Did I Read This Right?

Posted by SaltyDog 3 years, 10 months ago to History
24 comments | Share | Flag

First, Mr. Brock refers to the Hillary scandals as "garbage". But that pales to insignificance when compared with his reference to "the whole Benghazi hoax". Now that fiasco in Benghazi was (and still is!) a lot of things, but I hardy think that the word 'hoax' can be anything BUT a massive, inappropriate, ignorant statement!

Or do I owe him an apology?
SOURCE URL: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/david-brock-responds-hillary-donors-214377

Add Comment


All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by strugatsky 3 years, 10 months ago
    What he meant to say was that those sideline issues, like Benghazi, the emails, overall lying and cheating, have nothing to do with working to elect Hillary, so that she can continue the status quo of progressive millionaires continuing to feed at the government trough. They know the rules; they know that they need to pay for the entrance to the Steal from America Club and they will do that.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 3 years, 10 months ago
    Yes, Salty, you read it right. And no, you're not wrong. Just say it loud enough, say it long enough and eventually, it will become true. It worked for Goebbels It worked for Stalin, It worked for Mao, not to mention Pol Pot. Of course the "truth" must be backed up by coercion. Unfortunately for Hillary, she doesn't have the power of coercion to the degree the others have had. So far, that is. We'll have to wait until she's elected for that.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 3 years, 10 months ago
    Mr. Brock must be referring to a different incident n Benghazi that was not made public. The Benghazi attack in which Americans died was not a hoax. It happened. Either that or he should be tried in a PC court for being politically incorrect.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 3 years, 10 months ago
    this man is obviously a spin doctor, currently involved
    in trying to salvage Hillary's campaign. . he is determined
    to keep her out of jail by any means available.

    in a nation faithful to the founders' explicitly stated principles,
    we would be looking at an indictment and pending trial
    of HRC for contributing directly to the deaths of 4 u.s. citizens,
    for exposing national secrets to hackers, and for lying under oath.
    instead, she is likely to be nominated for president.

    I might not buy Brock's book, after all. -- j
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by  $  Olduglycarl 3 years, 10 months ago
    No, do not apologize...this creature is infected with the same disease that every leftist has...it's called parasitical unhumanism which is characterized by a lack of conscience, honesty or mutuality with the rest of the population.
    Like the liar that begins to believe his own lies even though he made them up himself and usually accompanied with great sums of money, the promise of favors or power.
    Of course hiltery IS complicit in these crimes even if she was just obeying balmies orders.
    Remember, right out of school she spent time with Allinsky and was fired from her first job in the watergate commission for breaking the law, not to mention being mentored by bill bob.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  


  • Comment hidden. Undo