International Criminal Court asked to investigate ISIS

Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 9 months ago to The Gulch: General
64 comments | Share | Flag

genocide, ethnic cleansing, whatever name = evil. . what hope might this offer? -- j


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Freedom isn't in their lexicon starting with the meaning of the name Islam or Muslim. Submissioin and one who submits. It is a religion for slaves.Top to bottom. They want the clock turned back and a nuclear wall to protect them against time. No sense pulling punches. The only breakaways are slaughtered where they are found. Be it in the mountains of Kurdistan or the streets of Haifa. Treating with an enemy who has flat out stated their desire to convert or kill you is the act of a madman or a traitor. They have much in common with secular progressives who wish the same thing -minus a Godhead. Thus we bring the conversation on track - properly framed. We are not slaves no matter our other differences, Yoda of Berkeley is not a Secular God but a deranged shill for a neo Stalinest scam artist. Two enemies with the same goals. Which both have stated openly. Muslims have ISIS we have ACLU.Enemies foreign and enemies domestic.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    one of our favorite elements in the classification business
    was manurium, the universal nutrient for all life forms! -- j

    p.s. second in value only to imaginarium, the platinum of the gods.
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This even worse that we thought. Call the world court! Investigations to start immediately. Belching BELCHING not only noxious effluent but bad table manners! Remember the chickens with the signs? Chickens produce a huge amount of methane. We've been looking in the wrong direction. Camels! You are free to go. Chickens and Cows line up over here. Bend over.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    cow belches (they don't usually fart) contain methane,
    which can be collected and used to heat the farmer's
    home (saw a good example on Dirty Jobs last week). -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Thank you both, Michael and Allo...

    Some months ago, my step-grandson and I pursued the 'logic' of a question/problem he described, using the Critical Thinking / Socratic Method to seek The Root Cause of the Problem he brought to the (lunch) table.

    I've claimed that 'normally,' if you drill down at least five or six layers of "Well, Why Is THAT?" into an issue, you can approach Root Cause, from which real cures and solutions Might Be formulated.

    With the issue he brought up (I don't remember what the Issue was, but that's not the issue here.. ) we drilled down for at least 45 minutes, and by his count (I lost track at around 8-10 levels 'down,' we were at least 12-15 layers into the onion and hadn't come close to Root Cause.

    Yep, as so many writers are adding to TV scripts today, "it's complicated."

    No shit! My gripe has been, for at least five or more years, that the MSM never goes more than one layer deep before claiming Root Cause and what they call Root Cause is NEVER the True Root Cause in any actionable way that might lead to a change in behavior or results regarding the Original Problem.

    The butterfly-cow-bull-whatever list I started and you expanded is a Very Good Example of why 'it's complicated.'

    And why I just LOVE 'asking questions' on various fora.

    Thanks!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Now now make haste slowly. One assumes the fault is the cow's but what if the bull caused the effluvium mechanically. Do we blame the bull? Islam would blame the cow. Which is why they don't have them. Who ever heard of camels causing such an astronomic problem?

    Or is it the fault of the farmer not providing proper sustenance? Remember it's a Green question. Greens traditionally are leftists. Leftists are in power therefore are now conservative or at least conservatively liberal in their nature and protective of their newly won turf. Land mines, barb wire, all sorts of stuff it's enough to make cow flop. Which brings us back to sustenance so maybe...maybe....it's a turf war between cows and camels but it will take further study and by the way an increase in grant funding.

    That really smells! It's the damn eco scientists all the time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    A cow fart alone could start a chain action of air movement that grows, grows and grows into another Hurricane Katrina.
    So chickens with signs should say: "Eet mo kow."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Or, "one man's atrocities are another man's Service To Allah..."

    And that's about all the positive effect I would expect from the 'lawsuit' as described...

    How many ways can we say "zero"?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Got it! If a butterfly smells a cow fart and flaps its wings differently as a result, massive climatic effects can be blamed on cows!

    Brilliant....
    oh, wait...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Before a bug becomes a butterfly, it is a caterpillar eating crop leaves.
    As for the Butterfly Theory (maybe linked to the Chaos Theory), some presume that a butterfly flapping its wings in Tokyo could cause a tornado in Nebraska. Or vice versa.
    Whoa wait a minute, ding! ding! ding!
    Old Dino just came up with--ta da--The Cow Fart Theory!
    If a cow--well, you can figure the rest out.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Cows are on their s--t list for bovine effluence destroying the ozone layer. I'm not sure what crimes butterflies have committed unless it's flys in the butter.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years, 9 months ago
    What's to investigate?
    They have, and admittedly, committed unspeakable crimes against humanity. Just go to youtube, they filmed their activity's.

    I think this is just a circus side show.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I called that out, when I had been there 15 years, and
    retired after 18 more -- three more job titles -- so the story
    continued. . I still know several of them, and we are friends
    to an extent. . oh, the tales which could be told....... -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Maybe the 'shoot the boss" only works if you instructed to do something really bad, like kill someone else in cold blood. Shooting the boss is a last ditch effort in a life or death situation. In the case of your issue, you were a whistleblower, and companies dont like whistleblowers. I suppose finding another job is the only fix to that problem.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ISIS needs to be shown what's what.
    So do cows and butterflies.
    The International Criminal Court is here to make a difference.
    We do that by taking up space.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I tried your "shoot the boss" suggestion in an industrial
    environment. . my boss dealt with competition like BHO does --
    he undermined them and ran them out of the competition.
    I exposed his technique after I discovered it, and
    we were both run off from the organization. . I was
    moved out laterally and he was compelled to retire. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 9 months ago in reply to this comment.
    For some reason I reject the "only following orders" defense. I think if you pull the trigger because someone "told you to", you are guilty also. I tend to think that the so called leader isnt as responsible as people think just because he "told them to do it". But thats just my thoughts on it and what I would do if left to my own devices in dealing out justice.

    It does get a bit more complicated if the person who is told to shoot has a gun to HIS head from his "boss". Maybe the thing to do is shoot the boss if you can instead of the victim.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 9 months ago
    Just one of dozens, perhaps hundreds, of atrocities should be enough to condemn the entire movement.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo