Kristoffer Polaha is John Galt: Atlas Shrugged III wraps production
Posted by overmanwarrior 11 years, 4 months ago to Movies
As I watched the proceedings on the last day of shooting during Valentines Day, I realized I was watching history in the making. It will sort of simmer for a decade or two like many of the progressive policies did on the backs of several occult mystics and superstitious knuckleheads from the past. Atlas Shrugged Part III is an achievement, like climbing a tall mountain that nobody thought possible and those who hoped nobody ever would used superstition to keep anybody from even trying. John Aglialoro and a small army of dedicated supporters did, and the result will appear in around 500 theaters this upcoming fall of 2014. And the world will be a lot better off because of it—which makes me immensely proud.
John Galt will be a gift to film history.
John Galt will be a gift to film history.
Previous comments... You are currently on page 3.
You really don't know me, and it makes you look rather foolish to act as if you do.
I am by no means a follower of Ayn Rand or any of her extremist philosophies. I am an atheist, though. I am also NOT asking you to change your beliefs, I am merely pointing out Ayn Rand's beliefs, and the beliefs now commonly held by her acolytes.
And there is a HUGE difference between believing that I will wake up the next morning, or that the sun will again rise, and that there is a giant, invisible, telepathic, telekinetic Sky Daddy that loves us so god-damned much that he will set fire to us forever if we fail to love him back in just the right (though still poorly defined) way. But you may continue to believe in Him if you so chose. I really could not care less. Well...unless you try to pass laws controlling ME, based on YOUR fantasy. And at least when it comes to THAT, I DO follow Ayn Rand.
Do you not expect to wake up in the morning? Do you not anticipate your next heartbeat? Congratulations, you are a person of faith.
Run around the room, waving your hands in the air and proclaim "there is no god". In the end you will be exhausted and you and I will be one moment closer to our grave and God will still be.
I don't ask you to believe, why do you demand that I surrender my belief? A is not A with that.
"Generosity is inborn; altruism is a learned perversity" - Robert A. Heinlein
Protestant Christian churches, unlike socialists, do not compel contributions or participation. The Catholic church is slightly different, but to be quite frank, I have trouble picturing Catholics as being particularly devout... "deeply religious".
From whence did the universe come, after all... both?
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?p...
"This talk argues that only Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, provides a code of morality suitable for living successfully and happily on earth. Objectivism holds that reality is real, that reason is man's only means of knowing it and that one should act in one's own rational self-interest, with rationality being the highest virtue. Life is the objective standard of morality. In contrast, Christianity asserts that reality is governed by supernatural forces, that knowledge is based on faith and that the highest moral virtue is self-sacrifice. It will be shown that Christianity cannot be practiced consistently, destroys the integriity of man's mind, and is incompatible with living successfully and happily in the real world." (from Dr. Edwin Locke, through the Ayn rand Institute)
Read into it what you will (while you quote Corinthians)
* I'm going to go out on a limb and assume "deeply religious," otherwise why would they have bothered to bring it up at all?
That's because most Objectivists treat it like a religion (in that they haven't read the books, and don't think about the deeper implications of it all that much)
I'm not disagreeing with you, but if "any person can be cast to play an objectivist" (and you're right), then why in the world should we care if Polaha is "a person of value, loves his wife and children...and is a man of religion"?
For him to be "the perfect John Galt," all he has to be able to do is look pretty, talk nicely, and emote deeply. And...done!
And for that matter, why would we EVER care about the personal lives, and possible "hypocrisy" of any particular actor playing any particular role?
On a side note, the most outspoken atheists I've come across are extreme leftists, and openly hostile to Objectivists and libertarians.
While, obviously, many of us, who favor the teachings of Ayn Rand and are stubborn about our opposition to religious views, we are also reasoned enough to understand --wide appeal is the best way to go. Besides, it’s a movie; any actor can be cast to play an objectivist.
Polaha is good-looking fellow, but I’m going to wait for the movie to come out before I past judgement on the choice.
Remind me to google the word "sycophant". It's possible the word's meaning has changed in recent decades...