Why do humans have to be owned?
Posted by j_IR1776wg 9 years, 9 months ago to Philosophy
A recurring post here in the Gulch for the past several years asks whether the government owns you of if you own you.
Why do humans have to be owned at all?
My whole life I've been told that:
1) god own me.
2) my parents own me.
3) government owns me.
4) I own me.
But I've never read any proof or justification of why exactly is ownership of humans necessary?
In logic, the offering of a limited number of choices as if they were the only choices is a fallacy known as bifurcation. Is this what we are being offered?
Is ownership of humans necessary?
Why do humans have to be owned at all?
My whole life I've been told that:
1) god own me.
2) my parents own me.
3) government owns me.
4) I own me.
But I've never read any proof or justification of why exactly is ownership of humans necessary?
In logic, the offering of a limited number of choices as if they were the only choices is a fallacy known as bifurcation. Is this what we are being offered?
Is ownership of humans necessary?
Previous comments... You are currently on page 2.
Am I getting warm? Or do you intend to enslave me as well?
From there it will be much easier to the straight up historical books.
Many of the professor written books are victims of a. the publish or perish crowd whose views are tainted with some other agenda such as selling required text books.
Insofar as movies are concerned the choices are far more limited. We Were Young And Soldiers and Forrest Gump (really I'm serious) were the only two about Vietnam with any reality or accuracy. One example of a book with accurate quotes from biased and self serving sources is Lam Son 719 about the Laotian incursion in 1971. The author didn't dig near deep enough.
Divorce=> reasonable solution. Enjoy your 'own' new life, Jolene.
i.e., contract (legal) slavery?
Just askin'
To use the word ownership regarding oneself is meaningless. The self-reflexity goes round in circles. It is another example of putting words into a sentence with proper grammar that means nothing.
See Bertrand Russell- whether the class of all classes contains itself.
Better to say that the individual is Sovereign.
Was this an innocent question or do you really not know/understand the history there? What were the chances of any intelligent slave, in any slave society, of escaping?
It sounds like she didn't go out and live her life as she believed, and she didn't want to see you live as you believe because misery loves company.
If that is true, maybe that might help you not be angry at her for telling you not to live your dreams. She didn't do it herself, so she's not singling you out for mistreatment.
Load more comments...