felon may sell confiscated guns -- supreme court

Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago to Government
9 comments | Share | Flag

interesting finding. -- j
.


All Comments

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 9 years ago
    A reasonable decision: I see no reason why he shouldn't be entitled to sell the guns for what he can get on the open market. The conviction demands that he may not possess firearms but doesn't say he must be deprived of the value of them. He should be able to sell them, give them away or destroy them... If the state demands that he not possess them and confiscates them, he must be compensated unless the value is a fine/part specified in the sentence. Suppose the guy had one gun or hundreds... a few hundred dollars worth or thousands...
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    prior restraint, like prohibitions of things before they
    occur? . censorship is the activity which comes up
    first in wikipedia, but laws against bad things are all
    over. . the slope is the convoluted thinking that any
    receiver of his guns could get them back to him in
    some strange way. . maybe it's overreach. . this
    is the kind of thing which amounts to legislation
    from the bench, and it sucks. . I think I got it. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    they didn't say where in FL this fellow was working.
    it's a fair bet, though, that the anti-gun infection is
    contagious there, imho. -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    From the standpoint of who currently owns the guns, yes. However, the judges ruling seems to be that if the gun is sold to some guy that he knows, that guy 'might' let the first guy control the gun. If we take that out a step further, if the gun was sold to some guy that he doesn't know from Adam, in theory, that guy might let him control the gun too.

    I don't know what an Objectivist would think of the reasoning, but I fear a court or by extension a government that believes that it can make prior restraint work. At that point, as far as I'm concerned, all bets are off. Do you see where I'm coming from?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Florida is like four separate countries. North Florida is like a southern US state. Central Florida (where I live) is pleasant and fairly representative of the US as a whole. South Florida, particularly Palm Beach, Broward (Ft. Lauderdale), and Dade (Miami) counties is like no place else in the world in several ways, but is definitely more "progressive" than the rest of the state. Finally, there are the Keys.

    Where there is gun confiscation in Florida, it is mostly a local or county-wide phenomenon. My county is not afraid of guns and has the Police Hall of Fame, in addition to the space launches.
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by 9 years ago in reply to this comment.
    Reuters says that Tony Henderson is a Florida
    border patrol agent for DHS. . does FL rank up there
    with the gun-confiscation governments? -- j
    .
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 9 years ago
    Charged with distributing marijuana. Anyone want to bet that the real offense they went after was that he owned guns?
    Reply | Permalink  
  • Posted by SaltyDog 9 years ago
    God help us if rulings are made over what one 'might' do. A VERY slippery slope to say the least.
    Reply | Permalink  

  • Comment hidden. Undo