- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/00f5c3ggowirg5...
I'd put these on everything. And hopefully they would get people curious and to the website, where they could watch a trailer. I find people are a lot more receptive to discussing Atlas Shrugged when they make it part of the way on their own.
**I obviously made up the release date. June seemed good since that's the month Dagny spent in the Gulch.
I'd certainly make a lot of noise to get people to see an Atlas Shrugged marathon.
Hey, Harmon! Hey John! If this move is "for you" — meaning, for those who have already read the novel and will no doubt purchase the DVD regardless of how bad the movie is — then why bother releasing the movie theatrically? Just go direct-to-DVD. You sound as if you're already convinced (perhaps with good reason) that part III will also be a box-office failure. (Just a guess, but I wonder if it has something to do with the weak screenwriting and directing? Nah, couldn't be that. It must be the "irrationality" of the movie-going public.)
Additionally, I've read some online film-finance sources that indicate the previous DVD sales of parts I and II were actually quite weak.
I'm sure the failure, critical and commercial, of the AS trilogy will not hurt future sales of the novel (though it might possibly hurt future attempts by more competent producers to film or televise it), but it behooves us *cineastes* to ask the following:
On John's blog, prior to the November 2012 election, Aglialoro asserted in an interview that if Obama won a second term, there would be no point in producing the final part of the trilogy. Alas, Obama did win a second term. So why is he proceeding with the project?
Just curious. I expect him to duck the question entirely.