

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
But with this venue? Her Royal Highness Queen Hillary I, loony old Bernie Sanders and the slate of also-rans?
No thanks. That's one snake pit I don't need to look into.
Q - There are accusations of you cheating on your wife. How do you respond to that?
A - Let me tell you; I have to be honest with you; the first week of our marriage we were truly close and honest with each other, and we were honest with the American people. Truthfully, there is no basis for this accusation.
I gave it a 0 waste of time and an insult to my intelligence before that leftist spew of blather actually came on. .
I'm not a complete masochist though. ;^)
Unless the commentators "sweeten" it up for her, e.g., "Well now Hilary, you know you have received some negative comments from the Republicans concerning the unfortunate Benghazi event that occurred several years ago, and what would you say to the voters tonight?"
Translates to:
-in the historical past and not really relevant today
-blame the Republicans, they are always after you
-"unfortunate event", yes, just an event that was unfortunate so "what difference does it make now!"
I seriously doubt any male commentator will be caught "roughing her up" and that puts her already ahead of the game.
Unless- Hilary makes a fool of herself, now that might ignite some interest.
Load more comments...