[Ask the Gulch] People complain but in 200 plus years and more have never thought it important enough to amend the Constitution on a variety of subjects. What's your favorite candidate?

Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 10 years, 10 months ago to Ask the Gulch
75 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

Mylist would start by replacing people with citizens for census purposes followed by putting the old versions in the back and showing the amended version in the front. That way northern democrats would not have to keep apologizing for the 3/5ths rule. I might also like to see a mandatory first page to all congressional bills. Title, One paragraph mission statement or statement of intent and extent. Next Constitutional Cite to check validity. Estimated Cost and finally Source of Funding. Two other add ons might be if a dollar is taken from A to fund B then how does that affect C since A no longer has a dollar to spend in their store? the crowining touch would be denying anything which did not fit the description in the Mission Statement.

My last submission is initiative, referendum and recall for all States specifically including State Delegates to the US Congress.

Your turn!


All Comments


Previous comments...   You are currently on page 2.
  • Posted by $ nickursis 10 years, 10 months ago
    Along the lines of this question and discussion, here is an interesting article on an upcoming Supreme Court hearing: What is a Voter, or what is required to be used when defining districts? Just from what I read, I am inclined to believe that their argument for the plaintiff makes sense, using total population adds in all those unable to vote, illegals, felons, etc who do not vote and can have a disproportionate effect. I would think measuring all 18 and above, US Citizens, non felons would be a good enough definition, and it is up to the government to prove who is who. But then, all they have to do is manipulate the proof needed and it all goes back in the toilet, except for the over 18 part.. I am no fan of Huffington, but this is a decent write up, but some noise mixed in...

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-b-...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I guess it depends upon expectations. I started as a programmer on mainframes. Our Univac mainframe cost upwards of a million dollars and required a staff of four highly trained programmers to manage the OPERATING SYSTEM. We had crashes all the time.

    WIndows is vastly more complex than such operating systems and is vastly more reliable. Does it crash and have problems, sure, but then I guess I expect that as a part of complex computer systems.

    For the last twenty one years I've run a company producing a product that relies on the windows operating system and I feel that it's been there for me.

    Like you, I never buy the leading edge, so between waiting for things to settle down and having lower expectations my experience is different.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That was not meant as a throw around comment. it was meant as a statement of fact and applies to every thing since DOS 1.0. Vista and the hatchet job they did on FoxPro were just prime examples.

    As for the legal phraseology I have started investigations with far less probable cause. However ... to defend MS if the public want's to be fleeced and hasn't complained that much for what thirty years Caveat Emptor. My system of waiting at least three years has worked well. I'm now on W7 and have no intentions of upgrading . but I didn't pay three or four thousand for a $100 dollar product. instead I paid $160 for an acceptable product. Well we didn't agree on this one but the the rest of your posts are well worth the read!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I was on the city council one time by the simple expedient of announcing i was available for appointment. No election. Two years later we couldn't get anyone to run for Mayor. I refused to run but then put an ad in the paper stating if the votes were in my favor i would serve but I woudn't run. in the middle was my phot with a sombrero crossed bandoleers and a big mustachio drawn on my lip and with the caption Votes! i don't need no steenkin votes. The next day two others filed. But i still was on the city council. I thought about a picture of hillary attired in similar fashion but I didn't want to insult our neighbors in the other United States of....
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Everyone has their opinion. Yours are obviously strong -- but throwing around terms like criminal because a product is promoted as an improvement (I doubt windows has ever been compared to popcorn) is inappropriate.

    I have been using Vista for years and am quite satisfies with it (typing on it now), so as far as "drove off the market" not so much.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Oh please! I watched an election for a county commissioner seat where a non standard republican was upsetting the incumbent by 200 votes. Mysteriously, in the weeks after, the lead shrank and shrank, until the incumbent won by 12 votes. Really? The County Clerk recounted how many times? That is my reason for #5, I really do believe they lie, and they lie for whoever tells them to. We saw so many recorded issues with voting last presidential election, I will bet Hillary will win even in states where she doesn't even campaign. Magically, as if all the machines defaulted to her.....by golly maybe they will...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    No ....just Microsoft whic made a career out of representing their new release as the best thing since popcorn and never, not once, put a working product on the market. Woirse they took other programs like Foxpro changed the name and turned it into one of their horror stories. That hardly classifies as All. I never use MS products until they are at least three years old by which time they may have most of the Bdeta testing done. How do I know. After the miliatry and before the mrchant marine in the days of XT to 386 our store was one of their test sites sites. We put that advice on a dot matrix banner and hung it for all to see. I use others as you suggested. Firefox, Opera, Open Office to name a few. No honest developer makes the claims MS advertising does. And no honest developer takes a working program and intentionally makes it non-functional then states you should have hired a programmer to the general public. Which is exactly what MicroSoft told us. I could only include there was a pay off somewhere.Not a mere suspicion by todays standard but probable cause. Let's see Central Point Software's file management program is another example of turning success into garbage. But then I am not a programmer....I am however a veteran user with the ability to teach my customers so I was on the other side of the fence. I was also once upon a time a police officer. Conspiracy to defraud is the exact words I would write. MS programmers in Seattle were still defending Vista after consumer outrage drove it off the market.Vist wasn't wasn't anywhere near ready to sell as a working product. Never did figure out why they needed five writing programs notepad, wordpad, works, office and the DOS used after a C:\ prompt for editing.

    Too much wasted time - but it's not all bad. I didn't like Mac either but that was poor business ethics.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Then don't buy his product. If his product isn't providing value for you then you should buy someone else's. If no one else's product is providing you with similar value then he is providing value.

    He does not warrant his software as bug free. No software developer does and all software has bugs. So, you are declaring that all software developers are guilty of a criminal offense.

    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by blackswan 10 years, 10 months ago
    How about, no government interference in the economy, except to eliminate government interference in the economy. A second one might be to make all laws self terminating after a fixed amount of time; in that way, we don't end up with zombies that live forever, doing damage all the way.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Especially that idiotic Oregon vote by mail from out of date addresses nonsense. Fine if they want to do it at the State level up to Senators and Representatives as selected as state employed delegates to the national Congressl but not on the national offices of President and Vice President.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 10 years, 10 months ago
    How about States Rights trump Federal Gov't and Individual Rights trump State. Group rights neither represent themselves above the State or Federal. A group can't represent an Individual or the reverse of said statement. A group will not exert their philosophies on religious practices of other groups of organized peoples reverse of that statement holds true also.
    Those groups whose behavior is considered aberrant to the norm must have anthrpological evidence that such behavior preceded civilization; to be recognized as a minority cultural norm. Conjoining of said group subset by mutual consent would only be recognized by state by state so long as doesn't conflict and/or supported by above statements.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 10 years, 10 months ago
    My wish list is:
    1. Term limits of no more than 2 terms in any office Senate or Congress.
    2. Elimination of all donations to political candidates, except from individuals not to exceed 100.00 per person.
    3. Yes on the recall idea. Makes them accountable.
    4. All voting must be in person and you must prove that you are: a. Alive. B. A citizen.
    5. Balllots must be counted in a public forum open to all to view.

    Pretty simple, over all.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    i have to agree with that and don't agree most states are more conservative.. the delegates would be chosen by the State Government itself for one reason and they are selected primarily from the heavily populated areas which are primarily not conservative.

    In other words SOS - think chipped beef on toast.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Not anywhere in the document. Might be confusing that with the winner take all delegates to the electoral college which is another POS that needs changing.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ask and thou shalt receive. One star and did you read the Couch Potato Poem I posted some time ago? I shall have to write a new verse or version!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Because he puts out an inferior product with each new release, gets the customer to pay for the beta testing and glitch fixing and does so repeatedly. Another name for that is conspiracy to defraud.. It's a criminal offense.it's also a RICO violation. Now quickly....donations to which half of the government party is going to keep him out of prison?

    Democrat Republican.

    Simple as that.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    That's another one like education not being in the document and people instead of citizens for a census. The only reference to welfare is ''general welfare'' and that's in the mission statement paragraph. Nor is the welfare system general by any means. You can't give Alfie a dollar unless you take a dollar from Bertie. And if you do that takes money from C-Z where the dollar would have been spent.

    More to your point it isn't a right provided though i would have to check each State's constitution to verify that.

    Oregon at one time used it's head for something besides backwards beanies and offered to pay transportation and six months food and rent to anyone agreeing or applying to go elsewhere where their was employment. It was cheaper than endless welfare payments for Appalachia West. One acquaintance went to Michigan to operate heavy equipment and now is down in Florida where most of the productive Michi-ganders migrate for a big pay raise. Just by ducking Michigan's taxes.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Of course. They have an overly vested interest so it's something like automatic insider trading. Practically speaking they have a very poor track record. Thin.- very thin, I would much prefer qualified people.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Two points! However you might want to stipulate 5th grade education in what year or century. For me, my 8th grade English is now college level - maybe. Excellent. I'm convinced though many of our current congressionals would be caught short by such a stiff requirement. That's a bad thing?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I had to check that and it's true. The 16th just changed Section 9(4) regarding apportionment and enumeration or census. What it legalized is the concept that Congress could take in unequal amounts with no limits. One more point for 3. I still like to see it made history.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago in reply to this comment.
    It's only as good as those who are selected to run the system. They are only as good as those citizens select to run the system.

    Be careful what you ask for. For sure you will surely get it. BOHICA!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ 10 years, 10 months ago
    Excellent discussion and comments. I agree the 17th and replacing the 16th with an end user consumption tax should follow as those were the two that slid us into a socialist roader nation.

    Income tax gives the power to the government and is fascist in nature.

    A consumption tax gives the power to the citizens and producers of the nations wealth and gives the power to the citizens.

    Government then becomes as it should always have been the temporary employees of the citizens the true source of power or what used to be called divine right 230 years ago.

    Citizens, Family, Country, Government - in that order of importance.

    Maybe next time around.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo