Military drawdown
Posted by Robbie53024 12 years, 6 months ago to Government
My black helicopter has been buzzing since I first heard the news.
1) Reduction of a standing army so that there is less of a "resistance force" for any governmental action.
2) Purging those that don't show the proper "attitude" to support a governmental lockdown.
3) Punishment to red states (by reducing/eliminating military bases) due to reduced military base needs.
1) Reduction of a standing army so that there is less of a "resistance force" for any governmental action.
2) Purging those that don't show the proper "attitude" to support a governmental lockdown.
3) Punishment to red states (by reducing/eliminating military bases) due to reduced military base needs.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/02/24/21...
Looks like 2 red states are being targeted. Coincidence?
Yes, reducing the national guard would concern me, but this isn't up to the Fed gov't. They can reduce/eliminate funding, but it is ultimately up to the state governors. They control the size and make up of the nat gd.
The part that bothered me was the reduction of national guard.
This thinking that technology is less costly is absurd. One Tomahawk missile is what $10 Million? And we lob those out like they were candy.
No war was ever won without occupying the terrain, and never will be. You need boots to occupy.