'm going to vote for None Of The Above.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    To The Contrary or in bad French Au Contraire. (Before the Paris incidents i would have said Croak Croak Rivet) By not voting you are voting in the undervote. People who register and don't vote or just don't register. Even the skewed Obamastistics which no longer count registered not voting isn't covering that up.

    Eligibile to vote as compared to actually voted runs near 50% in off election years and roughly 35% in Presidential election years. Which means that percentage is saying "None Of The Above. Kind of kills the value of 'landslide' and 'mandate' when they have to steal votes using winner take all and all doesn't mean zip.

    Welcome to the silent almost majority
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A. He's a Republican
    B. He is therefore a supporter of the RINOs
    C. He advocates Nancy Pelosi's second favorite tax that of VAT on businesses only which translates directly into increased consumer costs plus cost of collecting FOR the government.

    three strikes your out and take Cruz with him.

    Compared to the others is not saying much and certainly not saying enough. The rest of your comment i wish I had included that's strike four and five for Randy Paul and one thumb up for you.

    Ah I forgot and he already quit he's running for the Senate again and said, "the end is in sight."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rand is a fake Constitutionalist? Relative to the others...I see him as the most Constitutionalist. He's unelectable for President, certainly. The people want to be led by force. They want a bad daddy. Again.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "I wonder how we will act when they get to Israel and begin to invade"
    I think they pose zero threat to Isreal. (I never thought they'd control any territory and I don't understand how they did it, so I could be wrong.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I wonder how we will act when they get to Israel and begin
    to invade. . could that be their waterloo? -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "right now, of course, we have this "war" being waged against us by ISIS"
    I don't think there's any war. They're a bunch of criminals. A militia, along the lines of what the Founders imagined, with everyhousehold having guns, emergency repair equipment, and/or emergency medical, ISIS wouldn't have a chance. Sure they can commit murder. I don't have a plan to stop murder.

    I will point out I could be wrong b/c I never though ISIS would get this powerful. For that reason, I'd be fine having a standing army that is as expensive as our greatest enemies spend. But what I really want is a well regulated militia and a very limited standing army--- an no declaring war b/c of evil criminals.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    the L in ISIL is Levant, the name of the territory I cited. . memory
    was slow this afternoon. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    wellsir, I love you too! . I will ask for your analysis when
    you have the time. . I suspect that you and Zen are thinking
    in the same sort of way -- guilt by association. . please
    cite examples at your leisure. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    he can quit speaking over everyone's head since he just announced a campaign for his own Senate Seat and said 'the end is in sight.' What seems to be over everyone's head is he's another fake conservative and fake Constitutionalist but a real live garden variety RINO and that goes for his buddy Cruz doble.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 5 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes, I think it is. Many who identify themselves as conservative are delusional. We go round and round on that here. It's an interesting topic because what choice does the average American schmo have when voting, etc? When Rand Paul speaks during the debates I usually utter, "Well...that went over everybody's head..." Haha...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo