Irony...

I didn't work Thursday night. The reason given... I was being "given" a 3-day weekend. So, I was the only one who ended up getting a 4-day week.

My immediate boss did what he could to mitigate the damage. He had me stay an extra two hours Wednesday and Thursday mornings, picking up garbage around the parking lot in the freezing mist so I only lost 4 hours or so. (I was so exhausted I slept 12 hours yesterday).

Lesson (finally) learned; I work for the 20th Century Motor Company.

I had an interview where I was asked whether I liked working in teams or independently and why. I was interviewing at a not for profit. I answered that I see advantages to both then I went on to say that I liked working in groups because I appreciate that everyone brings something unique to the table. Later I thought I should have used a collectivist slogan as an answer.

You are incorrect.

The gender gap has been a fact since women started voting. Women vote for social welfare programs and irresponsible spending policies to fund them. It's not just Obama. As I said, Obama is a SYMPTOM of the greater problem. My bet is that Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Schumer, Reid - all would have lost, but for the female vote. And that's just the tip of the ice berg. The gender gap in the last election was on the order of 20%. Most elections have historically been decided by considerably less than that. Look at the Bush/Algore election results. Algore won the popular vote, but through the magic of districting (and about 500 votes in Florida), he lost. We got Bush instead (a horrible, horrible president - but better than Algore). Interestingly, had it not been for senile old jewish women in southeast Florida, Algore would have won. Seems the Demoncrats had gone down to all the rest homes in Palm Beach County, rounded up the old biddies, put them on a bus and told them, "Vote for #2". This was the infamous "butterfly" ballot fiasco (ironically designed to span two pages because it allowed for larger type - to make it easier for the walking dead to vote) where the 1st candidate (Bush) appeared on the left, the second candidate (Buchanan) appeared on the right page, and the THIRD candidate (Algore) appeared on the left. The second hole belonged to Buchanan, but the second name on the left page was Algore.

So the brain dead, putrefying old sacks of grease did as they were told and Buchanan got 3400 votes - something like 6 times Bush's margin of victory.

Which just goes to show that even when women have no clue what they're doing, and they're trying to vote to screw America, they can still screw up the vote and accidentally do something that's not as wrong as what they intended.

Obama's a POS. But the problem is deeper and more widespread than Obama.

Good interview though.

>> As the author of the book, "Men on Strike" wrote, men are dropping out of higher education, declining to marry and avoiding future responsibility. In effect, they're going "Gulch". They're exercising their prerogative to stop supporting women and the world women want.

From the link you referenced:
>> Dr. Helen Smith joins Steve to discuss her new book, "MEN ON STRIKE WHY MEN ARE BOYCOTTING MARRIAGE, FATHERHOOD, AND THE AMERICAN DREAM - AND WHY IT MATTERS

How did you miss this??? Blindfold and earplugs?

As for voting for Obama - are you saying the women in the Gulch DON'T KNOW ANY WOMEN WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA? Because if you do, it's time to start holding them accountable.

Okay, we had another meeting this morning.
Apparently the knockback to 4 days was rescinded, at least for now. Dunno if there was too much uproar, or if it was plans leaked too soon, or what.

But I'm still going to look for that part time job, just in case.

Here's the current solution among men: Quit.

It's sort of interesting actually, the parallels with the Randian approach. Women are the leeches who are sucking the life blood out of society so they can feel more "secure". And men are getting tired of it. As the author of the book, "Men on Strike" wrote, men are dropping out of higher education, declining to marry and avoiding future responsibility. In effect, they're going "Gulch". They're exercising their prerogative to stop supporting women and the world women want.

As women make more money - who gets taxed? As women can't find a husband who wants to work - who gets to do all the earning? As men see no reason to marry, who has to do all the "courting"? And when divorce comes around, women will begin to pay more alimony. Oh YEAH! And now that there's no combat-exclusion rule, the Supreme Court will have no choice but to mandate women register for selective service, the draft, and compulsory service when the powers-that-be decide to feed flesh into the military-industrial-complex meat grinder.

See what I did there? Women are finally getting their dream - and it's going to be a nightmare! The $211-trillion in unfunded mandates lthey've voted for works out to be an additional $5,000 a year in taxes for every worker - for life! That's on top of all the current taxes. Pay up gals!

I think I'll go sit on a couch and eat bonbons. Once the TV networks wise up and realize that it's guys sitting at home doing nothing while the wife-unit is out earning the wages, they'll switch the daytime programming from "Maury" to sports and the transition will be complete.

You know, if you don't recognize a problem, odds are, you can't fix it.

Obamacare is a symptom of a much deeper problem. We all love to hate crappy politicians who keep screwing us over… but who elected them? Women vote irresponsibly. They spend tomorrow's money today. And they insist on politicians spending tomorrow's tax money today.

If you don't fix THAT, then Obamacare doesn't matter because it's just a small part of the myriad ways that women will continue to destroy America. In 2013, America spent $415,688,781,248 on debt service… over $1300 for every person in America. That's cash money straight out of your pocket because women voted to spend money we don't have.

This time, it's biting YOU! So, how do you like it? How do you like working two jobs? How do you like getting screwed over by the one-size-fits-all health care plan? How do you like working harder, longer and earning less? Do you enjoy the feeling of insecurity? Do you like knowing that if you get sick, all the money you're wasting on "health care" is money thrown down a rat hole because you probably won't have money for the deductible? Do you like being afraid because you're no longer in control of your own life? If you like it, THANK A WOMAN. If not, try addressing the core problem. It's not Obamacare. It's not even Obama. It's the people who elected Obama.

Women.