How Democratic Is Your Name?

Posted by fivedollargold 11 years, 9 months ago to Politics
29 comments | Share | Flag

This is kind of creepy, but demonstrates the sort of analytics the Dems are undertaking.


All Comments

  • Posted by kategladstone 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Yes — but there are some other Americans with the first name "Ayn." Presumably they were named — or named themselves — after her ... yet the majority of them are Democrats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    With all due respect, CircuitGuy, but I think you missed my point, which isn't so much the country, but is to illustrate the reversal of terms used by statists as pointed out by Orwell. War is peace, peace is war. You indicated a conspiratorial premiss to my post and I offered a real world example to illustrate the point. There are many examples in our time, including naming bills brought before our legislators. Rand also illustrates this in AS.

    Yes, this thread is off topic, but red v blue was brought up and I threw in my 2 cents. Since this thread is going off topic even more, I'll leave it alone from here. You or someone else can have the last word.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by KYFHO 11 years, 9 months ago
    OK, sometimes I can really spend waaay too much time on silly stuff like this...but....I can only find the 2nd most popular name, John. Anyone figure out what is #1? And would this be considered racist if created by a conservative?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are quite correct. The TV networks used to use red for Dems and blue for the GOP. However, the association between "Red" and "Democrat" became too embarrassing for the liberal press, so they reversed it. Not sure the year, maybe 80's.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thanks for ferreting this out, Robbie53024. It is not what I've read before but I'll take it for what it is except the "Dixiecrat" theory in the last paragraph.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It rings true, but much less interesting than the Orwellian conspiracy explanation that some people on this site apply to everything.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess my kids being opposed to attending church services (one of the parameters they measured) sounded spammy to someone.. LMAO.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I agree. And blue is the color of the conservative party in Britain. It always seemed backwards to have blue be Democrat.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    From Wiki - so take it for what it is:

    The advent of color television prompted television news reporters to rely on color-coded electoral maps, though sources conflict as to the conventions they followed. One source claims that in the six elections prior to 2000 every Democrat but one had been coded red. It further claims that from 1976 to 2004, the broadcast networks, in an attempt to avoid favoritism in color-coding, standardized on the convention of alternating every four years between blue and red the color used for the incumbent party.[8][9]

    According to another source, in 1976, John Chancellor, the anchorman for NBC Nightly News, asked his network's engineers to construct a large illuminated map of the USA. The map was placed in the network's election-night news studio. If Jimmy Carter, the Democratic candidate that year, won a state, it would light up in red; if Gerald Ford, the Republican, carried a state, it would light up in blue. The feature proved to be so popular that four years later all three major television networks would use colors to designate the states won by the presidential candidates on Election Night, though not all using the same color scheme. NBC continued to use the color scheme employed in 1976 for several years. NBC newsman David Brinkley famously referred to the 1980 election map outcome as showing Ronald Reagan's 44-state landslide as resembling a "suburban swimming pool".[10]

    CBS, from 1984 on, used the opposite scheme: blue for Democrats, red for Republicans. ABC used yellow for one major party and blue for the other in 1976. However, in 1980 and 1984, ABC used red for Republicans and blue for Democrats. In 1980, when independent John B. Anderson ran a relatively high-profile campaign as an independent candidate, at least one network provisionally indicated that they would use yellow if he were to win a state. Similarly in 1992 and 1996, at least one network would have used yellow to indicate a state won by Ross Perot.

    By 1996, color schemes were relatively mixed, as CNN, CBS, ABC, and The New York Times referred to Democratic states with the color blue and Republican ones as red, while Time and The Washington Post used an opposite scheme.[11][12][13]

    In the days following the 2000 election, whose outcome was unclear for some time after election day, major media outlets began conforming to the same color scheme because the electoral map was continually in view, and conformity made for easy and instant viewer comprehension. On Election Night that year, there was no coordinated effort to code Democratic states blue and Republican states red; the association gradually emerged. Partly as a result of this eventual and near-universal color-coding, the terms "red states" and "blue states" entered popular usage in the weeks following the 2000 presidential election. After the results were final, journalists stuck with the color scheme, as The Atlantic's December 2001 cover story by David Brooks entitled, "One Nation, Slightly Divisible", illustrated.[14]

    Thus, red and blue became fixed in the media and in many people's minds, despite the fact that no "official" color choices had been made by the parties.[15] As a result, the Blue color attribution has returned to its earliest historical roots in the U.S.: as the Republicans have assumed the legacy of the old Confederacy since their takeover by the Dixiecrats in the 1970s, the Democrats have inherited the Blue of the old Union. However, Archie Tse, The New York Times graphics editor who made the choice when the Times published its first color presidential election map in 2000, provided a different rationale: "Both Republican and red start with the letter R," he said.[16]
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You are correct Snezzy. Red is communist. So, why the Orwellian reversal of terms in this case? Well, the socialists/communists/statists have been doing this term reversal all along to cover their stink (as in Democratic Peoples Republic of North Korea). I can't recall the article or I'd cite it here, but I read that the color reversal was actually used by a left wing "journalist" during one of our elections and it stick from there.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 9 months ago
    It's hard to get much out of this b/c the names I tried are split almost evenly. This is why I reject statements like "the poor voted XYZ" or "engineers voted XYZ". When you look at the numbers they're usually split

    My name was 48% Democratic, but I'm registered Democrat. My wife's and kids' names are slightly Democratic.

    Both of my kids are opposed to attending UU Sunday school regularly. I'm not sure if that makes them more Democrat or Republican.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by kategladstone 11 years, 9 months ago
    If you want a REAL surprise, enter the first name "Ayn" and check the statistics ...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 11 years, 9 months ago
    Cool! thanks for the link. Very amusing. Of course, the fallacy is the collectivist identity of statistical populations with individuals. In fact, my name and my daughter's are both against the trends, hers very strongly so.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ Maphesdus 11 years, 9 months ago
    Dang, "Sephiroth" wasn't in their database... =/
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo