What would you consider the number one priority in the making of Atlas Shrugged Part III?
We want to hear from you. What would you consider the number one priority in the making of Atlas Shrugged Part III?
A. Casting
B. Getting the message of Atlas Shrugged right
C. Cinematography
D. Special Effects
E. Hiring the right Director
F. Other
Leave your answer in the comments below.
A. Casting
B. Getting the message of Atlas Shrugged right
C. Cinematography
D. Special Effects
E. Hiring the right Director
F. Other
Leave your answer in the comments below.
Previous comments...
I want the original cast back!!!
Part II was just not a believable as Part I.
Do not bring Part II cast members back . They let me down. With the proper Cast (A) and Director (E) it is possible to not only get the message correct but to make sure those people who still are oblivious to what is happening finally see the light. A dynamic John Galt actor is needed.
B. This is a given. In the last part I'd really like to see the scene where Rearden grabs his gun in his pocket to protect Ragnar from the police. You have to nail the Ragnar character and that whole scene.
A - casting. Dagny - Samantha Mathis destroyed the whole concept of Dagny as a strong, independet woman in charge. Taylor Shilling did great job.
I was terribly disappointed that the entire cast was replaced. The new cast was not as good and did not have the magic & closeness of those in Part I. There was great chemistry between Dagny Taggart (Taylor Schilling) and Henry Rearden (Grant Bowler) when they were together, and strong characters when acting apart. At first, I thought Ms. Schilling would be too attractive to be believable as a head of a major company. But her sometimes cold, business persona dispelled that fear; truly excellent! Mr. Bowler’s performance was rock solid and totally believable as a CEO of a steel firm. He was also not just another handsome face, but a no-nonsense, man’s man who was a force to be reckoned with. Then there was Graham Beckel’s Ellis Wyatt: unique and charming when professionally impressed, and ruthless when agitated. Jsu Garcia’s Francisco d'Anconia had so many facets to his personality, I don’t know how he kept them all straight and believable, sometimes in the same scene. The cast of Part II, with few isolated exceptions, paled in comparison.
Regarding Cinematography: Part I had an earth-tone color scheme and richness about it which said ‘quality’. By contrast, Part II came across as brightly lit, sterile, and somehow artificial. The feel/tone/visuals of Part II made me feel more like I was watching a prime time TV show; it didn’t ‘feel’ right, not like Part I.
I'm glad to see others feel similarly and that I'm not the only one with these perceptions.
E. Director: I'd love to see Darren Aronofsky direct Part III if you have the budget. If not, check out a new young director from here in Colorado named Jamin Winans. His feature, "Ink", blew me away.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamin_Winan...
Though it appears like B is the winner based on comment count, a few folks pointed out the obvious: what good is a perfect message poorly executed?
The original cast was superior to the 2nd in every way. Samantha Mathis moped and looked dour while Taylor Shilling gave me goose bumps when she told Francisco that she was going to win. The score for AS1 was gorgeous and sounded like Goldsmith at times. I bought that CD too and listen to it often.
Also- I would LOVE to see Anna Silk for Lilian Rearden...
Then A and C
Having some continuity with same actors of previous films would be great. (the Atlas 1 Actors were far better than 2)
I've loved both movies but shuddered during the "Fox news" bit in Part 2. I think it's vital that you don't try to align the message and philosophy of Atlas Shrugged with any current political party. Neither the republicans nor democrats even remotely reflect the message you are trying to get across. Please don't discredit Ayn's philosophy by associating it to a specific party, both of which are pretty corrupt.
Really looking forward to Part 3, best of luck with the movie!!!
Among other things, the difference in age between the actors in the two movies made it seem like around 15 years had passed between the end of part I to the start of II. Was this intentional? I don't remember any such time lapse being mentioned in the book.
One specific casting request: bring back Armin Schimmerman. The man was born to play an Atlas Shrugged bureaucrat, but all he got was a cameo in part I.
Load more comments...