

- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I like the renaming idea.
In case you hadn't noticed, I always call it the Dark Center.
Paraphrasing Luke Skywalker, "If there's a bright center to the universe, DC is the place that it's farthest from."
It is as if I am reading a new version of the book 1984. Don't they see this?
Jan
And its just gotten worse since then. All moves by this administration seems to be pointing in that direction.
been planned ever since his Re-election. Why
the surprise now? The only surprise would be
if it DIDN'T happen. Sadly, America has been
asleep at the wheel for tooooooo long.
Let the politicians and libtard revisionist citizens left behind stand naked in grass hopefully infested by chiggers.
This is why people are so ignorant of our past and the great men who built this country.
All of these distractionary tactics by the left are to keep us in reactionary mode and on our heels.
The truly sad part of all this is the constant caving in to these societal numbskulls by the politicians who are only interested in their political careers and NOT what's right.
As for the complex and multifaceted Mr. Jefferson, as much as we must admire his rhetoric on behalf of the rights of man, the rights of Sally Hemings were somewhat less important to him. It is not just that he owned slaves, slavery being simply a legal status, but that he banged the daylights out of a minor girl whom he owned as property. It was completely, totally, and irrevocably an unequal relationship. "The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other." [Query XVIII, “Manners” -- here: http://tjrs.monticello.org/archive/se...]
So, I would keep the Jefferson Memorial as a reminder of how internally conflicted America is. You gotta take the bad with the good. But Washington? In the libertarian science fiction series of the Probability Broach by L. Neil Smith, Washington was hanged as a traitor to the Republic, and Hamilton was exiled to Prussia.
A real "pater patriae", eh?
Jan
We should leave the Jefferson Memorial right where it is, and deport all of Fascist Liberal that are ruining our nation.
Of course, here's another I Could Say That But I Won't moment. In this case: I could say public education delivers horrible results. But I won't say it, because I do not argue from possibly bad results but from a basic premise that the government has no business meddling in education, aside from training military or police officers.
And who the hell told them their opinions and ideas weren't perfect demonstrations of the old adage:
'It's often better to be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt"
Or perhaps Cesar Chavez D.C.
Or maybe Mao-Tse Dung D.C.
Oh, wait, I've got it -- Benedict Arnold City D.C.
Or you could divide it into four sections and name each section with one of the above. Then, America haters who disparage the country of their birth can feel proud of an exhibition of some of those who have shown the opposite of what America once stood for.
Processing thought takes some effort.
We live in a society where our pop culture teaches that changing a name or a word recreates reality. ("You didn't build that...")
Reminds me of the ostrich that hides it's head in the sand. Nothing good can happen when your defenses consist of ignoring reality.
I'd just as soon take his statue down and put it in
a museum. Thomas Jefferson was not Jefferson
Davis. (And if, incidentally, blacks could also own
slaves, that does not make slavery any better).
As to history, Richard Speck was part of
our history. So was the Boston Strangler. Also
Al Capone. Does that mean we should erect
heroic statues to them?
Washington. At the time of the Revolution, slavery
was legal also in England. Neither man was per-
fect. Still, Washington freed his slaves in his will.
Jefferson, (unfortunately, and also reprehensib-
ly), did not. But I believe that the Declaration of
Independence, which he largely wrote, did lead
eventually to the abolitionist crusade, the Civil
War, and to the eventual freeing of slaves.
However, Jefferson Davis was the president
of the Confederacy, and, I have read, was a
slaveholder, and there is no reason why he
should have a statue like a hero's dedicated to
him in the public square and maintained at tax-
payers' expense. There is talk here (Richmond,
Va.) of talking the statues off Monument Ave.
and putting them in a museum, which I think is
the best idea. Someone else has proposed
adding Civil Rights' heroes statues to the Aven-
ue instead, but I do not think it is right to hold
those who fought for a cause, which, if won,
would have resulted in the continuing of slave-
ry, as "heroes" equal to those who did some-
thing positive.
Rename Washington DC, I think old George would be glad his name is taken off of it. Rename it Hell
Offensive. Symbolism over substance and political correctness run amok. Out of context history, cherry picked factoids designed to destroy entire legacies for satisfaction of the brainless.
Regards,
O.A.
Load more comments...