14

La La La I Can’t Hear You - The Ignore Feature (BETA)

Posted by sdesapio 8 years, 12 months ago to The Gulch: General
72 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

In the Gulch, everyone loves, respects, and admires everyone else. We always agree with each other on everything, and we never get upset or angry. Things never get heated, and we’re always rational and our best selves. My favorite times are when we get together and sing Kumbaya. Ahh… the memories.

Eh ehm.

Sometimes however, on a very rare occasion, people just rub each other the wrong way. And, while everyone always strives to make nice, sometimes you wish you could SHUT THOSE PEOPLE OFF.

Introducing… drum roll please... “Ignore.”

“Ignore” essentially provides you the ability to anonymously, and individually, “turn off” any other Gulch member at will.

Click the “Ignore” link located underneath any post title and all activity by the originating member will effectively collapse and be hidden from your view. FOREVER.

Mwu-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!

Some things to keep in mind:
1. This is a BETA. It’s not done and there may be bugs. Let us know if you run into anything odd.
2. When you click “Ignore”, you are electing to hide that member’s content across the site (“Ignore” is not isolated to any single post).
3. For now, the “Ignore” feature is device specific - if you ignore me (sdesapio) on your desktop, you will have to ignore me again on your smartphone or tablet.
4. You can un-ignore at anytime by clicking the “Un-ignore” link that will replace the ignore member’s content.

Go ahead, give it a shot. Ignore each other. ;)

- - - - -


All Comments

  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    okay;;; I was taking you optimistically, since I see
    the NSA as the real spooks and the gulch admins
    as friends. . but we really need to think that each
    word is being visited by both. . I sent a memo to
    gulch admin the other day which may have brought
    about the "ignore" feature, though it had to have
    been waiting in the wings to arrive that fast. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    J, I was alluding to what the Gulch's Powers That Be might 'use the information for,' not how the users might block annoying 'posters.'..... :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    oh, I bet that someone will get pissed and turn it on
    to block an offensive commenter -- might not last
    long, but it will be used. . at one time, khalling assured
    Scott or someone that any feature which is added
    will indeed be used ... at that time, I believe that it
    was about the meeting in the northeast. . I wonder
    if the past re-appears when ignore is turned off. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    :)... 'bet that it will be used...'...
    by whom and to what end?
    Quacks like an NSA, walks like an NSA,... and is here to ......?????????
    :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    silly? . nope; astute! . I bet that it will be used, but
    those against whom it's used will be "none the wiser"
    since they'll see nothing except a lack of awareness
    on the part of some folks. . if they can see that at all. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    although it may eliminate a LOT of messaging back and forth about 'you're ignored by...' ... 'you're 'un-ignored by.....', the system does have some 'open-loop' aspects, like invisible feedback to the people Being Ignored, and that, just by itself is not generally an improvement to 'communication.'

    Unless you don't care OR that was intentional...
    But you know me... always asking silly questions and making silly observations...

    :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mamaemma 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Winterwind, I find that I don't want to "ignore" anyone. I can just skip over some comments if I want to. But I still think this is a good feature, because it is up to each individual to ignore someone if they want to, or not to. No one is making the decision for me, and somehow I find it easier to tolerate something offensive ( which is rare) just knowing that I have the option to not tolerate it if I so choose.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    just wondering where you get these things -- some
    side application, cut-n-paste? -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    and I don't AM anyone who doesn't AM me first. . and
    I don't SSB or FM anyone unwelcome. . by the way,
    what is PM == Permanent Wave? -- j
    l
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    as usual, you are right on all fronts. . and if any of
    my postings -- in genuine interest for the site -- made
    your temporary "ignore" list, I apologize. . my view is
    that I want to see it all, and select for myself.
    Your Comments Are Always Good. . Thank You,
    Winter!!! -- john
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ winterwind 8 years, 11 months ago
    I have to start my reply by saying that I haven't spent much time in the Gulch lately - partly other obligations, partly it seems to have changed in a way I can't explain, but don't enjoy, and partly because my "reply" feature has gone the way of my "mark as read" feature.

    And since I'm only a commenter, after all, not really a contributor, it just got too hard to be here.

    So, what I have to say about the Ignore feature applies to the Gulch of, say, 6 weeks ago or so. There were posts that I wanted to ignore and so I did - I went right past them. There were posters I never read.

    Now done, I find two features to object to. One, an ignore hides a member's post side wide. That means that one is saying, by using the ignore, that the person never has and never will have anything worthwhile to say. That's an incredibly harsh judgment, and as for the "in the future" part, probably untrue.
    The other feature is the anonymity. I know everyone can't do this, but I think that if one is going take such a drastic action as erasing someone from their world, he should be able to at least tell his target.

    I also have a question. If there is a problem which requires a solution this drastic, where was admin while the rancor was building? When people are unable to communicate, or constantly irritate other members, there should be someone to shut the tow parties is a room and not let them out until they agree on how to treat each other. and yes, I mean NOT LET THEM OUT.
    That may have happened, but I saw no reference to it.
    I imagine I'll be here - and there - but I know there will be a rash of "ignores" and anti-ignores and spite ignores and several I haven't thought of. Sounds rather sterile, and of all the things Objectivism is, could be and should be, sterile is not among them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Technocracy 8 years, 11 months ago
    A new change..

    How long since last post in the thread.

    That is a very nice.

    Thank you :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I too have listened to [almost] full speeches of his a couple of times, back in 2007-8. Didn't take long to recognize that they were an almost verbatim translation of Lenin.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I think I've read you stating this before.
    I also could not shake the paw of that vile despoiler of all things American.
    He repulses me so much I do not want to be anywhere near that lying bag of Marxist slime.
    I'll even change to another radio station when he pops on with a voice bite and switch back after 30 seconds.
    Would you believe I once listened to him deliver full speeches?
    Now if I wanted to do Presidebt O 'Pinocchio harm regardless of the consequences, to impress Jodi Foster maybe, getting up close to shake hands would be the perfect approach.
    I find it almost unfathomable that many politicians (of any and every given persuasion) have not had knives stuck in them.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    further, Scott::: will I know if someone has ignored me,
    when it starts or ends? -- john
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    :)))) sure, but I was picturing just another selection up at the top with Hot, New, Categories...... and Ignored...

    Sort of a real-time Winners (?) Leaderboard... :)
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 8 years, 11 months ago
    I can see how this might make some people pleased, it is nice to be able to filter your world, but in some cases, I can see it might just be a conversation limiter. But if it makes things less tense, go for it!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    certainly, especially if you own those evil black (and I thought black was beautiful?) guns. You're a danger to the children, to women, to minorities. (They never mention white men, so maybe you're not a danger to white men, but white men don't matter anyway).
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by strugatsky 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    On a serious side, I said at work that I wouldn't shake Obama's hand if offered (he did a PR stunt at the Mall shaking idiots' hands). I was investigated for allegedly planning on "doing harm to the president"! Didn't get very far, put picked all my bones to the marrow.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo