14

US Economic Freedom Plunges

Posted by dbhalling 10 years, 1 month ago to Politics
58 comments | Share | Flag

While these indices are not perfectly accurate, I would argue that over the last several years, the US has been given too high a ranking.


All Comments

  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    First what is the government definition of small business. It's not ten thousand and sweat equity building to ten times that. Once upon a time I approached the Small Business Adminisitration but since I wasn't an 'immigrant' it was 'who you?' Small business started - back then = at $250,000 by this time it's got to be a million. To get the loan you had to prove you were turned down by a bank and the banks would never turn yuo down just put the application on hold for further study. To hell with them/ We were the first in the state to sell laser printers for under a thousand. One of the banks was a customer for computer systems. Didn't matter. Same bank followed all the federal guidelines and went out of business on mandatory toxic loans in 2008. To understand small business the first principle is avoid government as much as possible. If their regulations demand some expenditure at ten employees stop a nine. If you need more work product lease a computer system. It's cheaper and more efficient hiring warm bodies. Same lesson applied here each and every day.

    I made it a success and in the end profitable by selling the business's and taking a profit that way. and then putting it into something else to avoid payng taxes/ fines for being successful.

    And then I went sailing. The book you mentioned was the bible the rest I lesrned by reading books or working for and observing others. Which made the profit even more profitable.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Jan the most rational EPA has acted is when Carol Browning I remember bounced out in her rah rahs and did the California air head imitation. That is a level of rationale and explains why life long conservatinests never see things the way the DPA and the regulators 'see it. But then at our level we don't have billions and trillions of public funds to waste and usually have somewhat better than an out of work cheerleader in charge. I am nothing if not sarcastic but truth hurts so deal with it.'
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I make sure that my students do not go to the State Science Institute or any of its affiliate agencies.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Sorry, jbrenner. Did not mean to accidentally introduce a taint of rationality into a discussion of the EPA and other gov agencies.

    Jan, not really apologetic
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    A. Yes I got rather good at that where it counts.
    B. The genetic child is not a criminal until he's allowed or encouraged to be a criminal. In the USA both conditions are in forces so genetic knowledge is mooted. The responsibile party then becomes those who have replaced the family and the parent.

    C. Depends on who designs and administers the test and how much they are paid off to tweak the results. Under the present administration legacy building comes first. Results come last and has done so for near seven years.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    I know how to handle my samples and my students' samples, but needless to say, the EPA, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and my county's environmental regulators don't see it the way that you do.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Interesting exposition, MichaelA. I agree with Heinlein in many respects (one of the threads that lead to my joining the military was the idea that the flip side of being able to vote is being willing to defend the country). I think that you have an excellent point that there are 'adults' and 'adults by accident of birthdate'. Have you seen/read of the experiments in delayed gratification?
    http://www.ted.com/talks/joachim_de_p...

    I do not agree that behind each criminal child is a negligent adult. Some recent surveys have indicated that criminality is genetic to at least a certain degree - and a parent is not responsible for psychopathic/sociopathic behavior in a child (these seem to be substantially genetic).

    It would be intriguing to have a 'test for adulthood' like we have a 'test for IQ'. I wonder what percentage of adults would not eat the marshmallow.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    So, a student-handled vial is discovered to be without a label. You can plausibly rule out some categories of hazmat (eg you know if it could not be radioactive). Can you not just dispose of it in a maximum-safe manner?

    Why is this even reportable? (I assume that if only a few people know of the existence of the unlabeled vial, it could be disposed of like the dead garter snakes were.)

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    That is an example of the value level of students. They are by definition learning. Until then they must be checked constantly. Student demands on campus fall into the unlabeled vial model as jbrenner pointed out. They also fall into the Heinlein model of no juvenile delinquent and students are legal juveniles until age 21.

    Some get exceptions called legal emancipation. A commissioned officer in the military for example at age 19 may be considered emancipated and awarded the paper but even they may not violate local drinking and smoking laws based solely on a commission. Students are legal children and for every anti-social law breaker there is invariably a responsible adult delinquent in his or her duty. Parent or President Emeritus. those who if they do not take adult steps and make adult decisions such as not emptying out a school in the face of a bomb threat after stating they did not know if it was or wasn't.

    Those adults are legally and morally delinquent in their duty and for a start not to be trusted. Accident of birth date aside I suspect Wesleyan University and a high school in Houston and some student counselor in Roseburg, Oregon fall in that category. Obviously age is a convenient means of awarding citizenship status but an inconvenient failure as a means of making that decision.

    If those students or that student is brought before a judge and states I was only falling orders as promulgated and awarded by the government itself that individual would a. not be defended by the guilty parties neither would the legislatures, executives and judicial follies be called forth as accessories before during or after the fact. The student would not realize by saying those words he or she had admitted to guilt and pleaded for leniency in sentencing,

    So would the teacher or professor who did not check all the labels if they used that for an excuse. Adult educators do. Those who are legal adults de jure but not adults de facto do not. Nor do they check the supplies of damping rods in the Ukraine.

    Real life is not equipped with a pause, stop, restart nor a replay button. Knowing the difference is an adult trait called responsibility.

    Something sadly lacking but as just demonstrated not entirely in educational and judicial circles.

    Had the student in JBrenners class been warned, seen a list of rules posted and flipped them off intentionally fine them an expel them until they learn to accept the level of maturity required to be a student in a chemistry class..

    I cannot think of an accident that would remove the tape and remove the label just as i cannot think of a weapon being accidentally loaded. Accident therefore is an excuse a Nuremberg defense. It calls for the strictest of measures until certainty is reestablished. My imagination comes up with a vial on a table with an open wind a sudden gust of wind the vial hits the floor and..hmmmm breaks. The the tape is dissolved the wording lost.

    Noticing a potential accident waiting to happen the same. the student should have noticed and reported it no matters who was at fault but the responsible adult MUST do so. That's why good drill sergeants, gunnys, and the like seem to be everywhere all the time and miss nothing.

    That's why the best of politicians routinely miss everything. There is no requirement to be an adult de facto other than accident of birth to be a Senator of Representative. There are no requirements to be a judge at the highest level other than nomination and confirmation yet they are confirmed by the most incompetent level available..

    Thank you for pointing that out. Heinlein was right. We treat our dogs better than our children.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    An example would involve a case where a student labeled a vial, but without tape around the label. The label then falls off. Now it is an unknown chemical, and must be assumed to be the worst level.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Back in the old days before my former home state was californicated no one went hungry and the law turned a blind eye or helped deliver the provender.

    Now it's in the day I guess everyone hits the reset button and play pretends and may I recommend my Grandfathers remedy used prior to 1900 in Idaho. Gallon of tar and a two sacks of feathers. That was for the new federal game wardens and park rangers confiscating his dogs winter food. They sold it to the butcher store (new guy in the west) and he waited until after sunday after church dinner. Then let the story out the feds had taken his horse meat. THAT is a true western story from the old days. I don't know if tar and feathers were really used but they did run the two rascals out of the County. (Ashton,Idaho.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    That would be hard even for the proposed mini series. But it does draw more interest and drives key points home so each step serves it's purpose.

    A Dark Side version would be Too Big Too Fail where the true architects of the 2008 crash were cast as the hero and heroins and the dude trying to 'save the day' was kissing Pelosillynnis ass. When a question comes up you can pull out the objectivists in flight card. Or if someone is bitching about prices ask why they voted for it. In an airport when the TSA bitching starts ask the same question. WHY did you vote for it not once but three times and getting ready to do it a fourth time. Chances are they are 'Democrat - ID's. Republican the water boys and lapdogs or those that dropped out in one form or another. Have a line ready for each of them.

    If they are a Biden supporter just start laughing.

    The difficult task would be finding people who could not only read but read at that level and defeat the idea of seeing the movie means you don't need to read the book.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Can you give an example of what you mean? I recall a story of a man who was hired to go to a hotel construction site a break of day - before anyone else got there - and police the site to pick up any dead animals lest one of them be reported to the EPA (garter snakes were a special problem, apparently).

    I do not have a comparable image in my mind of what sort of an accidental student violation could result in such a fine.

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    An excellent book. Not my favorite of Heinlein's but definitely on of the good ones. (Wm's favorite, I think.)

    Jan
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    And enact Davis-Bacon II so they could get three times the local prevailing wage for the hard work they did in engineering the crash of 2008

    Has Boehner done a Specter yet?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    And in Nevada, there is a hunting season on sage grouse, believe it or not. They are not endangered. I wonder what will happen to the bird's population numbers, when millions of out of work people are getting hungry?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 10 years, 1 month ago
    If we could get more people to read "Atlas Shrugged", and other books by Ayn Rand, it might
    turn the country around. Too bad the movie
    wasn't better. It came nowhere near doing justice
    to the book. I am not a financial expert; I under-
    stand business in general terms, basic princip-
    les, enough to understand small business.

    But maybe I can learn more about it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Until all the thinkers, innovators and doers are Morlocks. Only way to get rid of it is let it, encourage it to kill itself preferably by suicide and then rename Washington DC Jonestown..
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    How about enacting a "Sarbanes-Oxley for Congress"? It would hold every legislator that stands up on the floor of Congress and says things like "Fannie Mae is perfectly sound!" financially responsible for the results, just as if he were a CEO in the private sector.

    Of course it would take constitutional change to enact it.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 10 years, 1 month ago
    The strange realization I have come to recently is that our own government through the mechanisms outlined in this article - is shutting down the motor of the world.

    I posted it awhile back, but the decision of "non-listing" the Greater Sage Grouse has just recently been finalized with an official Record Of Decision. As many are beginning to catch on to, the DOI's resource management plans that have been announced instead are worse than if the bird had been listed.

    The gold exploration project I have worked on for the last year and a half has been taken by an arbitrary hard rock minerals withdrawal. The project was in an historic gold producing district, high grade veins, with about 400,000 ounces of gold, ten times that of silver having been produced (oh my gosh, that word). And they are withdrawing it from mineral entry. Unbelievable.

    Besides killing jobs and a year and half of my training and skills as a geologist being taken, consider this. In this era of worthless paper money, we can't even explore for and potentially mine real money.

    The project was in a remote canyon, about as remote as you can get in the lower 48, and it is no Galt's Gulch. Galt's Gulch will probably be sage grouse habitat, it is so ubiquitous. Apparently my future gulch will be the park bench.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    No. i never make what i have no knowledge of. I could copy them but would never do that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 10 years, 1 month ago in reply to this comment.
    Good for you - or understood. The guiding question is what is likely to make you happiest over the next 20-30 years of your life?
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo