Engineers and Jihadi

Posted by $ MikeMarotta 9 years, 3 months ago to News
60 comments | Share | Flag


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by khalling 9 years, 3 months ago
    2 military bases-gun free zones. Like an Airforce without planes. Like a stripper with clothes which never come off. Like a bible thumper without the good book. a zebra without stripes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Governors in six states are now arming their national guards. One of them encouraged soldiers to obtain concealed-carry licenses and the guns to go with them. Do you really want an armed military within the United States?

      The Texas Military Department headquarters that I report to does have armed guards at the gates (they work for a different division within the department), with 100% ID check and cargo check for delivery vehicles. At several of the national guard posts I have worked at, while much of the front area is open to the public. to go further, you must show ID to armed guards. The tension, though, is the proper role of the military within a constitutional republic on a foundation of democracy.

      (We can debate democracy elsewhere, but I point out that at the local level, anyone who can vote can run for office, while President of the United States must be a natural (not naturalized) citizen at least 35 years of age. That hallmarks the difference between a democracy and a republic.)

      Your zippy quip failed to address who actually carries a sidearm in the American military. We inherited and embraced a class-based system from the British: "an officer and a gentleman." Officers carry sidearms to shoot their own soldiers who do not obey orders, and conversely to protect themselves from that rabble. Soldiers on guard duty carry rifles, not guns. Though exceptions are all up and down the line, that is the general rule.

      So, now we are arming soldiers with handguns. Maybe that is a good thing and maybe in another generation, we non-coms will call each other "sir" and "ma'am" and salute each other when we pass… and then dance a bit to decide to gets to walk on the right…

      There is a lot more involved here. After 9/11, the NY City Hall pushed the people back with hard barriers that are still in place. All federal office buildings, and many state have TSA-type screening. And, riding a Greyhound from Michigan to Texas and back, I met the TSA screening people in Memphis. Think about that. That, the Patriot Act, the NSA domestic spying, and more,l happened because of reflexive responses to 9/11.

      If the assaults in Chattanooga (which were only the latest in a series) are the result of an open society, then, I agree, k, that we should discuss those issues, and that analysis requires more than a zippy one-liner.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 9 years, 3 months ago
    Not strictly to MM's post, but still relates:

    "..published five years ago .. but the gentle patter of reassuring words about the peaceful nature of Islam will have a familiar ring. Here was another bright young Muslim woman assuring a dutiful reporter that her faith, .... is a creed inspired by nothing but love, peace and lashings of good fellowship .... "

    "There's this misconception that Islam is a violent religion," she continued, "Muslims are actually peaceful."

    The speaker was Yasmeen Abdulazeez.
    Last week her brother, Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazeez 24, attacked two US Navy recruiting stations, murdering four Marines and wounding a police officer before being shot dead.

    http://quadrant.org.au/ essential reading

    http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/li...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
    We engineers are more likely to be nerds. We often get jobs where we feel like pawns of people who stand on our shoulders without understanding what we do. I've seen people become bitter and assert their dignity by making bosses beg them publically to get something working. Maybe a handful of engineers take if further and resort to mass murder.

    It goes against a rationalist engineer's inclination, but having a positive and helpful attitude is hugly powerful. Attitude is what makes the bitter engineer start his own company that produces huge value instead of languishing in poorly-run institutions that Lucky mentions or worse.

    I agree with most of Lucky's comment, except for the part that says we have X number of STEM jobs and a greater number of STEM people. There's an infinite number of jobs if people look hard enough for ways to use what they have to produce things others want in exchange for money.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
      Not philosophers, not politicians, not writers, poets, artists, or truck drivers. They are all needed to an extent, but it will be the engineers who will save humanity if there is any humanity left to save. (No, I'm not an engineer).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
        No Herb, I think not. I think it will be the 2% - and they, the innovators, will be scattered amongst professions. Remember - the best chance we have had so far at creating an effective Warp drive came about because a young mathematician tried to figure out how the engines of the USS Enterprise worked. Roddenberry's creation of a TV SciFi series may have been our key to the stars.

        No, I am not a writer but I observe that we go where inspiration leads us.

        Jan
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
          I think there will come a point where applied science implemented by engineers will be the only way to escape the madness of those in power. But it's pure speculation. When it comes to speculation at this stage of civilization, your ideas are as good as mine.

          Since you brought up Rodenberry, let me insert a thought. We assume that Star Trek is about future adventures. Instead, what if it was a long time ago (not in a galaxy far away). We think of mankind as being around 200,000 years old, but it could just as easily be a million years or ten million, evolving to a certain point and then destroying itself. Geologically speaking, 200K years is less than an eyeblink.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
            This is an intriguing idea and one that I recall from some old SF stories, but actually we have a pretty good diagram of human history from Miocene apes to the present day. This history is not complete, but it is at a better than 'connect the dots' stage.

            Any substantial civilization on Earth would have left traces in both material goods and in genetics. We can chart the genetic migrations from tens of thousands of years ago, and the molecular clock of our genes puts limits on when we separated from our predecessors.

            So there is no opportunity for our having a high tech civilization that predates our own. The closest we can get is Minoan, which may have had differential gears (certainly, the Antikythera device that dates to BC had them) and which civilization left fewer traces than we would like. We are dealing with bronze age technology, here, and not starships. It would not be possible to hide the remnants of that advanced a tech.

            Pity, though - I like the thought. What we know from archeology and paleogentics can rule out a prior cycle of civilizations here on earth, and comparative genetics can show that we evolved here from earlier life forms.

            I sometimes wonder where we would be now if Minoan civilization had not been destroyed. Would the Romans have had railroads? Telegraphs?

            Jan
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
              I doubt if any trace of any civilization that would be attributed to a civilization would be left after, say, 500K years, or 350K years. If we are talking about Mars before it lost its atmosphere, millions of years.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
                We have archeological traces from that far back. We have evidence of early tool use (stone tools used to cut meat from bones) as far back as 3.4 million years, and bone cuts plus stone tools at 2.5 million years.

                Modern Homo sapiens didn't evolve until about 200K years ago (we can trace this through the genetic clock); close predecessors (H. erectus) had stone tools and was similar to us at around 500K years ago - their average brain size was slightly smaller, but overlapped the lower range of modern humans. The first plausible evidence of human habitation dates from 2M years ago; the first wood and stone shelter with an internal hearth is from about 500K years ago. The first manufacturing site found is a ocher processing plant with several cement hearths in Sibudu, Africa, from about 60K ago.

                So, there are remains of fragile archeological evidence (bits of bone, wood, and hide) from several hundred thousand years ago. If you wan to postulate a high tech civilization, you have to have a path of remains that go from stone to metal to technical. We have such a path, and it leads to the history we know. It is not plausible to assume that there was a prior high tech civilization when there would be massive traces of the evolution of that civilization - complex civilizations do not just spring out of a hole in the ground - plus a huge amount of evidence of the civilization itself. If we can find fragments of hide shelters from the last ice age, we would be unable to miss a starship building depot.

                Jan
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
                  Thank you for the lesson, Jan.
                  BUT who is talking about plausibility?
                  One of the things that steered me to objectivism was the attempt to find sanity in an insane world (universe?). To the extent that objectivism has allowed me to function and understand to a limited extent what is going on around me, I do pretty well. But I still have that small unresolved space reserved for the implausible. When I took up the attempt to understand quantum physics in order to buttress my dealing with reality, I found it to be not only implausible, but improbable. But there it is. I can't make it go away. So I hold that area open like a guest that rarely shows up, and now and then indulge in the "what-if" that is reserved for sci-fi. One of the things I find fascinating is the responses I get in the Gulch which are scientific, analytical, and surprisingly fanciful. (You are included in there somewhere).
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
                    I admit that my discussion of the archeological record mentally ended with, "Oh darn!" because it would be a lot of fun to discover that there had been a prior high tech civilization on Earth.

                    My personal version of what you said is that I am a scientist...and a poet. My scientific side sees chloroplast based life forms responding to high and low pressure areas; my poetic side sees dryads dancing the trees.

                    I actually do not find a conflict in this.

                    Jan
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by Herb7734 9 years, 3 months ago
                      I'm not a poet, but sometimes a rhymer.
                      I don't see a conflict either. But I rather suspect that there are more scientists who can do poetry, than poets who can do science.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
                        Ha! Right.
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 3 months ago
                          Jan, I watched the movie Noah during this past week on vacation.
                          have you heard of any evidence of large groups of drowned humans
                          back in the past? -- j
                          .
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by $ jlc 9 years, 3 months ago
                            There are some Mesopotamian finds of instances when the whole area between the Tigris and the Euprhatese Rivers was under water. "Noah" has its origins in Mesopotamian myth (Utnapishtem)- some of this biblical text is very close to the original in the Gilgamesh epic.

                            If you are interested, I can try to find out more precise details (had to look up Utnapishtem already!).

                            Jan
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
        I'm an engineer, and I agree with the importance of engineering. I note, though, that Apple makes phones that people value more than Samsung phones because of the value artists add to them.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by BrettRocketSci 9 years, 3 months ago
          I agree with you. Since I've become a student of business innovation (and learning by doing) I've gained a much greater appreciation for the value of artful design within the highly technical trades. Art (or passion and creativity) combined with "hard" skills beat the dry implementation every time.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by VetteGuy 9 years, 3 months ago
            This is a good point. I have known a few engineers with a healthy creative side (my daughter is one, but the creative part didn't come from me ;-) ), but most seem to be the problem solver type (more like me). Linear thinkers ... If A, then B, then C. Unfortunately this does not lend itself to "thinking outside the box".

            If you can assemble the right team of creative types and engineers, you can create some amazing things (phones that are basically small computers, cars that drive themselves, etc).

            A creative engineer MAY be the best of both worlds, but may also come with other quirks (OCD, fear-of-failure are just a couple I have seen). I don't have a big enough sample to say whether this is a side effect of balancing the creative with the more logic-oriented, or is unique to the few I have been around.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      The difference is cultural. I agree that most of the engineers I have known are, as you say, positive and helpful. Anecdotes and confirmation bias aside, I think that the difference is cultural. America is a democracy, and I mean that not in the narrow, political sense, but in the broad sociological sense. Ayn Rand pointed this out in her comments on our labeling Presidents of the United States by nicknames, FDR, JKF, and Ike. I believe that both Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were on the ballots under those monikers, rather than James Earl Carter and William Jefferson Clinton. The point is that we are all pretty much equal here.

      On the other hand, in the old world, the Middle East in particular, social status is important. In sociology we call then "high context" societies where family connections set your rank. Thus becoming an engineer not only is supposed to elevate you, of course, but your family as well. So, they have a lot riding on this.

      As for the stories you opened with, I guess we could call them "evil Dilberts." Yesterday, I bought my fourth collection of Dilbert Comics. I am working on a full set. But as you pointed out, that bitterness is contrary to a general mood. I add that like bittersweet chocolate, you need a little contrast for good enjoyment.

      My anecdote: I worked with a Middle Eastern engineer who was incensed at having to drive compacts when renting at the airport. "I look like an unsuccessful salesman," he said. Status: it's so unAmerican.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Lucky 9 years, 3 months ago
    MM the question is good but the inferred answer is wrong.
    I think you will find the correlation predominates among western educated muslims.
    ( Ahmadinejad notwithstanding)
    The reason is widespread disillusionment which comes from a popular myth we are all immersed in - that is - we need more science technology engineering management graduates. This myth is a consequence of the growth of credentialism , the growth of tertiary education as colleges becomes businesses dependent of government money, the myth benefits the education industry, even non-technical people are vocal proponents. The intelligent and upwardly mobile youth study hard in STEM, borrow, then find on graduation that jobs are sparse. most of the jobs are in big corps with security clearances and stereotyped recruitment, governments are the worse. Since the jobs are in big corps, there are inevitable big layoffs, these can be hundreds or thousands, the experienced and qualified then are looking for work among a vast cohort. Yet they still hear the myth that we need ....
    It may come from the big corps, it helps to have a ready supply of labor for the next gov contract they will bid on.
    This hits the new migrant family the worse, youth with better contacts and sources of advice have a better chance of finding better career choices.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 3 months ago
      STEM... the latest Religious Movement.
      While so many people complain they can't find high-paying jobs, they simultaneously complain they can't find a good carpenter, roofer, plumber or electrician to work on their homes... while those markets are so poorly served that lots of incompetents exist in the market, degrading the image of 'brain AND muscle workers.'

      And migrants flock to the US and permeate the construction business... go figure. Some do excellent, hard work; others sleep on the job. I've seen both at my house in the past few years.

      And a few comments about 'engineers.'
      Engineers are tasked with implementing or designing solutions that will solve problems or meet needs. Someone defines the problem and engineers research solutions and lay out plans for which solutions would work best, fastest, cheapest (or at least two of those three...)

      Science provides the toolbox; engineers conceive of the tools to meet the needs. Worker bees put the parts in place. Customers use the solutions.

      And when I entered the job market in 1968, EE's were scarce and in demand. Some years later, as usual, there was a glut of engineers churned out by colleges and we suffered. Same as all the other pendulum-swing over-reactions that always happen in a free market. The pendulum's period might be years or decades, but pretty much everyone insists on 'solutions' that will show results next month. And are constantly frustrated when the results don't show up.

      After college, I was at a company with a shitload of engineers, and unlike claims above, it seemed as if a LOT of us had Jewish backgrounds or history. So much for generalizations.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Lucky 9 years, 3 months ago
        plusaf- I like your comments. As MM says, many anecdotes. But still, this pendulum thing, yes it is a characteristic of free markets, but it is more than that, it is inherent in all natural and human systems. Humans cannot stop it but they can make it worse, almost any attempt by government makes swings worse. The popular myth about 'we need more STEM' does not make this swing worse, as it continues regardless of what happens it just makes the supply of qualified technical people permanently too high reducing the cost at the expense of the supply of plumbers, roofers, and trades in general.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
        Critical analysis takes us beyond statistics and anecdotes. Dissecting a case study is another way to look at a problem. Then, it can be associated with other, similar cases to generalize a valid explanation. As you say: "And migrants flock to the US and permeate the construction business... go figure. Some do excellent, hard work; others sleep on the job. I've seen both at my house in the past few years." But I have seen that among American-born engineers, also, when I worked at the Chrysler Manufacturing Technology Center.

        And the general statistical summaries in the two papers I cited did not say that engineers become Arabs. It only pointed out a strong statistical presence (40% to 60%) of engineers among jihadi.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 3 months ago
          Good points, Mike, and makes me wonder, too, what be the influencing factors!! I could guess a few things that might do it, but none of them sound right to me.
          Need more research; that's for sure!
          And hell, yes, my examples were anecdotal. Too many "proofs" are!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      If you read the original papers cited, you will see that this is a factor in the Arab/Islamic countries. Education is supposed to be the path to success, and they find themselves unemployed and impoverished because the economies of their nations are wrecked.

      That being true - and that applying here, as a well - I perceive an important cultural difference. Here if an engineer is laid off, she finds some other way to make money, to capitalize on her skills, rather than just blaming the system - which she may well do with full justification. She takes responsibility for her situation, even though it was not of her making. That is a western attitude. In truth - hang on - that is a premise of Existentialism: you did not make the irrational world you were born into, but you are morally responsible for your place in it.

      That is different than the Arab/Islamist worldview of the jihadi - or others of their kind, even in here in the USA - who blame others and who cannot get past that.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 3 months ago
        Mike, I completely agree... there are many cultural underpinnings that could be blamed for those reactions, and 'education' alone probably isn't the panacea.
        For every one that says 'we need to address the culture,' I'll bet there are several others who'll defend 'the culture's right to stay the same.'
        Impasse.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 3 months ago
    An engineering education can provide the tools with which to accomplish things. Whether those things be for good or for ill depends on the philosophical underpinnings of those who learn. This is precisely why we require some ethics content in an engineering education, and more humanities courses than most engineers deem necessary. Please pardon the analogy as it is most definitely not Objectivist, but I liken it to the training of Jedi knights. If there is not sufficient philosophical training to accompany the technical, then the knight goes to "the dark side". Ms. Rand really captured this aspect in the Patrick Henry University training of the characters of Galt, D'Anconia, and Danneskjold. This is an issue I am constantly concerned about.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by BrettRocketSci 9 years, 3 months ago
      This is a great point, but still not the same issue. Which is an apparent major inconsistency in epistemological values and practices. I noticed this as an undergrad in aerospace engineering at Purdue (in Indiana). Lots of engineering students who were also devout Born-again Christians.
      I struggled to understand (let alone debate) how they could be so analytical and scientific about engineering and physics yet not apply that to their religious beliefs. I still haven't figured it out, but I suspect it's analytical powers turned into powers of rationalization. Given X, a driven analytical mind can figure out a way to arrive at Y in their own mind.
      Engineers also love order and predictability.
      Maybe Eric Hoffer and his "True Believer" book has some clues for us?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 3 months ago
        Regarding engineering students who are born-again Christians, I have seen many students attracted to the mathematical nature of crystallography serve as a starting point toward development of how materials self-assemble. Like Objectivists, the born-again Christian engineers often have a strong motivation toward understanding the fundamental aspects of existence.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
        That is the salient point of the two papers that I cited. Engineers are different than scientists. Scientists are more akin to lawyers in their outlook, at least insofar as neither group is especially religious.

        "Whether American, Canadian or Islamic, and whether due to selection or field socialisation, a disproportionate share of engineers seems to have a mindset that inclines them to entertain the quintessential right-wing features of “monism” – ‘why argue when there is one best solution’ – and of “simplism” – ‘if only people were rational, remedies would be simple’. "(Gambetta and Hertog page 50)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 3 months ago
          That is an interesting insight regarding monism. It is a tendency that I have to train my engineering students to avoid. In engineering, there are almost always multiple possible answers. Defining what is "best" depends on the value assignments as to what is most valued. As someone on the border between science and engineering, I definitely agree with your assessment regarding the religious tendencies of engineers vs. the non-religious tendencies of scientists.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Marshall Thomsen of Eastern Michigan University - my alma mater - has been teaching “Ethical Issues in Physics” for over twenty years. A search of “ethics physics” and similar items will return citations to Dr. Thomsen’s work at websites from the Illinois Institute of Technology, the University of Illinois, the University of Massachusetts, and Physics Today, among many more.

      When I had the class, he was on sabbatical and our professor was Patrick Koehn. The class also has been taught by Prof. Mary Elizabeth Kubitskey. Dr. Kubitskey’s master’s thesis was Teaching Ethics in a High School Physics Class.

      By a roundabout way, I have an anonymous citation in a book on engineering ethics. “Of Owls, Wooden Walls, and Flower Girls,” in 4Es: Ethics, Engineering, Economics and Environment by John St. J. S. Buckeridge, Sydney: The Federation Press, 2011.

      In 2011, I delivered a program on academic fraud and research misconduct, especially from police crime labs. (See CSIFlint2011.blogspot.com)

      So, I approve of your school's requirement that engineers learn to consider the ethical ramifications of their work.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 3 months ago
        Accreditation criteria dictate the ethics requirement. See 3c, 3f, and 3h in the link below. I would incorporate ethics without the requirement, but all universities are required to address ethics. Interestingly enough, the engineers' code of conduct says that our primary responsibility is to the general population, rather than customers, selves, bosses, etc. This is of course contrary to Objectivism.

        http://www.abet.org/accreditation/acc...

        Have you been back to Ypsilanti recently? I enjoyed my time there.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 3 months ago
    I am a few different things. One of them is a PE - professional engineer, graduated from the finest engineering school (arguably) in the nation. This twisted story reminds me of an event in my life. Several years ago I was invited to speak to a local junior high engineering/tech class about engineering. I thought beforehand, "How could I define engineering in a simple way?" I came up with the following definition..."Apply math and science in a way that makes the world a better place for humans." In my mind, that got the job done. I've used it ever since. People who shoot up recruiting stations or open fire in a crowded room don't fit that description. You could train a monkey to pull a trigger.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 9 years, 3 months ago
    I'm an engineer and find this correlation curious. . the art of design
    requires that an engineer assume the cloak of a mini-creator,
    but that is also true for any kind of producer. . the study of
    science to improve the lot of humanity is also common to
    many pursuits. . could it be the acceptance of dull mathematical
    constraints which frustrates the architect inside an engineer's
    "heart" which requires some sort of release? . I have known
    a bunch of engineers who love excitement, like roller coasters
    and motorcycles, Jeeps and mountain climbing. . maybe this
    correlation somehow connects with excitement. . and within
    Islam, there seems to be plenty of room for that. -- j
    .
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 3 months ago
      Interesting. I used to fly aerobatics. It was extremely exciting and the perfect of example of fully immersing myself in the physics I had studied in school. "Yep...a stall with rapid application of yaw DOES result in a snap roll! Yipee!"
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JoleneMartens1982 9 years, 3 months ago
    That paragraph was terrifying to me, the speech he delivered. So sad and so true, the US should not have attacked a thinking nation, because let's face it, ours by majority is not. And our leaders are the least thinking, they don't get there by thinking its by popularity. Also he makes the statement that God will back the righteous. We a Christian nation who have thrown out all the basic concepts of Christianity in hopes of forgiveness, should realistically shiver at that thought.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      Jolene, I am not clear on which "thinking nation" the United States attacked. Did you mean Iran? Iran seems formidable, but suffers from all the weaknesses of a controlled society, from intellectual drought to economic instability.

      I can accept that they have a good educational system and serious motivation for science and engineering studies. However, a society that hangs homosexuals is going to find itself lacking creative people. Even in America, you do not announce your atheism to your co-workers, but at least here, it is not a capital offense. And what if you do not want to pray six times a day? Here, we do not care if you go to church or not. Over there, the choices are not so broad. The bottom line is that a controlled society cannot stand up to an freer opponent.

      Appeals to God are fairly common. Both Germany and Netherlands had "God with Us" on their coins, just as we have IGWT. The coins of Austria declared their last emperor, Franz Josef II, to be an "apostolic monarch." The faith of Muslims is no less assertive or surprising. Jews, Buddhists, and Hindus all find encouragement from celestial beings. I do not mean just the people who happen to believe, but the leaders of those nations. The Dalai Lama is pretty sure that the Great Wheel of Life will restore Lhasa as it carries China downward. Most of the people whom I know who also admire the works of Ayn Rand would ask a more basic question at that point.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 9 years, 3 months ago
    Engineers are people who love to solve problems, when most people just seek to avoid them. This is why they never want to be done with a design, because it is not perfect.

    In my experience engineers are not at all easy to radicalize. They are serious skeptics!

    I also don't know about the number of religious engineers. Doesn't feel that way to me, and I am more open to discussions that would expose such positions than most people (uninhibited is often used to describe me, among other less positive terms).

    Maybe this was a study of engineers in Arab countries?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Radio_Randy 9 years, 3 months ago
    This guy was an engineer, but the attackers in 9/11 were pilots.

    It doesn't matter what field you're successful in...mass murder in the name of "Something" is possible to any crazed individual.

    Problem is...it's the average citizen, who wishes he could be a "Dirty Harry" and clean up the world, who is the one the Liberals spend all their time and effort demonizing, while ignoring the true crazies (who are, actually, more like them).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 9 years, 3 months ago
      The point of the papers that I cited was the the correlation between the mindset of engineering and the mentality of jihad is not accidental.

      http://carnegieendowment.org/files/09...
      http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/gambet...

      "Whether American, Canadian or Islamic, and whether due to selection or field socialisation, a disproportionate share of engineers seems to have a mindset that inclines them to entertain the quintessential right-wing features of “monism” – ‘why argue when there is one best solution’ – and of “simplism” – ‘if only people were rational, remedies would be simple’. "(Gambetta and Hertog page 50)

      On the other hand, aviation culture has not been identified with the same psycho-epistemology, even though the work would seem to be like engineering. See my post here in the Gulch on "The Virtues of Aviation Culture."
      http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 3 months ago
        Interesting - as I'm an engineer and a pilot. I should read those papers. I will. But, at first glance here I am reminded of Pol Pot's practice of killing engineers, educated, people who wore glasses...
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo