Obama will bring depression and failure. Romney will bring the best recovery this country has ever know. Billions, if not Trillions of dollars will flow into our markets, if Romney wins.

If you want welfare, vote for Obama.
If you want good jobs, vote for Romney.

This is my position as well. We must get senators and representatives that are willing to push back when needed, remove lots of legislation, regulation and restore the balance between the legislative and executive branches. Without a congress that will do this the president cannot address the issues, but we do need a president that will lead in this direction as well.

I believe that Romney, at best, will be the eye of the storm.

The RINO's will do *nothing* to address any of these past 10 years of Marxist malfeasance which has culminated with this current Cloward-Piven cabal.

And since the Marxists will not be aggressively pursued with criminal and even treason trials, they will regroup, double-down, and return in 2016, or even beforehand, with baseball bats a-swingin'.

Hello XenokRoy,

No. The president can only lead. He needs a congress that will work with him. In many ways the congressional race is more important than the presidential. When the system is working the congress keeps the president from overreaching, yet actively follows his lead with prudent measures. We do not want a congress of sycophants who will deny the president nothing, like we had for the first two years of the present administration. More importantly we need to elect statesmen instead of politicians! Our races have become beauty/ popularity contests. Sometimes I believe we would elect better leaders if all we knew of them was what we read of their own words and what was printed of their actions of record.

If real positive progress is to be made, we must fix congress! Congress must step up!

Regards,
O.A.

I have a sister that works as a loan officer for a major bank in the area. She has told me many times that small and medium business after business feel the same way. My question to you is if we get a different president do you think it will really make that big of a difference if congress does not step up and take control of the budget and other responsibilities it has from the executive branch?

I agree with Pat Buchanan's analysis that we should have stayed home and left Stalin and Hitler wear each other down.

Furthermore, as it was, we hanged Himmler and Israel hanged Eichmann, but the necks of the war profiteers who financed both sides remained remarkably rope-free.

Hello WesleyMooch,

You may be interested in the following excerpts from a Thomas Sowell article. There is a link to the entire article.
Socialist or Fascist-Thomas Sowell on Obama

Townhall.com, 06-12-2012 by Thomas Sowell:

It bothers me a little when conservatives call Barack Obama a
"socialist." He certainly is an enemy of the free market, and wants
politicians and bureaucrats to make the fundamental decisions about the
economy. But that does not mean that he wants government ownership of the
means of production, which has long been a standard definition of socialism.

What President Obama has been pushing for, and moving toward, is more
insidious: government control of the economy, while leaving ownership in
private hands. That way, politicians get to call the shots but, when their
bright ideas lead to disaster, they can always blame those who own
businesses in the private sector.
...
Mussolini, the originator of fascism, was lionized by the left, both in
Europe and in America, during the 1920s. Even Hitler, who adopted fascist
ideas in the 1920s, was seen by some, including W.E.B. Du Bois, as a man of
the left.
It was in the 1930s, when ugly internal and international actions by
Hitler and Mussolini repelled the world, that the left distanced themselves
from fascism and its Nazi offshoot -- and verbally transferred these
totalitarian dictatorships to the right, saddling their opponents with these
pariahs.
What socialism, fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common
is an assumption that some very wise people -- like themselves -- need to
take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and
impose those decisions by government fiat. ........

http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassow...
page/full/

Regards,
O.A.

Was anything settled? I did not think it was as if, I thought the same problems were still around at the end. Well really we have been in a state of holding since we decided not complete WWII and leave half of Europe under communism.

Now we have the dark ages from the "church" returning with a different "church" that wants you to worship its leaders, not the creator but the leaders.

Hello Eudaimonia,

I have been in manufacturing for over three decades here in Michigan. It has been lousy here for at least ten years , but the last six since the democrats gained prominence in the congress have seen it go from poor to just scraping by. I have reduced my labor force and overhead as much as possible to survive the reduced demand. If we are subjected to four more years I fear I cannot tighten the belt anymore and others like me feel the same. I do not believe an economy without a strong manufacturing base is a recipe for prosperity. Four more years with this president un-phased by re-election concerns should scare any businessman not on his crony list…
Regards,
O.A.

I have nothing to say about either candidate, except that the incumbent's talent is smoothing over the rift between the Stalinists and the Trotskyites in American politics, and his challenger's is giving Fascism a facelift. It's as though not a damn thing were settled by WWII except Israel.

The silence is deafening in here... I think the Gulchers (Gulchians?) have already left.