Executive Order Banning Online Gun Discussion?
Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 10 months ago to Government
Is this just another Executive order to be used to trap 'domestic terrorists' or a tempest in a teapot?
The original document is at this link. Starts bottom-right of 1st page:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-06-...
The original document is at this link. Starts bottom-right of 1st page:
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-06-...
It's called shifting the blame.
I smell political blood and I don't yet believe they are as strong as they like to believe. What were those voting percentages again? this time they might be even better than the last. All it takes is one acceptable name. Sniff Sniff. Definitely a strong odor of exsanguination with s bit of the brown and the yellow..
I'm sure Thomas Jefferson's has been deleted from the Common Core Curriculum because it is to subversive. This govt would love to lead the nice citizen lambs to the slaugher.
Stupid is as stupid does. Should thought of that earlier. It's too f'n late.
The atmosphere was much more open and inquisitive than my first visit although one could still pick out the old time hard liners.
Not just as a techie, but as a user and freedom lover, I think the Internet is the best and most important thing to happen for liberty, potential world-wide liberty, since the printing press, and as such the most dangerous thing to liberty-haters/totalitarians everywhere. The current US government, the UN, and every freedom hating pressure group imaginable is going to push to regulate it, control it, and in the long run, use it for there own propaganda (think of it as Common Core on steroids).
The example here is just another, as Rand would say, "trial balloon"...and although I hate cliches: "a step down that slippery slope"...
To me, opposing regulation of the Internet is equal in importance to the fight against radical terrorists.
I sure hope it ain't law yet: In any event I'm taking my new Springfield .308 M-14 over to my sons in Eastern Washington to zero in the scope tomorrow. It is still almost free range over there and I'm not talking about chickens. My wife also needs to zero in the laser on her new Sig P238 Rainbow. I got her this for backup when her Sig P226 Navy just isn't appropriate, for instance when we go to a more formal function or go dancing where a lighter load will be a little more appropriate. We're going over for my grandsons HS Graduation party his parents are throwing for him. I got him a beautiful classic Winchester 30-30 Model 94, like he's had a hankerin' for.
Okay, now I'm grandfathered against the new law should it ever pass. I suggest everyone else do the same.
As much as Ovomit Breath moves his lying lips, you'd think he would not want to touch free speech with a pole ten trillion miles long.
The excuse will be - what about the Republicans? The answer is. What your left hand did and what your right hand did is no excuse especially since you have two left hands.
SOS has a new meaning. Same Old Stuff on a shingle.
Seriously one of their party giants in years past coined the phrase 'ánything said or done that promotes the party is the truth.'
His Marxist Majesty may excommunicate from his Commie Candy Mountain for a utopian paradise.
It's all part of his attack on the second amendment - remember his promise that he would use any tool he could find to end gun ownership and possession in the USA. Why not kill 2 amendments with one stone - and use "those evil terrorists" as an excuse to the sheeple that giving up your rights for security is right, proper, expected, and demanded of you.
My thoughts on this violation of our rights??
I prefer the 45 ACP. Very good defensive round. Relatively effective even using ball ammo. And Glock makes a fine firearm from which to launch said projectiles at those would do damage to or threaten our country or what it stands for.
Jan