

- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 4.
--Alice in Wonderland Through The Looking-Glass -- Lewis Carroll.
Jan, amused
I doubt it will ever be common, because for most of us, living with multiple adults causes more stress than it avoids. I've tried it and wouldn't do it again.
I believe the abuse situations that most people in the West associate with polygamy (both because of that cult a few years ago and because of Islam) would be better prevented with legal plural marriage, because people who think their very living arrangement is illegal don't dare go to police for any reason.
Indeed the same argument can also be (correctly) made against criminalization of just about anything that was legal to do 100 years ago.
(We could even get those Thorium reactors, Thoritsu!)
Jan
However, if the family does well and becomes well off, then your theory is substantiated by the fact that then the younger brother generally splits off to get his very own wife. So this is a purely economic decision that allows a family to survive even under the most difficult conditions.
However, many cultures exhibited wife-sharing with high status visitors. These were probably not sissy-man cultures...
Jan
If he spent one day with each of them it would be 3.27 years before he would spend time with the first one again.
There are some great relationships.
I would suspect that we are looking at a multiple chain of events: better childhood nutrition leading to larger body size overall; a shift away from farm jobs to white collar jobs leading to physically weak office workers; the low-fat program resulting in obesity and diabetes; the athletic fad amongst affluent people somewhat reversing the effect of the initial shift away from manual labor and farm jobs.
It would be an interesting study...or probably, book.
Jan
Avg man today is 195 lbs. Average woman is 166 lbs. That would put the average strength delta at 31%-47%, depending on the 10-20% ratio. BTW in 1960 the average man was 166 lbs and the average woman was 140 lbs. I wonder how the strength to weight ratios vary from 1960 to now.
Communication begins with ideas naturally processed in the mind. The delivery methods may be aided significantly by tools such as this forum, but the communication itself is natural. The same with the Engine of the World: the only difference between the medieval marketplace and the marketplace of today (aside from the reach of government of course) is that of the aids afforded to those who peddle their wares.
In my mind there is a distinct difference between aids to a natural process and a wholly new process as she is suggesting.
I had frankly thought that we would see this happening in reality by 2015...perhaps it was more of an anomaly than I realized.
Jan
I like the FSM afterlife Q&A on this subject. "In heaven there are beer volcanoes and hookers. What about gay people? Do they have hookers too? Why yes, of course, but they are invisible to the straight people"
In so far as kids are concerned, there are a lot to adopt, or artificially inseminate, or wait until Jan's suggestion becomes technically possible.
If there is something particular, please PM me: I will be glad to help.
Jan
That would be Section one
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Text
The part used by the Supreme Court in one of the cites.
The chain led from rights granted by citizens to the State government to state government to oversight procedure only in those areas required by the Constitution.
Now as to the validity of the 14th Amendment. In common with the 16th Amendment on Income tax there was and is a question on validity. There was and is some complaints filed way back when.
Since then it's been sour grapes and hot air with no action by anyone to repeal or abrogate.
In other words you talk to the talk but are you wiling to walk the walk along and that question includes Mr. Scott and Mr Dilorenzo. Show me a valid action that is not just some scam to separate money from the gullible cherry pickers.?
I wrote a poem about that exact subject posted previously.
Ode to Prince Albert of Bore
Put it to rhyme
One line at a time
The election rout
Was never in doubt
Two centuries three decades
Have passed in a flash
There's been enough time
To cry, moan and whine.
You could have amended
But couldn't be tempted
Electoral still wins
Despite tears and whims
No matter the issue
It flew by and missed you
With never a question.
What need of elections?
The old constitution?
There's a new substitution
They'll tell us what's right
Three knocks in the night
Took your couch then your house,
For some mooching louse.
All that's left from the past
Is your couch potato ass.
Also applies to the 14th and 16th Amendments
I think i'll rededicate this to the Couch Potato Party who helped gave us a one party system of government
Load more comments...