10

Herd Extinct, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 9 years, 7 months ago to Economics
19 comments | Share | Flag

The crowd never thinks. People are only comfortable in a pack, and they’re most comfortable in one that’s racing off a cliff.

The Golden Pinnacle

Herd animals herd because there is safety in numbers. Even if the wolves or lions attack, they’re only going to get a small percentage of the herd. Such attacks even have an evolutionary advantage: they eliminate sick or weak members. Those who think humans are not herd animals labor under such vast misconceptions that they are beyond the reach of SLL.

One herd, Wall Street-Washington economists, surpass wildebeests and sheep. Their behavior, because it is so uniform, can easily be described. Membership in one of two subspecies is required: Keynesians or monetarists. Both have long histories of predictions that didn’t predict and policy remedies that didn’t remedy, but they all believe because they all believe. Intellectual foundations this shaky increase individual and group insecurity, so they base their work on the same set of statistics emanating from the government. The government’s assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions are never questioned, except by outcasts from the herd. After all, those assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions come from the herd itself.


All Comments

  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years, 7 months ago
    Your speaking of bicameral; (pre conscious) humanoids that are devoid of conscience, a mind and have given up the ability or gift of choice.
    In Shakespearean terms...faced with the question...they have chosen "not to be".
    They self evidently do not represent 'Conscious' humanity.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JCLanier 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Allosaur: Your original comment I found intriguing and actually correct... It made me think and I just wanted to work it through for myself so to speak. Thank you.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I may have missed the point for thinking of a tribe that uses fully functional intelligent reasoning rather than a follow-the-leader moo-moo herd or, perhaps for a better example, a baa-baa flock.
    A mob is a pack of fools who can thoughtlessly trash their own town because their sports team won a championship.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by JCLanier 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    allosaur: Yes, they did. I would most likely not have arrived at that correlation, but you have a point.
    While arriving to your point, if we are free thinking individuals that base our decisions on reason (A=A) and we live by value-for-value then, in that coming together, we celebrate these powerful truths as a common denominator and we remain within our free will as individuals making a choice and accepting our responsibility for our choices. Our coming together is to revel in our different talents and the fair trade of these talents where nothing is free -it is earned.

    The opposite of this is the anonymous uniting of numbers who delegate their reasoning to the mob without any control over the outcome. No personal power, no personal responsibility since all is relinquished to the herd/mob. And the end game is almost always -something free.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by BradA 9 years, 7 months ago
    The herd mentality is even more prevalent among today's so called "scientists" who worship at the alter of man-caused global warming. Not only do they willfully ignore everything but CO2 from their consideration but their herd has recently called for the jailing of other herds that might consider making such a consideration.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 7 months ago
    We "herd" on the freeways when we are desirous of evading police efforts at random taxation. Much harder to stop a herd that is speeding than one lone wolf zipping past everyong in the fast lane. Send in your tax returns on april 15th
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 7 months ago
    Which is why, economist protestations aside, Economics as practiced is not and never could be, called a science.
    "Line up 25 economists and they'd all point in different directions."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ayn Rand's fictional "thinking people" DID gravitate to the Gulch to obtain a perhaps primitive sense of tribal unity as well as self-defense from a warped world order
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 7 months ago
    Until the truth of a .300 Weatherby or lion or cougar intervenes. The outcasts form their own herd. Survival motive is strong in both thinking people and instinctive animals. Nature is balanced alls right with the world.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Obiwan could teach her well, but she despises Star Wars. I fear she may turn to the Dark Side of the force.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    My daughter probably could be convinced to be an Objectivist. She has many of the values, but has refused to read AS. She disliked Anthem. It was too sad for her. Ironically she was forced to read Anthem, for her high school (not forced by me).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Very nice, Robert. I remember that chapter well. For the record, my younger daughter is definitely not an O.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 7 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think she should read that Golden Pinnacle book. The author is kind of out there, but it's a pretty good book, and it does have a chapter, Fool's Gold, on the Fed. Don't lend her your cherished copy, make her get her own, paperback or Kindle, available on Amazon. :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 7 months ago
    My younger daughter approached me yesterday about an end-of-semester writing assignment for her economics class. She is expected to do a review on a book acceptable to her professor. I recommended "The Source of Economic Growth", "The Golden Pinnacle", and "The Creature of Jekyll Island". My daughter told me that her paper would get special treatment if it focused on the Federal Reserve. Neither of us is sure what "special treatment" consists of.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo