- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
We had 6 to 8 huge bins, labelled Household or Garden Waste. The public would dutifully separate their waste & dispose of it in the correct bins. Throughout the day, lorries would collect the bins & dump the contents - regardless of what it was, into the same hole in the ground. It was a big fat lie to get the public to comply with 'environmental' muscle. This was of course government subsidised. I suspect things have moved on since then & more waste is actually recycled.
Of course now there are even more categories & sub-categories of waste to contend with, so the public are forced into either giving up half of their living space to accommodate extra bins (in certain areas, fines are issued for putting bins out on the wrong day), or sifting through dirt on their hands & knees like tramps at the recycling centre, in order to appease the great & all knowing environmental god. The public of course have to pay for this non-service. It's called Council Tax.
I do not think recycling programs should be subsidized. I would totally pay for a privatized service to pick up my quality materials, like cans and white paper (worth most $$), and deliver them to a local manufacturer. The benefit I would receive for my payment is the knowledge that every bit of usefulness is being squeezed out of these products before they go into landfill.
You need to see that BullShit episode about recycling, eitheror
Simply because Xcel wasn't "going green" fast enough. Anyone I tried to talk to about how much it would cost the taxpayers AND most likely how inefficient the initial system would be responded with "but Xcel is a big corporation".
Today I'm celebrating earth day by doing what I always do: recycling (to be efficient with resources) and biking to work (because it's good for my body)