The Unstable Element in the Inflation/Deflation Debate

Posted by Zenphamy 10 years, 2 months ago to Economics
21 comments | Share | Flag

The article asks the question, 'Who are the Owners of the Fed?'
Who do Bernanke and Yellen work for. Apparantly no one that knows is talking.

Is that as scary as it sounds?
SOURCE URL: http://www.freemansperspective.com/inflationdeflation/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by straightlinelogic 10 years, 2 months ago
    There is no institution more incongrous with a free society than a central bank. Once the means of exchange and store of value becomes the province of what is essentially a bankers' cabal rather than objective markets, that society is marching down the road to ruin. Money should not be part of the government, it should be a market function. I would say that there are probably less than a thousand people who know what goes on at the Fed and its interactions with the rest of the government, and that is scary indeed. In the absence of knowledge, there are myriad theories and this article's is certainly plausible. The Fed's public, 100 year record of currency debasement and cartelization of the banking industry is bad enough, and we do not know what goes on behind the scenes. It is hard to believe that a former friend of Ayn Rand's--Alan Greenspan--would take the morally dubious position as Chairman of the Fed.
    By the way, I write frequently about the Fed and markets on my website, straightlinelogic.com, and I have a novel, The Golden Pinnacle, which makes a straightforward case against central banking. I was involved with the financial markets for many years.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by scinch 10 years, 2 months ago
      What is the alternative?
      Up until the creation of the FED...there had been nearly 30K different types of currency in circulation.
      What about "Wildcat" banks? Would we want a return to that? Just some questions to ponder/discuss.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Commander 10 years, 2 months ago
      Would you consider this series by Jake Towne a reasonable source for the layman? The Money Matrix – Prelude (PART 1/15)

      I'm a fairly quick study, but, need to get my head wrapped correctly around the "basics". Then...into your archives....again..
      "The power of a question"...priceless!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 10 years, 2 months ago
    It doesn't sound scary to me. The Federal Reserve system is "owned" by banks, but officials appointed by the gov't run it. The system is supposed to maintain a low, stable, and positive rate of inflation. The money supply in the short-run should be consistent with the goods and services in the economy.

    The result is we have a reliable medium of exchange that roughly maintains its value over several months. We don't want to change our menus every week and don't have to worry about having a small stack of cash being eaten away by inflation. We might want _never_ to change our menus and have things stay always the same, but that's impossible given how the economy changes over the years with new business developments.

    All my adult life the Fed has done a good job of maintain low, stable, and positive inflation, although I vaguely remember high rates of inflation as a child.

    The controversial result of the Fed system is that it can attempt to "prime the pump" if nobody's hiring until people start buying and nobody's buying until there are more jobs available, resulting in building, workers, and equipment sitting idle when they want work. This system is far from perfect, but I find it preferable to priming the pump with gov't spending or arbitrarily picking some commodity that may gain and lose value on its own as our medium of exchange. I clearly understand the idea of doing nothing and just letting people prime their own pump, as it were, but it appears to work okay to have a national bank do it.

    Some people say the system enables deficit spending, but I think that's only true to the extent that being the world's reserve currency enables deficit spending.

    I wish we could have a committee similar to the Fed Open Market Committee that could tell the gov't how much deficit or surplus to run. There are loads of problems in the details, but I like the concept.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by scinch 10 years, 2 months ago
    The owners of the Fed are all member banks. They own stock that is NOT available to the general public. US Govt gets some oversight with Chairman and a few other appointments, but otherwise it is a private banking system.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo