12

Dirty Harry is in trouble with the PC police...

Posted by AmericanGreatness 8 years, 10 months ago to Culture
77 comments | Share | Flag

Yet again, point out the absurdity of a situation, and you're the cretin. The ever open-minded, tolerant left... as long as you agree with them 100%.
SOURCE URL: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/s/clint-eastwood-mocks-caitlyn-jenner-022400319.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
    Why are we glorifying this abnormal behavior? Yet again, an infinitely small percentage of the population is redefining "normal" and demanding that the rest of us accept the false view of the world.

    Now, for recognizing abnormal and calling it out, we're small-minded bigots. Bruce Jenner is a man, no matter what new name he has or how he dresses... PERIOD.

    Johns Hopkins has it right: http://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-mchugh-...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by livefree-NH 8 years, 10 months ago
      Your choice of words is exactly correct. "Abnormal" has a well-defined meaning in the world of numbers where I live (I stare at spreadsheets and regress data all day, but also see http://j.mp/1KQ78XQ and http://j.mp/1KQ8KAG ) . Look at the bell curve, and look at all the little dots under the big fat bulge in that bell curve. Those are "normal". Celebrities, by their nature and the definition, are not normal.

      I saw a picture of present-day Jenner, next to a picture of that basketball guy Dennis Rodman. They are both sports personalities who are in the public eye. But I wouldn't call either one of them "normal".

      Actually, I think that being a celebrity, or a sports legend, or even someone on a box of Wheaties, de facto makes you abnormal, in the statistical meaning of the word.

      Myself a Libertarian, I kinda want to be left alone. I even think of myself as one of those dots that is not under the fat part of the bell curve. Abnormal? Maybe. Yet here I am, reaching out to this group of like-minded Gulchers wanting acceptance and to get a thumbs-up, too!

      No one is shoving my post into anyone's face, yet I feel like the world is shoving Bruce Jenner's little story into my face, all day, every day, and then pre-judging me for how I will react to it.

      I believe THAT is the abnormal behavior which is offensive.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ sjatkins 8 years, 10 months ago
      WTF? No one is redefining normal at all. People are learning there is a bit more variety in terms of gender than some thought and admitting it is not a matter of "abnormal behavior" in the sense of something pathological at all. Those are simply the facts of reality. Get over it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 10 months ago
      The left just wants the right to react and remark on their repulsion so they may be put down as intolerant.
      I say "Blaugh!"--and if you don't like it, I lift my teeter-totter theropod dino tail over you.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Temlakos 8 years, 10 months ago
    I saw all the Dirty Harry films. Dirty Harry was in trouble with the PC police before anyone called them that. That's why I supported him, and was happy to see Clint Eastwood become a suburban mayor, even if only for one term.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by injun2 8 years, 10 months ago
      Actually, Clint was Mayor of Carmel CA, a very pricey liberal enclave. I lived there 3 years, moving shortly before he ran for mayor. There were rules for everything- no live music after 9pm, illegal to wear high heels, you can not trim a tree on your property, you have to call the city arborists (to be done in proper "Carmel" style)....on and on. The reason Clint ran for mayor was because they wouldn't let him put in a window in his restaurant overlooking the picturesque outdoor bar, the Hogs Breath. He ran for mayor, won, and got his window. Also, he managed to get rid of the ordinance prohibiting eating ice cream outside...they feared getting drips on the sidewalk....oh no!
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by fotoldy 8 years, 10 months ago
    BFD Clint Eastwood has more class in his little finger than most of Hollywood has in their collective. His statement was not that offensive compared to what they say about people who disagree with their leftist and progressive behavior. Bruce Jenner should expect some joking and criticism. What he did to himself was disgusting.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 10 months ago
    Eastwood's remark was hardly even a joke. Banning such innocuous words by the PC Police illustrates how far we have fallen in the desecration of the English language. If this keeps up, language will be reduced to using only words and phrases as bland as fat free lactose free, milk.
    One more leftist stupidity to rage against.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Rex_Little 8 years, 10 months ago
    Even by PC standards, I don't see what was so offensive about what Eastwood said. I mean, Jenner WAS a famous athlete. If not for that, nobody would care if she had man parts, lady parts, or reproduced by fission.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
      100% right... doesn't matter though. You either genuflect at the alter of the left (no matter the issue), or you're a racist/bigot/homophobe.

      Similarly, it's impossible to disagree with Obama's policies on substantive, intellectual level. You either support him, or you're a racist.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 10 months ago
    I have a real problem with being forced to accept what Jenner did with open arms. I, personally, am repulsed by it. I wish the guy the best. The story just churns my stomach. The media is obviously used as some sort of social engineering tool...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ sjatkins 8 years, 10 months ago
      Forced acceptance? It is simply none of your business. No one should give a shit what your opinion of it is.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 10 months ago
        That's my point. If it's none of my business why is it plastered all over the news? I don't want anybody to give a shit what my opinion is. If I don't think it's healthy or normal for men to do this to themselves let me keep my opinion. Don't have this shit in primetime where I have to explain it to my 5-year old. Might as well have Jenner take a shit on the desk of a news crew and have me explain that to my kids too while we're having dinner.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Technocracy 8 years, 10 months ago
        The reverse is also true. Why do YOU care what anyone's opinion is?

        Why is it a national news story?
        Because the people pushing a certain agenda want it to be one. No other reason.

        I do not care what Jenner does, and anything you or I do produces the same concern from him.

        But here's the rub, Jenner CHOSE to make this a very public event, not a private one. By doing that he is deliberately courting public reaction. And especially negative reaction, since controversy brings reward to "reality stars".
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 8 years, 10 months ago
    Jenner is chasing the spotlight. Again.
    He's like an over the hill child star, but instead of doing drugs or drowning himself in the bottle like many has-beens he feels he must share his complete failure in life with everyone. And the lapdog media, thinks this is entertaining.

    I give him 18-24 months.
    Any other guesses?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ sjatkins 8 years, 10 months ago
      Jenner is not a "he". That is the entire point. To claim someone would go through all of this in order to get attention is the height of absurdity. Gender is a trickier thing that you seem to think. Some are born cross-wired with the brain gender wired differently from what the sex chromosomes may have to say. Hell, something like 1 in 2000 births by the literature are actually intersexed to some degree at the genitalia level. People that hang out in an objectivism related or at least alluding to site don't get to deny facts of reality.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by Technocracy 8 years, 10 months ago
        Absudity is not acknowledging that Jenner is being very public with something that does not have to be public.

        Why?

        Nobody puts themselves through this kind of public crossfire without a reason that is compelling to them. Advancing the GLBT agenda is insufficient. If it were, he would have been prominent enough in that movement to be publicly associated with it long ago.

        A change like this is a process of years, it does not happen overnight.

        Give Jenner the benefit of the doubt all you want to. But dont expect everyone else to. Further, ease up on implying or flat out labelling others absurd or stupid.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 10 months ago
    The left are absolutely correct to expect us to treat LGBT people as normal. But they ought to be able to take a joke like this one. Phooey on both sides.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
    I do not understand. What is wrong with someone changing their gender? It is their body and their life and as long as they are paying for it with their bucks, it is just fine. If someone feels more comfy being a gender they were not born in, then more power to them to change that aspect of their lives. If they want to be 'something in between' genders, then that is fine too.

    I am in favor of the individual and the right of the individual to choose their own course in life. I do not find it in any way wrong or abnormal to change genders, have a facelift, or get tats all over your body. I may not choose to do this, but that is my right to choose too.

    Jan
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by khalling 8 years, 10 months ago
      hmm, I don't find it "wrong," but I make a big distinction between getting a facelift and changing genders. But people surely discuss "normalcy" and objective reality. If you are a person who reasons gender change is mutilation, and even if you want to be abhorred by it, you are now the abnormal one expressing an abnormal opinion. I don't care for that societal pressure. Caitlyn's coming out was indeed an attempt at glorifying her sex change. She has to be prepared for some backlash.

      I had a discussion, maybe with Zen, one time about adult incest. what two adults who are consenting get up to-right? Well, probably as a mother, I am so horrified by the concept-I would never support it as being normal or sane for that matter. Am I being perfectly objective?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
        I do not actually make the same distinction you do: to me, getting a facelift or tats are the same as changing gender: You are sculpting your body into what YOU want it to be. (You and I agree on societal pressure.)

        On the topic of backlash - yeah. That is fine. Other people have other opinions and they should be able to state them. You can mod your body; they can rag on your for so doing.

        Egyptian and Polynesian monarchies encoded adult incest into the marriage customs of their royal families. So did European dynasties, though they had to get the pope's permission (and that would not be for siblings or offspring). Unlike you (and I am not a mother, please note), I have no problems with the concept of incest.

        Jan
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
          You have no problem with incest... uh what???

          I think we've officially jumped the shark here. If we're at a point where there's not even agreement on the fact that incest is anathema, we're at an impass.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
            Then we are at an impasse. I have no problem with your disagreeing with me.

            I also have no problem with incest, plural marriages, and a lot of other things that I regard as 'no business of anyone but the participants'.

            Jan
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ prof611 8 years, 10 months ago
              Jan, you sound like the only objectivist in this discussion! Gender change and incest are no business of anybody else.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
                Exactly. I cannot really imagine these folks endorsing a law that says, "Society has a right to control the sexual habits of consenting adults."

                Perhaps people are reacting to their personal preferences and the projecting their emotions. I certainly have 'my own' preferences, but it is no concern of mine what other folks do - within the stated parameters.

                Thank you for your response.

                Jan
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
              • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
                Gender change is the business of others, when opinions against a labeled hate speech in an attempt to redefine normal. The majority is then made to suffer the tyranny of the majority (for example, we are now forced to pay for health insurance that covers gender reassignment, because to argue against is discriminatory). The personal choice now affects millions.

                On the incest front, I'm frankly shocked that anyone would even attempt to advocate for this. Free markets (and freedom itself) must be tethered to morality, or it will go the way of the Dodo.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by $ prof611 8 years, 10 months ago
                  1. The fact that we may be forced to pay for gender reassignment is no different from our now being forced to pay for maternity benefits, even if we are men!
                  2. Freedom may be tethered to morality, but not the kind of morality you are espousing, which violates people's right to do what they want ( unless it interferes with someone else's right to do the same ).Consensual incest is one of those rights!
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
        Those that are shocked by this story/issue are NOT the abnormal ones in the discussion.

        Seeking a sex change is the abnormal behavior. By not recognizing it as such, we are ignoring the real problem these people have. The compassionate thing to do is to urge the Bruce Jenner's of the world to seek psychiatric help as is now advocated by those that first pioneered the procedure only to realize it was mistake (see Johns Hopkins article-- http://www.wsj.com/articles/paul-mchugh-...)
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
      I don't care if a person wants to change their body either, but this type of mental illness should not be glorified and certainly not called "brave".

      A far more caring societal attitude would be recognizing it for the metal illness it is and encouraging psychiatric help.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
        I don't consider it mental illness. I think of it more like having mousy brown hair and dying it red because you always wanted to be a redhead.

        Jan, does not dye hair
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 10 months ago
        Wanting to change his/her hardware is not brave. Doing it is not brave. Doing it even though it's going to result in people like you spewing hate *is* brave.

        What business is it of yours?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Mitch 8 years, 10 months ago
          I agree with your assessment that whatever someone does to themselves and to the ones they love is none of my business. My issue isnā€™t the act that is the problem, it that they insist in making their business public; furthermore, not only public but accepted and celebrated. His business is now my business because he has gone public with his business and Iā€™m told that I must accept his lifestyle as normal.

          In a free society, I do not have to accept someoneā€™s lifestyle as normal or acceptable, this is my business.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by teri-amborn 8 years, 10 months ago
      The "Y" makes the "guy". It would be easier to thread a camel through the eye of a needle than to REALLY change a man into a woman.
      To successfully do so one would have to change the individual's genetic code.

      However, I DO think that will eventually be a possibility.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
        There are natural XY females. The part of the Y that triggers the rest is one tiny little gene on the tip of the non-homologous portion. If that gene is defective, then all of the other sexual differentiating genes don't 'fire' and the fetus remains female. (In our species, the fetus begins as female and differentiates into male if it has a functioning Y. Other species work differently.)

        You cannot distinguish a natural XY female from an XX female - they have periods and breasts and all other characteristics we associate with being a woman. They cannot get pregnant (naturally - I believe one has done so with modern med techniques), but since many women are sterile that cannot be used as a distinguishing characteristic.

        So, while you need a Y to be a guy genetically, having a Y does not insure that you are. (And there are a lot of other natural XY combinations that are interesting.)

        Jan
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
          The bottom line is Bruce Jenner will always be a man. It doesn't matter what body mutilation occurs, he's a man (as is any man going through this process), just as any woman mutilating herself to achieve the opposite will always be a woman.

          An apple can be painted orange, but that doesn't make it an orange. A is A. To deny facts is to deny reality, and that's what this entire media frenzy seeks to do. They want us to believe that he isn't really a he anymore or she really isn't a she.

          I fully expect to wake up one day soon and hear the booming voice of Rod Serling narrating our PC life in America. I actually pity Bruce, and anyone else in similar situation, for the extreme mental illness they're suffering. Instead of accepting his delusion, those close to him should help him treat his illness.

          There's a reason why transgenders have suicide rates 20X higher than general population. They mutilated themselves instead of addressing the root mental illness.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
            AG -

            You are replying to a post of mine in which I describe a natural condition in which an XY individual is physically female in every outward respect. There is no mutilation occurring in this instance...but you have not commented on that aspect of transgender existence.

            We already know that I totally disagree with you with respect to conscious choice to get a face lift or decide to become another gender - but I am curious to see your take on natural transgenderism.

            Jan
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
              In humans, transgenderism does not occur. Certain species (amphibians, etc) can spontaneously change sexes, but not humans.

              Once sex selection occurs in utero, the process is final. There's no such thing as gender change in humans. The body can be surgically altered to look like another sex, but there is no sex change.

              If a doctor is asked to determine the sex of a transgender using skeleton, DNA, or anything other scientific method, the answer will be the sex that person was born. NO true sex change is possible in humans.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
                What do you consider a human who is an XY female?

                Jan
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
                  The test is remarkably simple: Born with a penis=man and born with a vagina=woman. That's it.

                  The lunacy of this entire media powered attack to redefine normal is predicated on the false notion that sex change is even possible. It isn't. Appearance change is possible, but not sex change.

                  Appearance change, however, should NOT entitle one to use bathrooms, locker rooms, or any other facilities of the opposite sex. That infringes on the rights of other normal people simply because the "victim" decided to mutilate his/her body.

                  Again, we're being asked to accept a false premise. If a man wants to look like a woman, that his prerogative, but that does make him a woman and should not give him the right to impose his abnormal behavior on others.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
                    OK. So you do not define a man as a 'person with a Y chromosome' or a woman as 'a person with ovaries'. That was what I was wondering.

                    If there were no Men's Bathrooms or Women's Bathrooms (let us imagine that all bathrooms become 'single water closets that either sex could use), would you have any objection to a person transgendering just because they wanted to as a matter of their individual freedom of choice?

                    Jan
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                    • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
                      I frankly couldn't care less if someone I don't know, and about whom I don't care, decides to mutilate their body. That's their business. But, they're not changing their gender, only their appearance.

                      If I cared for the person, I would do everything in my power to encourage them to address their mental illness instead of mutilating themselves.

                      My problem is their sickness infringes on the rights of others.

                      I get the impression from your comments that you're intelligent. That leads my to believe that your comments are intended to "stir the pot" as your assumptions tend to require Cirque du Soleil contortions in reality (i.e.- if there were no men's/women's facilities, cultural norms, etc. would sex change be ok on the third blue moon of a leap year).

                      The bottom line is that any rational thinking person recognizes that sex change isn't possible. Only appearance is changing. And if someone is so excruciatingly unhappy with themselves that they're will to mutilate their bodies to this degree, they have mental illness that should be treated as such, and glorified as "brave".
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
                        No, I am not a 'stir the pot' type. My observations on the 'single closet bathrooms' are that many parks and fast food restaurants have gone to those.

                        I genuinely disagree with your perception on whether or not a sex change is 'mutilation' and whether or not it is 'genuine'. I just do not see any purpose in fratching with you about opinions that differ - I am more interested in exploring the margins of what you think

                        Jan
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                        • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
                          Well, we know definitively that the sex of the person undergoing the operation doesn't change. The change is only in appearance. If you have brown eyes and you wear blue contacts, your actual eye color is still brown.

                          The margins of views are no different from the core. Facts are facts. A is A, and it doesn't become B at the margins.

                          If Bruce Jenner's remains are discovered a thousand years from now, scientists will identify those remains as those of a man, because they are. Again, it's his business to surgically alter his body, but his sex will always be male.

                          Fire is hot, water is wet, and your birth sex IS your sex.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by $ jlc 8 years, 10 months ago
                            This is an interesting discussion, but the space is getting pretty small and we each seem to be reiterating our stances...Thank you for letting me know not only 'what' you believe but 'why' you believe in it.

                            Jan
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by gcarl615 8 years, 10 months ago
    I stopped watching Dancing with the Stars when they tried to foist Chers offspring as man. I find that and this disgusting and abhorant. What has Jenner or any other kardashians ever produced?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 8 years, 10 months ago
    Silly. I don't know many people who think what Bruce is doing is "normal", but many think he should be able to do what he wants. If he/she doesn't want the comments, he/she should stay in hiding. It is pretty clear he/she like the attention, so take the good with the bad.

    The fact is, I could do a standup routine focused on he/she, and people would like it. Therefore, shut up about Clint.

    On the other hand, Clint was a little too artistic in his Obama bash. Too bad. Clint is a great entertainer, and stalwart man.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by nsnelson 8 years, 10 months ago
    When you get to be 85 years old, you don't care so much about what is PC. They know it's just not worth it to waste your life pretending to be something other than you are. Rand would call this integrity, honesty, or justice, and not buying into a code of morality that you don't really accept.

    ā€œJustice is the recognition of the fact that you cannot fake the character of men as you cannot fake the character of nature, that you must judge all men as conscientiously as you judge inanimate objects, with the same respect for truthā€ (933; P3C7).

    ā€œHonesty is the recognition of the fact that the unreal is unreal and can have no value, that neither love nor fame nor cash is a value if obtained by fraudā€”that an attempt to gain a value by deceiving the mind of others is an act of raising your victims to a position higher than reality, where you become a pawn of their blindness, a slave of their non-thinking and their evasions, while their intelligence, their rationality, their perceptiveness become the enemies you have to dread and fleeā€ (932-3; P3C7).
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by 8 years, 10 months ago
    The bottom line is Bruce Jenner will always be a man. It doesn't matter what body mutilation occurs, he's a man (as is any man going through this process), just as any woman mutilating herself to achieve the opposite will always be a woman.

    An apple can be painted orange, but that doesn't make it an orange. A is A. To deny facts is to deny reality, and that's what this entire media frenzy seeks to do. They want us to believe that he isn't really a he anymore or she really isn't a she.

    I fully expect to wake up one day soon and hear the booming voice of Rod Serling narrating our PC life in America. I actually pity Bruce, and anyone else in similar situation, for the extreme mental illness they're suffering. Instead of accepting his delusion, those close to him should help him treat his illness.

    There's a reason why transgenders have suicide rates 20X higher than general population. They mutilated themselves instead of addressing the root mental illness.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 10 months ago
    I really don't care what Bruce/Caitlyn does. I can't get offended by what Eastwood said either. Some people, especially those in the media want to make everything so serious and a matter of public political correctness. I don't understand why people like Jenner want to be so public about what should be a personal matter. "Can't we all just get along" without getting into everyone's business? Can't we just be more relaxed and not be so easily offended? Something to lighten the mood perhaps? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc80tFJp...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Ducky 8 years, 10 months ago
    This seems to me an opportunity for Jenner to step up in defense of the First Amendment, and remind everyone that if he had courage enough to make this change in his life (like they say he did), he certainly has enough courage to take a little good-natured ribbing.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo