17

What would you consider the number one priority in the making of Atlas Shrugged Part III?

Posted by sdesapio 12 years ago to Entertainment
751 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

We want to hear from you. What would you consider the number one priority in the making of Atlas Shrugged Part III?

A. Casting
B. Getting the message of Atlas Shrugged right
C. Cinematography
D. Special Effects
E. Hiring the right Director
F. Other

Leave your answer in the comments below.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 23.
  • Posted by StevenH 12 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Nomark's point is why I think a movie about the 20th Century Motor Co. gets the message across better. You take some honest hard working people and put them into a system where they come to believe it is in their best interest to murder an old woman because she needs expensive medical care. You can't tie an emotional scene to a message any better than that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by NannyBooBoo 12 years ago
    It seems that I would be echoing what I see on most posts - bring the cast of Part 1 back. They nailed it. I liked that you did not feel the need to dummy down anything. Stick to the first cast and follow the book.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by medeforest 12 years ago
    Loved Reardon V1.0, loved laying track scene. So, most important is conveying the message through vivid, positive images. Good luck, can't wait to see ASPIII
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Babyjake5 12 years ago
    B - the movie is pointless without the message. So far the "I'm going to stop the engine of the world" has no meaning
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Kentlphilli 12 years ago
    E. Find a director that understands the basic philosophy of the book but like the book is a practionier and not a radical with their own agenda. This is the only way to guarantee the message will be correct.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DonThorntonJr 12 years ago
    yes - all of the above

    I liked the part I cast better but using an all new cast in part III would be a novel idea and keep with the theme from part I to part II.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by GreedyBastard 12 years ago
    I have to say that "B" (Getting the message right") comes closest to what I believe is THE number one priority. However, I would tweak, or revise the statement slightly to something like, " GETTING THE RIGHT MESSAGE OUT, TO THOSE WHO STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS AT STAKE, BUT ARE STILL REACHABLE."
    In other words, pre, and post, release advertising needs to target and inspire the youth, Hispanic, Black, and "middle-class" citizen groups, to see viewing of this movie as an Imperative. Possible ad line:
    "America has grown long on problems and short on solutions. Learn and understand what "Atlas Shrugged" presents, and YOU can be THE SOLUTION, and not just another part of the problem."
    We HAVE TO REACH A MUCH BROADER AUDIENCE THAN JUST THE FAITHFUL, if we are to gain ground quickly enough to pull America back from the brink of oblivion.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by PJV 12 years ago
    B> Message
    ...And make the film at least 2 hours long or more. While I love the first 2 movies, they seemed too short.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by gilmichelini 12 years ago
    E) In the previous two, you had the effects and the cinematography but it lacked in strong writing and therefore acting which ultimately falls to the director. Everything rises and falls on leadership.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by mako887 12 years ago
    I would have to say that '"A" - "casting" is my #1 priority regarding the making of AS3. My wife and I were disappointed that the ENTIRE CAST from AS1 was dumped and recast for AS2. A close #2 priority would be "B" getting the message right. You've done a good job so far. Don't backslide. Looking forward to AS3.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by HarryH 12 years ago
    Make sure you have the same actors. That is very important to the credibility of the storyline.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by StevenH 12 years ago
    I think you should forget about making Part III and instead make a movie of the story of the 20th Century Motor Co. as told by the stowaway. I think this story gets the message across in a way that people who haven't read the book will understand. I also think it is a story that can much easier be made into a commercially successful movie on a small budget.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by monsterdoc 12 years ago
    B. The cast from part II was brilliant. Get the theme correct; it isn't too difficult as Ayn spelled it out multiple times in the book and in other forms.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by vido 12 years ago
    B, of course. Atlas Shrugged is about struggling and building, and being free.
    These are the times governments around the world are enslaving people, and this message has to be transmitted.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Capri142 12 years ago
    B.

    It has to be Ayn Rands message but it also has to be done well
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by DMWalker 12 years ago
    In order: B,A,E,C,D,F
    The only "mistake" I perceive so far was the cast change from I to II. Love the movies, anxious for III.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ ratman20 12 years ago
    B. That of course is the most important... casting if I could be a part of it. xD
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bevhcol 12 years ago
    Worth The Money To Hire A Professional Casting Person Then LISTEN To Them:)
    Bev h
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ zigory 12 years ago
    As to B, I recommend to the filmmakers "Adapting Atlas Shrugged to Film" by Jeff Britting and "Galt's Speech in Five Sentences (and Forty Questions)" by Allan Gotthelf from the book "Essays on Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged" edited by Robert Mayhew. In terms of condensing Galt's Speech, Mr. Gotthelf's essay may prove invaluable.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by bevhcol 12 years ago
    Casting - R U Kidding Me? In This Day And Age You Can't Find a Clearly Strong But Appealing Dagny?

    Cinematography has been great
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by TxAg69 12 years ago
    I was disappointed that the original cast was not used to film Part 2. I think they were great in their respective roles and should have been used in 2. I would like to see you attempt to use the original cast for Part 3. I think that would part of "Getting it Right"! The rest of your work was really great in the making of Part 1 and Part 2!!!!!!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo