Argentina ambassador pick, and Obama bundler, has never been to Argentina

Posted by mminnick 12 years ago to Politics
17 comments | Share | Flag

Qualifications for the positron --Obama Bundler or should it be Bungler?


All Comments

  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I thought the quote came from Lenin? Could be Stalin though. Agreed on the heart attack deal. Based on the slightly veiled comment by B. Ayers in a interview he gave several months ago, it's probable that they poisoned him via the tofu Andrew ate. Not sure how they got the coroner.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MattFranke 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Wasn't it "Uncle Joe" that said, "It's not who votes that counts; its who counts the votes."
    Didn't vote for Prez the first time in 2012; wrote in Ron Paul the two before that.
    As far as the suicides, I think the heart attack seems to be the new favorite means of making people hold their tongue. Far easier to stage, and less evidence to deal with, unless you have to off a coroner as well. (Think Breitbart and his coroner)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ah. You're correct about the killing of Paul or anyone who's seriously against the Federal Cartel, or I mean, the Federal Reserve. When Hellary becomes the first female dictator, just watch for the wave of "suicides" during the rest of 2016 of those who opposed her. The game is rigged and I'm not voting for the 1st time in my life in '16.

    IMO, voting works on the very local level, once you go State and definitely Federal, the Elites control that outcome.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MattFranke 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Tongue in cheek sarcasm. I was suggesting that they would run him *because* they believe in the curse and would rather it be Paul dead, instead of say Billary Clinton or Little Joey Biden.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I can't imagine why the banksters would back anyone who'd want to take them on. I'm a bit lost on understanding your first question.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I knew of the first one. I'll have to look into the other things you mention. Got references? Much appreciated.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess you missed Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, jailing hundreds of northern publishers for disagreeing with Lincoln's oppressive policies, and ordering the arrest of Chief Justice Tanney. Lincoln also refused to even meet southern leaders and discuss a peaceful compromise, instead preferring to force a military confrontation he knew would lead to war.
    'lol'?
    Are you forgiving all of Lincoln's crimes because he printed greenbacks? Lincon would never have taken that step if he hadn't undertaken the most costly (and unneccesary) war in American history to reward his corporate political sponsors.
    Lincoln sought power and would do anything to get it, including seizing unconstitutional dictatorial powers.

    I'd put Lincoln in the same pot of boiling tar with the banksters.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MattFranke 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    So, are you suggesting that the powers that be may try to get Rand Paul or some other libertarian type elected in 2020?
    As to Jackson, you are correct, but it was an attempt none-the-less. As I recall, he then proceeded to beat the man with his cane. Tough ole bird!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    The Rothschild's sent a jackass over to assassinate Prez A. Jackson because he successfully prevented the resigning of the 2nd Bank of the US's charter. BOTH pistols did not fire. BTW, Prez A. Jackson was a fervent believer in God.

    I have the references, but not at the moment I'm afraid.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    See where you are going, but I'm not sure there is a causal like between central band and the assinations. Also note that Andrew Jackson was not assinated. The Mexicans were much more likely to try that than a set of bankers.
    There is a much mor likely scenario. The curse of Tecumseh. After the betrayal and murder of his brother and many others Tecumseh cursed the office of the president starting with Harrison. [see last paragraph] but every president to hold office after that who was serving in a specific date was assassinated. The one to break the chain was Ronald Reagan. He was shot but didn't die.
    The curse is:
    Tecumseh's Curse: Presidents elected in a year ending in a zero would die in office.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by MattFranke 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Let's see; Presidents who told the central bankers to shove off????
    1. Andrew Jackson
    2. Abe Lincoln
    3.James Garfield
    4.JFK
    See where I'm going?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not sure there has ever been any proof offered that the Rothschild's hire anybody to assonate Lincoln or any other president.
    As near as I can tell JWB was a southern sympathizer who was working with a small cabal to assonate Lincoln and several cabinet members to prolong the war and ensure a southern victory by causing turmoil in the North. They executed their plan after the war was over and thus had no impact other than to cause almost a century of Northern oppression of the South (don't get me started on that one, please.)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by UncommonSense 11 years, 12 months ago in reply to this comment.
    ?? lol. Um-yeah. Actually, Prez Lincoln created his own currency (much to the horror to the Rothschild's in London, Paris, Hamburg, etc) and in the end, they hired an idiot who assassinated him, thus ending the era of "the Greenback."

    No dictatorship there I'm afraid.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 11 years, 12 months ago
    Once upon a time, political appointees to significant positions had to be competent and experienced. That ended around the 1860's with Lincoln's rise to dictatorship..
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo