Wow, that is amazing. You are another whole group of people that I’ve heard exist but never have had the opportunity to speak to. So you really want a society without rules, laws or structure at all? I’m sorry to tell you that is not objectivism at all, that is anarchy. Ayn Rand was describing why these forms (or lack thereof) government is not in your best interest.

We need a judicial branch of the government, without it… I just take your stuff because I’m smarter and have more guns.

Kittyhawk,

Seems to me that the term anarchy means different things to different people. I for one do not want anarchy due to that fact that no one will be able to conduct business in a constantly changing environment. You seem to be crossing anarchy with libertarianism, I don’t subscript to the libertarianism philosophy 100% ether, I agree with a lot but not all. I’m an objectionist, meaning I’m doing what is in my best interest, having a community in a state of anarchy is not in my best interest.

Anarchy is not a form of government but a lack of government; anarchy would lead to our enslavement or death. Without organization we can’t defend our boarders; without a small federal government, we don’t exist as a country. Anarchy is an excuse for martial law…

Ayn Rand rejected both libertarianism and anarchist, I agree as it seems like a fantasy land where we have no rules at all. Without the experience of having children, I might have agreed but wanting an environment where my children can grow up to their fullest potential is important to me. The best chance of that happening is a stable small government that provides only the basics like national security and due process.

Mitch

All of the above. The presence of anarchy means I Must carry and be prepared to use a weapon at all times without benefit at times of surety but with the benefit of not being prosecuted. No government means no government and that includes no vigilantes.

Gives people like me a clear and certain edge fo we will use any weapon available including forming a new government. Whose to stop us?

Is that your opinion or based on something found elsewhere? Either way personal conjecture, wishful thinking, tea leaf reading a great many of your claims demand some proofs...I'll be happy to see the explanations with cites and sources.

I hasten to add that personal knowledge based on a background in areas not all of us have examined, researched or accepted instruction in are just as valid a source of opinion as cites or sources from others. Although to be truthful I give no credence to the social science crowd and much more to the hard science groups depending on proven veracity. My own area of Political Science and History has taught me that much.

"I think is not the same as I know."

At what point does government lose it's legitimacy. Case in point . Refugees vs immigrants. As of today it's 26 a clear majority. 26 have withdrawn their consent to be governed on this issue.

Which leaves the government of Obama in peril as it's legitimacy has been repudiated by a clear vote of no confidence.

How many of the other states the remaining 24 are scheduled to receive refugees or immigrants?

How many of the minority states are not scheduled to receive any of the immigrants. How many are being economically blackmailed by the Obama Government? How many have been threatened and withstood those pressures?

How many of you trust, really trust, the Government to conduct a proper vetting or to follow some plan that puts those more immediately capable of passing a security check at the top of the list? If it's speed you want and security that's how you get it.

Or will Obamists say one thing and do another to retain power perhaps with more of care less Kerry's secret side deals and by the way. Wha this happening now this crisis has claimed the front pages from that crisis?

The best course of action is to follow the footsteps of the parliamentary governments. When the nation has no confidence - resign. Admit your failure and admit your shame. You've already committed political suicide.