America 2.0, by Robert Gore
Let’s assume everything collapses. The skyscraper of cards tumbles; parasitic, unsustainable governments fail; chaos reigns. For all its flaws, living today, especially for those of us in the more advanced economies, is a lot easier than during any prior time. As late as 1900 US life expectancy was less than fifty years. However, there are reasons to root for collapse; it would present a huge opportunity to keep the good parts of the present age and build upon them, while at the same time changing the things that will have been manifestly responsible for the collapse, i.e., the incompetence and corruption of governments. However, to avail ourselves of the opportunities, it is necessary to consider what will replace that which has failed. SLL will kick off the process with a few modest proposals.
This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the link above.
This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the link above.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Such a collapse would only give some Marxist like our imperial "I'm not an emperor" actor a much desired excuse to seize dictatorial power with an "emergency" martial law declaration.
But I'm afraid such a collapse is unavoidably inevitable.
What will really matter is who is in the White House when that collapse happens.
The Constitution is not the problem...let's focus on fixing the government. The rest should fall back into place.
There is no guarantee that collapse of them monetary system would lead to less costly and intrusive gov't. I would rather strive for reform directly, skipping the collapse of the financial system.
Probably good for another couple of centuries... Somehow the ability to suppress the irrepressible urge of some to dominate others and dictate how all should live seems beyond our means.
Everybody wants to be King.
Respectfully,
O.A.
I assume that government would impose some "services" that were not voluntary.
If so, I would want an opt-out provision for every person, so that any person or people who thought that the government was not acting in a way that was acceptable, the person could withhold consent and be placed on a pay for service basis for all government "services." This would encourage free market options to all government action. If government can't provide service that "customers" want to pay for, then it should go out of business.
Government is just a tool, and if there are better tools available, then government should cease to exist.