It's clearly a waste of your valuable time to continue any discussion on this website since anyone that disagrees with you is lacking your knowledge. Relieve yourself.

Killing something just for satisfaction is illogical and wasteful, unless it is protecting the animal population from starving, particularly an animal that is as limited in population as a lion.

This is like air or noise pollution, with a person compelling others to participate in this transaction. Clearly there is a matter of scale. With a mouse, no third party is even mildly affected. Not so with a lion, particularly this lion. There were 250,000 lions in 1975. There are 25,000 now.

Maybe khalling had a different objection with the national parks statement that came before my relating human to animal life, which is a separate issue probably deserving a thread.

I don't see the sanctity of human life fitting into any comment about killing a lion or a mouse, which I guess is my lack of ambivalence. I just don't see the equivalence. Humans are omnivores and are hunters and hunting provides a satisfaction at conscious and subconscious levels.

Jimmy Kimmel crying for a lion with crocodile
tears. Agree with you about not caring what he
says (or cries) about anything. I consider his
views as trivia and can count the times I've
watched his program on one hand.

"The animus towards him is probably misplaced."
To quote the same film, who ever said the human race is logical. :)
I think I saw that in the theaters when I was 12 y/o.

"not interested in getting votes. correct or incorrect is not a popularity issue."
In the mirror universe, Spock has a beard, Peter Keeting is a hero, Roark is a villain, and a reaction and approval of others is very important.

Agreed with Pope to not damage or take catholic property.

Then why did they pay off 100's just here in US. What did they do in central and S. America.

They killed little girls poisoned on Ergot, after torturing them.

Right.

Oooops. Mormons

Good one!

Iraq and Afghanistan. Neither one endangered the US. The hi-jackers were Saudis.
The Germans marching into Russia and Poland. Neither one threatened Germany.
The Spanish invading and killing the Aztecs. To steal liver and gold with priests along for their souls.
The Americans marching and killing on the Natives. To get gold and to get land.
The Americans starting a war with Spain for a 'black flag' sinking of the USS Maine. To kick them out of American concerns.
The Americans starting a war with Vietnam for a 'black flag' attack on a US cruiser. Military/Industrial complex wanted money.
The British marching into and killings South Africans. To get gold and diamonds.
I'm pretty confident there's several more.

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness rely on the morals of Christianity.
2. The Founders were profoundly Christian and founded America on Christian moral values.
3. Killing a lion has any whatsoever to do with human morality
4. Prostitution is a moral evil.
5. You think that your religious proselytization is of any import on a site for those interested in AR and Objectivism.
6. That Western Civilization is the only moral one.
7. Christianity is superior to Islam and different from Christianity.
8. Acceleration due to gravity is 32ft/sec/sec.
9. That I used a parachute. I waded in with 'stomping in the mud boots'.
10. That you have the intelligence to participate on this site.

That might be good.

Does that baseline include 32ft/sec/sec.