- Navigation
- Hot
- New
- Recent Comments
- Activity Feed
- Marketplace
- Members Directory
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
Previous comments... You are currently on page 15.
.
And yes, we (the human body) is the most complicated mechanism in the known universe. There is nothing else that even comes close. Not only is the functionality the most complicated, but we also have the ability to understand, learn, create, reason, and on and on and on. Nothing else comes close. You mention the complexity of coastlines. That's is less than child's play compared to the human body. For starters, we have the capacity to discover and understand the complexity the coastline you referenced. This is not even a debatable point.
And yes, the laws of nature are the result of intelligent design. The laws a replicable and consistent across the universe. That does not happen by accident. To quote Einstein: "God does not play dice with the universe."
The alternative to my position is that a universe that operates in mathematical harmony is the result of random happenstance. What's your explanation?
Don't think so...
Unless you think you can take raw materials, toss them in a bin with explosives and get a 21 jewel perfect Swiss watch set to perfect time at the other end, no matter how many times you blow it up.
We know that things exist, even if we don't know where they came from. It's possible they always have. It's a much smaller leap to assume that than it was created by a being with no physical existence.
After the first trimester things certainly change, but before that it's not a contest of two equal interests, but entirely the life and liberty of the mother over the potential for a human life.
It has no more moral claim than do the individual sperm or eggs prior to inception.
My definition of faith as written specifically in the Bible is the only definition that matters, since it was the first definition of Faith as written by those who preached faith for those who practice Faith.
Merriam-Webster is an atheist tainted definition that is not applicable to anyone but atheists.
Load more comments...