The UN has always been a well of poison to our culture, overflowing with jealous hatred and eager to demolish everything we represent. Why we have tolerated this corrupt entity for as long as we have, I don't understand. The increased danger we now face is the eagerness of the White House resident to give the UN mandate equal force to our own law.

With regard to the Muslim refugees, it's always been easier for residents to accept newcomers who have different language, dress, food, and celebrations, so long as those arrivals welcome the basic tenets of the society that is their new home. The problem with Muslims, radical or not, is that they can't accept the principles of American society, and are therefore enemies of our people, even if they have no hostile intent.

When you deliberately force hostile cultures together, nothing good results. The malign minds behind forced invasion and unenforced borders intend to destroy everything the United States is founded on, replacing it with a socialist state under authoritarian rule.

Send them all to his neighborhood in Portugal, and stop all immigration to the US from Portugal.
Meddler!.

Specifically targeting countries with mixed economies is a sure fire way to illicit a negative response from their inhabitants. This idiot has tinkered with some kind of destabilizing revolution in his undeveloped mind and he should be ousted for attempting to influence our policies. His obvious goal is cannibalizing capitalism.

How disgusting. We should pull out of the U.N. I
did think that maybe we could organize a military
unit of Syrian refugees to go into combat against
ISIS, (under American command, of course), but I
have been persuaded that it wouldn't work; it could be infiltrated with Islamist terrorists. I
think the best we could do is set up some refu-
gee camps in the Mideast. (Why should we do
even that? Well, we do have a general interest
that evil should not triumph in the world> And
that way, we could have a few allies against the
terrorists).

Ah, yes. Altruism at its finest.
If only hell existed and I had a vote for who would go there, and I had a voice in determining the punishment. No! That would be breaking most of the rules I live by -- but it is pleasant to speculate.

"He happens to be the former president of Socialist International, a worldwide confederacy of more than 160 socialist parties from 100 countries that pushes open borders to create "one world government."

I wonder if he lives in a gated community protected by armed guards. I somehow doubt he's invited any of these refugees to come stay at his house. Such is the case with all these power-mongers: they're all afflicted with chronic NIMB (Not In My Backyard) syndrome.

An end to federal welfare stops refugees, illegal immigrants - and socialists - cold.

has any of these people stated who would give them jobs so they could take care of them selves? i know that the brainless one 0 has not addressed that subject. since these missing links have no knowledge of living in a 21st century environment. when they arrive here where do they live who feeds them, need i go further as i am sure you can add more questions about their welfare your selves. all the do gooders do not THINK. they just have knee jerk reactions to the situation. they should be left where they are to fend for them selves as best they can.