Carly Fiorina's suports Common Core, believes in anthropomorphic climate change, and supports immigration amnesty.

Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 8 months ago to Politics
116 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Carly Fiorina on Immigration: Pass the DREAM Act. For other undocumented immigrants, a direct path to citizenship is unfair. While running for the U.S. Senate in California in 2010, Fiorina said she supports the DREAM Act, which would give legal status to people who were brought to the U.S. illegally as children.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/carly-fio...

Carly Fiorina on Climate change: It is real and manmade. But government has limited ability to address it. Speaking in New Hampshire in February, Fiorina said there is scientific consensus that climate change is real and caused by humans.
http://www.c-span.org/video/?324350-1...

Carly Fiorina on Education: Supports Common Core – Set national standards but give local districts maximum control. No Child Left Behind was positive. In a position paper while running for the U.S. Senate in California, Fiorina
http://www.carlyforca.com/downloads/C...

All Comments

  • Posted by Flootus5 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I have said for quite a while now, that the Democrats have become communists, and the Republicans have become Democrats.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I couldn't find any except the Kennedy situation. And the last one or was it to when the anti-semitics came out and of course the one's where the anti christians came out but those turned out to be more economics than but come to think of it it's been used a lot as the excuse but not as the reason. Elections like wars are about economics and violence or the threat there of is always the answer unless trumped by economics.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Now now now let us not label in haste they are also deep in the socialist corporatist mode as well. socialist corporatist statists mix rather well with the official Washington beeiyooteefool pipples. Let not one remained untarnished to the fullest extent deserved.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't see it that way . I don't see a between this and that I see a very secular socialist party running a stage play with actors assignend roles as being fore or against, one side or another and an electorage that sort of bubbas along applauding on queue in Clintonesque lock step. If it's theocracy it's a secular version. So I'm not at at all concerned as the final candidate(s) have already been chosen. That's there system. Not mine. Nor do I have to buy into it or show any allegience to it. i'm more inclined to honor a forum held write here with the ACLU Soristas weeded out and run with x number of parties y number of coalitions and once elected proclaim them the shadow government. As long as it was run by the Constitution. Those other people back by Europe somewhere on the Putt o matic River have nothing to do with me or my country.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Haha... Yeah, what's the question. The GOP is pure statist. I personally know GOP guys who are offended by that statement, but will turn around in their very next sentence and prove me right. Unfrigginbelievable.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    There will be other alternatives, so if she is the GOP chosen one, there is no reason to vote for her. Cottonmouth vs Rattler vs Liberty.
    Choose liberty.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    He would not make a good sleeper agent with that face. Red Herring comes to mind. He personifies RINO = left wing socialist statist = Democrat Tool.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Republican Party as it was imagined by its founders never really existed. Just as Capitalism as put forth by Rand never existed (the UNKNOWN Ideal). It has ever been the lesser of two or more evils. Refraining from participation is like the driver of a car turning the steering over to a guy in the back seat. So far, the grandiose promise of a "free" country as proposed by the founders has deteriorated, bit by bit, inch by inch as more and more of the leftists, and the moochers, and the mooching leftists moved in and the men of integrity melted away. Now, a spark has been ignited. Whether through an upsurge in conservatism, or the influence of talk shows on the radio, I'm not sure. So far it has been a candle flame in the wind, but it is starting to ignite some significant numbers. Perhaps this bodes well, but it has a very long way to go before it marches down the path toward the true freedom of Capitalism and all that it stands for.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by LibertyBelle 10 years, 8 months ago
    Well, if those things are true, it makes her not near-
    ly so good as I had hoped. But Cruz may be ad-
    ceptable to vote for this time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 10 years, 8 months ago
    She was also a terrible CEO, tanking not just one, but two major companies. Remember, she tanked Lucent before she got to the helm of HP.

    Want to know why she lost so badly to Barbara Boxer in that Senate race in CA? Because all Boxer had to do was run a single issue ad exposing how terrible Fiorina was for business to completely undercut any potential cache she had. Boxer won in a landslide.

    Fiorina has the gift of being quick on her feet mentally, but her credentials are merely high-profile failures for which she got paid a lot of money. I'd vote for her only if it the alternative were Hillary Clinton.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's funny, hadn't thought of that; oleuglycarly...hahahahahahahahah

    What I was saying is that practically no one vets these things out and I was trying to give the benefit of the doubt. Maybe not in this case but one should ask these questions directly and then make an assessments on the response.
    Then, vet it out like crazy. As for the audience in carlyfornia, I think it's obvious the lack of gray matter in that state.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dadyer 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ...alcohol addiction is still a serious social problem.
    I suppose it depends on how you define "serious".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 8 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ah yes there is that fly in the ointment. I wasn't however being courteous. Just polite. I could have said go suck an egg. I could have said Eat S--t and bark at the moon. But I'm guilty of being more civilized - to some extent. So SUE ME! You get one thumb for that!
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo