

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
You can't come up with other choices than the Same Old Tired Socialist Roaders offered by the Government Party?
I like the idea, he is saying "if you vote for me, this is what my team will look like". Donald Trump wouldn't be out chasing criminals. Seeing who would is an interesting aspect.
In our bids, it is obviously "proposed" because if the agency takes 6 months to award the contract, we're not leaving $100k to $250k people sitting on the bench hoping for a maybe/if. If we reallocate them, we document the changes upon award, but try to keep as much of the proposed team as possible.
Similarly, Trump indicated he was bringing Carl Icahn for economic liaison to China/Japan... which is brilliant as well... I don't think Obama can spell "Currency Manipulation", let alone understand it, or any of his 'advisors'. We had the same problem with Clinton... Remember Joselyn Elders as surgeon general with "Clapner" and teaching kids to masturbate in grade school?
I loved how Hillary will 'get tough' with Iran and 'use military action if necessary'... Just like Clinton did with the USS Cole (nothing), and how he turned down Bin Laden's head when the Saudi's offered him up. Then sent Tomahawks in to blow up empty/deserted campsites.
If Trump can illustrate out what the cabinet 'Dream Team' would look like, it's a compelling approach. Would you rather look at something like that and think? "Yeah, these guys can do that." Or guess out of thin air which 'major donors' or 'money aggregators' are going to get those jobs under a Bush or Clinton presidency.
He's a Republican and therefore a member of the Government Party Coalition and there fore left wing.
He's a corporatist socialist
I have a rule on note voting for anyone who fits that description.
Three Strikes Your Out
I've been thinking Ron Paul would be a good choice for Secretary of the Treasury.
Other ideas for a dream team cabinet, guaranteed to cause cranial hemorrhaging in liberals?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2...
Load more comments...