12

Praying to the Porcelain God, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years, 7 months ago to Economics
30 comments | Share | Flag

At the corporate level, the exhaustion of productive investment opportunities prompts executives to either return funds to shareholders through dividends or to use that cash flow (sometimes augmented by cheap debt), to speculate on the company’s share price. Hillary Clinton has made political hay about corporations buying their own shares instead of making productive investments. The world is glutted with raw materials, intermediate goods, finished goods, and consumer goods, the visible manifestation of return on investment equilibrating to the artificially low cost of funds. Glutted markets and falling asset prices are screaming, “No more!” In what would Ms. Clinton have corporations invest? Undoubtedly there are elements of self-enrichment and bull market crowd psychology at play when executives authorize share buybacks. However, returning capital to shareholders is also an admission that they don’t have any better ideas of what to do with the money. Ms. Clinton doesn’t either.

This is an excerpt. Please click the above link for the rest of the article.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Why not? You pay a fee for them to protect your money from nosy parkers. T Bills are routinely sold at zero per cent. The money may lose value to inflation, devaluation and the repudiation cycle but you get it back with only that loss. Bank will get you FDIC 250,000 max. no matter how many millions the government swindled. Unless you set up a bunch of LLC's etc. otherwise it's one time one account and might be paid in savings bonds.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 9 years, 7 months ago
    Excellent!
    'If interest rates are free to fluctuate, the interest rate will equilibrate that demand and supply.'
    Well put. I suggest, there is no such thing as a correct interest rate. When not fixed by edict, rates fluctuate with time and vary across the economy according to the borrower and across lenders.
    Negative (real) interest rates-
    not anything new, it is what happens when interest rates get, or are held, below inflation. Even with low inflation as in Switzerland sometimes, when including bank charges the net interest rate can drop below zero.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 7 months ago
    Q: Who comes out well in every boom and every bust?
    A: Who creates the money at no cost?

    Without unlimited ability to create no-cost credit by the central banks none of this could have occurred.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 7 months ago
    Robert, the problem with writing such a superb article is only how difficult it will be to do better.
    I have been a fan of your articles for a long time, but here you have done an amazing job of demonstrating your point. Anyone should be able to get it.
    And the title is a match!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo