Good news is an article just posted says 68% see her as untrustworthy (really?), but they also see most Republicrats as well that way. The Donald takes a beating at 28% approval, no surprise there. And yes, she is a dumb broad. I cannot tell a lie.

Another step in the plan of "redistribution" of wealth from the producers(those who have invested their time, money and sweat to make a business) to the moochers. Which will translate into less jobs for everyone.
Basic econ. What a dumb broad.

Illustrative of why we need a comprehensive tax reform.

Just the opposite of the inflation they all encourage to help dig them out of the hole they dragged us all into.But for inflation you need some sort of pressure on the economy, which is just the opposite of what we have today. So go get the gold and silver!

The level of manipulation evident in all this is really disturbing..more so than what is in the Force...

Thanks for your post I rather enjoyed it.

I think the trigger for collapse will be deflation. When deflation starts it will be very quick and very harsh. Deflation both increases the value of debt and decreases taxation in the graduated tax system. It would be double whammy to all the central banks that I do not think they could get back out of. It is what they are attempting to make sure does not happen as it would be there death, and the death of the Keynes system as well.

Had not heard of that as a nick name, what a usurpation of an otherwise good name. That is the progressive way. Take something good make it mean something else to have people think that something else is good too.

I really do not like them taking that one
.

I do not disagree, but the scheme has worked for well longer than it was expressed in economic terms. It has a brief break in history here or there but it is the economic process, with more controls that has been used by kings for a thousand years.

Eventually something happens they cannot control. As I said in the original post, if they can keep the inflation from getting away from them they will get another cycle out of this.

This same cycle has been being used with larger and larger controls since WWII. It works, and I think I need to state, not in a good way.

The eventual end of the cycle should be to many on welfare and tax income losses due to no jobs = System failure. If we have to wait for this to happen our grand kids are likely to still be waiting.

In the short run, either deflation (which would stop this crap in its tracks) or hyperinflation (which would make for some awful times but not collapse the financial system they have set up) are the likely results.

You are correct a loaf of bread would be just under 30 bucks. You want a real lump to form at the base of your neck, figure the price of gas per gallon in that economy. You think this is unrealistic, compare the prices today to those of the 1915, 100 years ago.

Agreed that its another license to rip of the public. An elaborate one they will continue over and over again.

As far as guns, how many has it taken to enforce it since 1915? They have been doing this since then with ever increases controls and pressure. It will likely take about the same number so long as they continue to slowly turn up the heat. People will take it /sarcasm, its only a little worse we can still make it. No need to stand up to fight /sarcasm off

Guns wont be required until people cannot feed their kids, or at least fear being able to do so. That is what it will take to wake up the nation. How long it takes us to get there, who knows.

In 1915 a loaf of bread was $0.07 and I suspect the idea of paying around $2.50 for that bread would have seemed out of this world. 35.71 times as much. Apply the same rate of inflation over the next 100 years and you get bread that is $89.29 a loaf. Makes $27.15 seem a whole lot more plausible and a whole lot closer than 100 years away.

How does Soros Pay Yoda, the Star Wars Character?

but did your neighbor make any money?

I think that Trump and Jim Webb offer the outside edge. Trump doesn't care what anyone thinks and will say what he thinks, which is sometimes pretty bizzare, but then it seems they all have their moments. Jim Webb was the Secretary of the Navy when I was in and did a good job looking out for the enlisted, and seems more in touch with some semblance of sanity. Trump has the virtue of not being a politician and understanding how to manipulate money, after, he's been bankrupt more times than I can count.

Yes, and then you have leverage to get the policies you deem "correct". Follow the money..

Man, Yoda is awesome cant put him in with Soros! :)

Indded, that makes sense and is a good description of most "economic plans" from both sides. The bottom line is that the government has no moral right, or authority, to be making any kind of "plan" for the economy, it is all their flawed regulations and laws that have led to this mess, and the more they muck with it, the more the likelihood is of it imploding spectacularly, and then we will hear the infamous "pay your fair share".

Makes perfect sense if your a keynesian socialist.

In order to pay the debt down they must drive inflation up. Every time the dollar halves in value so does the debt.

Raising wages increases the average household income, which even though that wage will buy less makes people feel good. Couple with this a graduated income tax and you will get a larger percentage of peoples income without changing a thing, effectively increasing the income tax rate but without the requirement of stating or admitting it.

From the viewpoint of someone like her this has several winning feature.
Increases voter happiness
Effective reduction in debt
Increased Tax income
Ability to assume greater debt
* improved GDP to taxation ratio

All of these advantages are paid for by those that saved their money. In an economy like the one they have to create to keep from crashing and going into default money in a bank will loose value. Stock markets will not keep up with inflation. Things like Gold, Silver, Land and Fine Art will typically keep up with the inflation.

I recently read an economics article that suggested that in order to balance out the debt to GDP ratio they would have to push higher inflation for years yet to come. The estimate price of gold to stabilize the existing and planned debt, approximately $9500.00 an ounce.

In addition to that report, and with a bunch of history and data to back it up "The death of Money" also suggest a gold value of $9500.00 per ounce as the likely target to balance out debt to GDP and added that value as the base value needed to move to a global currency produced by the IMF.

The fact is if they can keep from having the inflation get out of control bad they will be successful in doing this over time and it will stabilize the economy and we will see a decade of boom or there about followed by another bust.

The model sucks, but if you are a have and have a lot it makes you richer and can be maintained. It also benefits the poor who have nothing. Its the middle class that get crushed under a Keynesian economic system.