The U.S. alone funds over 20% of the cost of the U.N. with tax payer dollars. This is some of what that money is spent on.
UN Panel Claims Sacred Blessing for Homo-Lesbian-Transgender Agenda http://www.jbs.org/united-nations/un-pan...
UN Move Toward Confiscation of Private Weapons http://www.jbs.org/legislation/un-move-t...
Obama Paves Way to Arm Muslim Brotherhood-linked Regime in Somalia http://www.jbs.org/united-nations/obama-...

The International Court of Justice is located in The Hague. At least if all the U.S. hating world organizations were in one spot it would be easier to ignore them.

i'm probably the kid in the room with a megaphone that has no idea what i am talking about but here it goes.

I understand about the founders wanting us to be ever vigilant for people that want freedom from there government and be a guard against socialism.

Your saying that the only way the U.N. can operate is with the help of the U.S. because it's problems cost more than they take in. They have the same problem that we have so funding them will just put us further into debt. The U.N. is already coming apart due to their bad policies so wouldn't we be meddling in their affairs if we give them money to keep operating in their bad policies or would it just be turning a blind eye to it? Why should we prolong the collapse of the U.N. when we already know that it's coming. I mean there is already chaos going on all over the place in the U.N. and they are blaming us for it. So why should we help them get mad at us?

I do not understand the Hague reference?

The founders said we should be a shinning example. They didn't say we should give money or meddle in others affairs. If the U.S. pulled it's funding from the U.N. it would collapse. If the progressive, one worlder, socialist want it, then set it up in The Hague.

The US must do a "John Galt" and shut down the motor of the UN. It's time to pull out and shut down the UN. How about it move to Egypt or Iraq and let the "peaceful Islamists" get a front row seat in the UN arena. Should be better than reality TV.

well what would you do if the whole world hates you? Would you continue to give them all your money knowing that they do not appreciate it or would you pull all of the support from that country?

I do not call myself a libertarian, in fact I am still trying to figure that out ,but probably an objectivist ether way. I know that America is the symbol of freedom and we must help out people who want freedom. I would love to see that but America is in no state to help out people who use that money against us.

I agree with certain parts of their policy. Reducing military bases abroad, reducing redundancy within the branches of the military, I disagree with their isolationism.

is that good or bad?lol

you might want to "like" her page on FB
http://overmanwarrior.wordpress.com/2013...
Your comment about the UN is a big Libertarian difference from other political parties

no why?

did you check out overman's post on libertarian girl?

well that's enough to make me want to pull my money out of all the countries and just let them deal with it on their own. Then we will not be "taking over the world" and we would be better off and save money at the same time, Excluding Israel of course.

We need to disentangle ourselves from this totalitarian propaganda machine, and kick the UN right the f out of the US! This is an atrocity, that such an ass is speaking this bs, and not getting his mouth sewn shut!! I'm really outraged, can you tell??

Another glaring reason why we need to get out of the U.N.