11

Donald vs Hillary - Disgusting or Hillarious

Posted by freedomforall 9 years, 10 months ago to Politics
102 comments | Share | Flag

"On one side we have a rich, fat, old, white, blonde-haired, blue-eyed, candidate with an unpleasant voice, an arrogant manner, and an authoritarian personality. On the other side we have Donald Trump. Apart from sex, they’re like two megalomaniacal peas in a pod.What is a voter to do? Imagine a ballot with Benito Mussolini and Eva Perón. Choose one. Go ahead. "


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I got the starbucks thread started. it's much the same as you just said with fifty seven different flavors.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 9 years, 10 months ago
    It's an avoidance, avoidance conflict!
    Damned if you do and Damned if you don't.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 10 months ago
    it's a choice between a loose cannon and a cannon pointed
    at my gut -- I pick the loose cannon, and will learn to dance. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 10 months ago
    I'd vote for Eva. At least she'd have a great theme song in "Don't Cry For Me, Argentina."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That sounds good to me! Might cause some candidates to change names though. Malcom X, would be a winner.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, I would take anyone chosen at random over HIllary. As to Trump being an unknown, he isn't the same as Obama. Obama tried to fly under the radar and never actually did anything. Trump has done lots of things, good and bad. He has a clear record.

    Not as a politician, but if you can build buildings in New York City, you understand politics.

    That being said, I'm not sure who I'm voting for in the Republican Party. I like Rand Paul a lot, but he doesn't seem like he's a serious contender. I don't want Bush -- Republicans like him keep the water boiling under the pot we frogs are in.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by dukem 9 years, 10 months ago
    My own view is that we actually know who Hillary is, at least most of the people on this list do. Howewer, Trump and Obama are the ultimate Rorschach Test, in that people project their own "stuff" (fantasies, hopes, dreams, fears) onto those candidates. Their persona is different, but the people will have their dreams fulfilled, one way or another, even if in a fantasy.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Agreed, but...

    Then we should be campaigning mightily for killing the two party system in the general election. There is nothing in the constitution about it, and one could bring a case that the ballot having D and R options to click and a write-in only for another candidate is unconstitutional. Make everyone write in their vote of select without instrumentational bias from the field of options.

    ...otherwise, I go back to "we are throwing away our votes." Go ahead. I'm not doing this, unless there is a landslide for Hillary. Anybody is better for our country than Hillary.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Anyone who continues to vote for the GOP after being repeatedly betrayed is giving consent to exactly the socialist nightmare that exists today.
    Stop pretending you are doing something to slow growth of government and look at the results of the past 30 years. Voting for the lesser of two evils is a perfect example of Einstein's definition of insanity: repeating the same action and expecting a different result.
    Conservative voters have been doing the same thing for 30 years and what has been the result? It's time to wake up and desert the lying, looting GOP because they have failed to do ANYTHING they have promised and instead have continually done the oppopsite, leading to bigger government, more socialism, less liberty, and a pathetic managed economy with no chance of improvement.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The only reason independents have 'no chance' is that people would rather vote for a supposed lesser evil instead of FOR someone who will defend liberty.
    YES, vote for someone who is for liberty and against the state. Stop wasting your vote.
    GOP voters are like Jews in Nazi Germany, pretending the enemy who only kills half your family is an answer, when it's nothing but consenting to murder. There will be no improvement until conservatives leave the GOP and have the courage to vote for someone who has ethics and integrity to promote liberty instead of just someone "better than Hillary."
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    What are you recommending? "Signing a petition" for an independent that has no chance?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Certainly in the primaries, but in the general if Trump is the R and Hillary is the D, anything other vote is simply signing a petition.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    But is anyone as bad as Hitlery?
    Stop throwing away your vote for Republicans. They have betrayed you for 155 years and that is not going to change.
    Voting GOP because they are arguably better than Democrats is the main reason that there is always more government and less liberty.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Nixon was an amateur with a conscience. No comparison to 21st century looters. You think Hillary would resign in disgrace? No chance.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo