All Comments

  • Posted by $ jdg 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    This only confirms what I've been hearing from other sources. Obama was dealing arms to Isis, and that's what some of those killed were there to do. Naturally, when the deal went sour it was very convenient for BO that they not come home.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Well, yes, I know that we have a large group in the population who are delusional..still some hope that a few will wake up and we will not be saddled with this nightmare. She comes with "impeach me" tattooed on her wrinkles and that is just a waste of time.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I would argue they are no worse but no better either that is except for a select few. I know of zero progressive with includes 99% if the dems that reduce the size of government.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    "Even difficulty to get less out of the other side."
    The other side is the Republicans, who I think are worse, unless you count talk with no action. If talk counts, President Clinton gave some anti-big-gov't talk, but clearly Republicans are better at the talk. Unfortunately their actions are worse when it comes to making gov't larger and more intrusive.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    You can lobby until you turn blue but will never get less out of Hillary and all other progressives. Even difficulty to get less out of the other side.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Correction. With morning coffee, I see I misinterpreted CG's add on statement. Everybody he knows supports her/it. Makes more sense, now.

    Must be lonely though, surrounded with Hillaryites.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I saw that article. there were still an non-insignificant group who thought she was! and that she related to all of us!
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I haven't read up on it, but it strikes me as the comments about the Exxon spill, President Bush's response on hearing about the Sept 11 attacks, and engineering failures I've been involved with. It's so easy when things go wrong to play political games condemning the people doing the work.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Indeed there was an article that said she had lost ground based on "trustworthiness and honesty". Can you believe that?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    sorry; I didn't hear their identity, just a trustworthy
    report that one declined the opportunity. . and now
    that the new act has been signed into law, this is
    quite pertinent. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by johnpe1 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    as I see it, it was either:::

    raw incompetence -- they couldn't believe the danger
    to them, or

    pretense -- pretending that BHO's statement that
    al qaeda was on its heels was true, and behaving
    accordingly

    either is horrible when it comes to people's lives,
    I believe. . we should not have people who are
    responsible for this tragic event ... in elective office. . imho. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Flootus5 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Ed, I agree with you. I seem totally confused. After repeating an already stated statement recognizing that most here have no stomach for a very dangerous aspirant to the WH, and then following with a statement that CG does not know anybody that favors Hillary - how does that equate to anything opposing or supporting her?

    Wait a minute, simple premises, I am not the one confused here.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 8 years, 11 months ago
    I thought this was a real barn-burner! My thoughts...after not voting for a while?...Either this guy is on the ballot or I'm not voting again. I know that may tick some people off. But, Rand is the only guy who gets it as far as I'm concerned. I honestly see zero chance in hell the GOP will back him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    Clever move. Good to have a smart wife. It still makes him her namesake even if unintentional.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by lenar 8 years, 11 months ago
    I love this guy. He hits so many good notes. Just hope the left doesn't bury him.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by edweaver 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    I am still confused CG. You state you are for smaller limited government but the only way to have that is to get government out of people's lives, not by creating and lobbying for more government policy. It makes no difference what policy. The truth is any time government is creating a policy of any kind, it is creating the policy for one group against another group. There is a winner and there is a loser. That is the only reason to create a policy at all. This IMHO is looting at the point of a gun.

    So convince me otherwise. Please give me an example of a policy that does not have this effect.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden due to member score or comment score too low. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 11 months ago in reply to this comment.
    And which state is going to produce one? Nothing illegal about it and all they have to do is do it. to start with funding the idea fully with no federal money. No that is not the National Guard it's 95% federal funded and think about the name. There's a reason for saying National. Absent a smidgen of legality under the old constitution would it stand any chance under the Patriot Act? Or just be treated as an armed insurrection. The military itself who has the right, the duty, and the responsibility has refused to act. Things are a little different when the bullets start flying it's no longer rhetoric,What saves you is the second word. I'ts only a thought...not an action. Until thinking is declared illegal. About five seconds after Hillary is elected.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo