Kristoffer Polaha is John Galt: Atlas Shrugged III wraps production

Posted by overmanwarrior 11 years, 4 months ago to Movies
76 comments | Share | Flag

As I watched the proceedings on the last day of shooting during Valentines Day, I realized I was watching history in the making. It will sort of simmer for a decade or two like many of the progressive policies did on the backs of several occult mystics and superstitious knuckleheads from the past. Atlas Shrugged Part III is an achievement, like climbing a tall mountain that nobody thought possible and those who hoped nobody ever would used superstition to keep anybody from even trying. John Aglialoro and a small army of dedicated supporters did, and the result will appear in around 500 theaters this upcoming fall of 2014. And the world will be a lot better off because of it—which makes me immensely proud.

John Galt will be a gift to film history.


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 3.
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Stargeezer,

    You really don't know me, and it makes you look rather foolish to act as if you do.

    I am by no means a follower of Ayn Rand or any of her extremist philosophies. I am an atheist, though. I am also NOT asking you to change your beliefs, I am merely pointing out Ayn Rand's beliefs, and the beliefs now commonly held by her acolytes.

    And there is a HUGE difference between believing that I will wake up the next morning, or that the sun will again rise, and that there is a giant, invisible, telepathic, telekinetic Sky Daddy that loves us so god-damned much that he will set fire to us forever if we fail to love him back in just the right (though still poorly defined) way. But you may continue to believe in Him if you so chose. I really could not care less. Well...unless you try to pass laws controlling ME, based on YOUR fantasy. And at least when it comes to THAT, I DO follow Ayn Rand.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    True, true, he COULD be a member of one of those churches that believes "All I have to do is profess my faith in Jesus to be forever saved" and that good works are nonsense. That would be right along with the objectivist faith. Sorry: belief system.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ stargeezer 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Down check me as much as you desire, it does not matter or affect my faith. But, I suppose it may increase yours since you seem to have elevated AR to godhood, and I threaten to pull the cape off of superwoman by my faith.

    Do you not expect to wake up in the morning? Do you not anticipate your next heartbeat? Congratulations, you are a person of faith.

    Run around the room, waving your hands in the air and proclaim "there is no god". In the end you will be exhausted and you and I will be one moment closer to our grave and God will still be.

    I don't ask you to believe, why do you demand that I surrender my belief? A is not A with that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not if he's a deeply religious Wiccan...

    "Generosity is inborn; altruism is a learned perversity" - Robert A. Heinlein

    Protestant Christian churches, unlike socialists, do not compel contributions or participation. The Catholic church is slightly different, but to be quite frank, I have trouble picturing Catholics as being particularly devout... "deeply religious".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Again, define the term "supernatural". If you mean "outside the universe" then.. well, duh. Reality is obviously governed by extra-universal forces.
    From whence did the universe come, after all... both?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/religi...

    http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?p...

    "This talk argues that only Objectivism, the philosophy of Ayn Rand, provides a code of morality suitable for living successfully and happily on earth. Objectivism holds that reality is real, that reason is man's only means of knowing it and that one should act in one's own rational self-interest, with rationality being the highest virtue. Life is the objective standard of morality. In contrast, Christianity asserts that reality is governed by supernatural forces, that knowledge is based on faith and that the highest moral virtue is self-sacrifice. It will be shown that Christianity cannot be practiced consistently, destroys the integriity of man's mind, and is incompatible with living successfully and happily in the real world." (from Dr. Edwin Locke, through the Ayn rand Institute)

    Read into it what you will (while you quote Corinthians)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ stargeezer 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And not every person who holds objectivist views is a atheist. As much as they like to tout that point it's not supported except by themselves. "they, considering themselves among themselves discovered that they were not wise".
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So, if Polaha is a "deeply religious man*," is it safe to assume that he will give some of his money to his CHURCH, thereby promoting their SOCAILISTIC causes (actually, it would be "Social welfare," but what's a few definitional differences between friends?)

    * I'm going to go out on a limb and assume "deeply religious," otherwise why would they have bothered to bring it up at all?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I don't like contributing money to actors who oppose my agenda or with agendas of their own. See, they get money for acting, then they spend that money on advancing socialism....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • -1
    Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It looks like they care about the stance of the actors as long as those stances match their OWN stances, regardless of what Ayn Rand's stances were! (and those last two are obviously NOT the same)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    All you have to do is read the comments around here from the movie threads for the last year to realize for whatever reason Atlas Shrugged fans care a great deal about the stance of the actors. But in the real world -- acting is getting paid to pretend.

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Rex,

    That's because most Objectivists treat it like a religion (in that they haven't read the books, and don't think about the deeper implications of it all that much)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Boothby171 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Mimi,

    I'm not disagreeing with you, but if "any person can be cast to play an objectivist" (and you're right), then why in the world should we care if Polaha is "a person of value, loves his wife and children...and is a man of religion"?

    For him to be "the perfect John Galt," all he has to be able to do is look pretty, talk nicely, and emote deeply. And...done!

    And for that matter, why would we EVER care about the personal lives, and possible "hypocrisy" of any particular actor playing any particular role?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rex_Little 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Nonsense. First, an actor's ability to portray a character doesn't depend on his personal beliefs lining up with the character's. Second, while atheism was an important part of Rand's philosophy, Atlas Shrugged pretty much ignores religion.

    On a side note, the most outspoken atheists I've come across are extreme leftists, and openly hostile to Objectivists and libertarians.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Mimi 11 years, 4 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, look at this way--The challenge was to find someone who had wide-appeal and fit the model. The producer weren’t looking for someone to please Ayn Rand, they were looking for someone to please the audience, and the audience for the movies thus far has been mixed. I remember the first time I read a thread here about the upcoming movie and this poster expressed fear that the Galt speech would be a lot like it is in the book --a smack down on religion. The poster pleaded for the producers not to be as harsh with christians when they developed the script. I’m not saying anyone should give up their principles to please anybody us, but--

    While, obviously, many of us, who favor the teachings of Ayn Rand and are stubborn about our opposition to religious views, we are also reasoned enough to understand --wide appeal is the best way to go. Besides, it’s a movie; any actor can be cast to play an objectivist.

    Polaha is good-looking fellow, but I’m going to wait for the movie to come out before I past judgement on the choice.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by terrycan 11 years, 4 months ago
    A book as complex as "Atlas Shrugged" is very difficult to make into a movie. Kaslow and Agliaro stayed true to the book. They did this at their own expense. The trilogy of movies will be a classic.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ dhinet 11 years, 4 months ago
    Yes, thanks to the work of John & Joan Aglialoro maybe the world will feel the movement. I hope that Atlas Shrugged III - Who is John Galt? is more than a good movie, hope it is the match that starts the fire of real hope and change, for better.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 11 years, 4 months ago
    Kristoffer Polaha is not D.B. Sweeney.

    Remind me to google the word "sycophant". It's possible the word's meaning has changed in recent decades...
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo