

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Some clothing may also follow. Me bad dino.
There's no government
like good government.
And good government
. . . IS WORKING!
(The above is similar to an Alabama Dept. of Corrections bumper sticker)..
Can you day "Duh"
Who spent money on that study, likely us tax payers as some favor to some educational institution with a grant for a research project.
Of course it was only over the course of the last 100 years that people could work within climate control and not even today can everyone claim that advantage.
I can't remember any office where the temperature was perfect, but it was a lot better inside than outside most of the time.
Thanks again to Mr Carrier (and to the power generating companies.)
The solution--I disconnected the thermostat and put inside a preset unit. They could happily adjust all day long with no change, and I bought each of them a small electric heater they could keep under their desks.
I understand that biology keeps more of their blood at their center than men, but there doesn't seem to be an acceptable middle ground that they agree to. After the disconnected thermostat idea, I kept the office at 72 summer and 75 winter and it seemed fine as long as they had their under desk heaters available.
The only two answers I've ever heard for temperature choice was to save money (warmer) or to keep equipment cool (colder).